Introduction to the HiDeHo 48 questions

Title: Introduction to the HiDeHo 48 questions
madeleinemccanncontroversy > HiDeHo 48 QUESTIONS > HiDeHo 48 Questions	Go to subcategory：

Author	Content

HiDeHo
Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM	Date Posted：10/02/2015 8:18 PMCopy HTML Unfortunately, the POND were not receptive to viewing from this forum, claiming that it was 'Infected' and that I harvest IPS. As for harvesting IPs? Most people are aware you cannot identify anyone from their IP and one of the uses in all forums is to identify when several IDs are proven to be the same person. Firstly they were assured this forum is SAFE Their thread comments will be shown in the following messages after each answer with a reponse to any lies. It was suggested to me to answer 48 questions regarding the Madeleine Investigation and the method in which I admin my group, HiDeHo CONTROVERSY of Madeleine McCann. In reference to the 48 questions that Kate McCann refused to question after she was declared Arguida Facebook format did not allow for my answers to be fully explained so I chose to use our Reference Forum. My responses can be read in the Pond as well as HDH. Cass Sidebotham February 7 at 5:09pm · Edited The 48 Questions that Lizzy HiDeHo Taylor refuses to answer. 1. Why do you say 4 markers were degraded in DNA sample 15/37 2. Why do you quote de Almeida’s interim report as if it is the conclusion of the files? 3. Why do you allow posters proved to have paedophilic thoughts to infiltrate and influence your group? 4. Why did you make up your mind before the PJ Files were released? 5. Why do you and your admins bully and boot off posters who challenge your view of the case? 6. Why don't you let Amaral's mistakes, incompetence and criminal convictions be discussed but instead portray him as a saint and victim? 7. Why are your members disallowed from having a proper dogs debate? 8. Why did you say you would debate with Robin and Robert and then back out of it? 9. Why do you claim Amaral’s book is a distillation of the police files? 10. Why do you present your own material instead of referring people to the actual files? 11. Why do you create graphics about things that are not in the files? 12. Why do you continue to support a book which has been proven to have harmed the McCanns? 13. Why do you not accept that they are NOT suspects for any investigation? 14. Why are we not allowed in your group to help correct myths and misinfo? 15. Why do you misinform in your videos that the chances of it not being Madeleine’s DNA in the car, is millions to 1? 16. Why do you allow your members to viciously attack ‘pros’ on your group, and then always end up removing the ‘pro’ to stop the trouble being caused by your ‘anti’ members? 17. Why do you allow Janine Bresnick’s nonsense to go unchecked? 18. Will you admit to being a propagandist? 19. Why do you support wicked men over Madeleine? 20. Why do you claim 15/19 markers were found, when this is blatant misinformation? 21. Why do you try to explain (sometimes using cheese) something that the forensics expert said was too complex for analysis? 22. Why do you suggest that the DNA found in the car was definitely blood related? 23. Why do you allow John Lowe to be libelled on a daily basis in HDH? 24. Why do you state that Kate knew Madeleine was dead? 25. Why do you disregard completely the results of the GNR sniffer dogs? 26. Why do you perpetuate the myth that only Kate’s fingerprints were found on the window 27. Why do you perpetuate the myth that the PJ searched in vain for any of Madeleine’s DNA in the apartment? 28. Why do you produce graphics driving controversy over the ‘last photo’? 29. Why do you say the prosecutor could have declared the McCanns innocent? He could not have done this, as there was no indication of any crime for them to be innocent of 30. Why do you state that the sea-bass, dirty nappies, leaking meat container, Madeleine crying are EXCUSES from the McCann team? 31. Why do you allow that pic of the lady sighted by Anna Stam, alongside the GerEfit, presented with the pic of Kate and Gerry McCann, to be posted in your group? 32. Why do you suggest that there is a mania for pros to deny the possibility of Madeleine’s blood being behind the sofa? 33. Why do you allow your members to suggest that Madeleine’s blood had seeped under the tiles, when the blood under the tile belonged to a Portuguese police officer? 34. If all you want to accomplish is for the UK PUBLIC to have access to the files, why do you insist upon directing them to Amaral’s book and documentary? 