POND PRO'S QUESTION #32. Why do you suggest that there is a mania for pros to deny the possibility of Madeleine’s blood being behind the sofa?
It's not possible to attribute a DNA profile to a particular body fluid. So FSS would not report that in the report.
However we DO know that Keela ONLY ALERTS TO BLOOD and so if DNA was retrieved from Keela's alert then it would be BLOOD!
Is that logic?
There is also ANOTHER reason that suggests it is blood...
In Gerry's arguido testimony he was shown the video of the dogs behind the couch.and after 4 MONTHS he suddenly declares that Madeleine had nose bleeds.
He did not mention about any other possible body fluids.. Was that because he KNEW what was behind that couch?