35. Why do you make liars & accomplices out of witnesses in an attempt to suggest Madeleine was dead before 3rd? 36. Why do you post in horror over the treatment of Brenda Leyland, whilst supporting Sonia Poulton who plans to employ the same techniques in her documentary? 37. What feedback from OG have you received to your videos? 38. Why did you use the image of Brenda Leyland in your video, even though she was not a member of your group, and you have no idea whether her family want her to be represented as such; and also before the results of the inquest are disclosed? 39. Why do you allow Christopher Roberts to be in your forum despite his inappropriate comments about children and disgusting behaviour in the community, including the illegal obtaining and sharing of private messages of other members, and obtaining addresses in order to threaten? 40. Why do you use old press articles in your videos as if the information within them is current? 41. Why do you allow your members to perpetuate the fridge blog myth, even though you know it is made up? 42. Why are you adamant that no myths or misinformation are presented on you forums? 43. Why do you still maintain dogs give evidence in your videos, when they only provide intelligence? 44. Why don’t you now close HiDeHo Debates? 45. Why do you deny the influence of your videos whilst boasting about how far they have reached? 46. Why have you started a new group aimed at helping 'One Child At A Time' when everything you do is to the detriment of the McCann twins? 47. Why won't you take responsibility for the lies and misinformation of others - Frances Gallagher, Ben Thompson, etc.-that has been taken directly from your materials?. 48. Why will you not answer questions?
HiDeHo	Share to: #1
Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM	Re：Introduction to the HiDeHo 48 questions Date Posted：10/02/2015 8:23 PMCopy HTML Cass Sidebotham Lizzy Hideho Taylor February 7 at 5:16pm · Like Lorna O'Regan I'm very interested in 37 February 7 at 5:25pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham I seem to remember it was your question. in the main, these are question she has been asked and steadfastly refused to answer. February 7 at 5:26pm · Like · 2 Lorna O'Regan All good questions Cass February 7 at 5:27pm · Like Cass Sidebotham no comment means guilty, doesn't it? lol February 7 at 5:28pm · Like · 3 Lorna O'Regan She'll be 'too busy' to answer but never too busy to come up with videos and graphics. February 7 at 5:29pm · Like Cass Sidebotham Lets give her a chance, bless her, she was up trolling into the wee small hours last night. February 7 at 5:30pm · Like Karen Miller F February 7 at 6:21pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold I can only get the first 36 Cass. Is there any chance of sending this post as a pm to me please? Xx February 7 at 6:57pm · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Just been directed here and would love to answer them but have been declared a HiDeGuida so please insert 'No Comment' to them all which of course...according to you...means I'm innocent of all accusations February 7 at 7:17pm · Like · 12 Graham Arnold Are we then to understand that Lizzy will not query the '48 questions' again? February 7 at 7:22pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor My admin have advised me not to answer, we have a HiDePact, and anyway, don't you serve refreshments here? This will not do! February 7 at 7:36pm · Like · 3 Graham Arnold I'll put the kettle on Lizzy HiDeHo just for you, milk and sugar?. How are keeping anyway? Are you good? February 7 at 7:46pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Thanks Graham....No sugar for me please February 7 at 7:50pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor so they left you in charge? February 7 at 7:51pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor or has everyone blocked me? lol February 7 at 7:52pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Did you leave as well? I thought we were bonding just then February 7 at 7:54pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Sorry Lizzy I was in the bath. No I'm not in charge but I think everybody has gone to bed! February 7 at 8:45pm · Like Francis Williams I know the answer to 37 Lorna, she was filed in the same nutters drawer as Tony Bennett, Stephen Birch and John Baldwin, in a file entititled disturbed and potentially dangerous for future monitoring. February 8 at 2:00am · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney We were all tired Lizzy Hideho Taylor. I am on anti histamines so they made me tired all day although non-drowsy prescription! February 8 at 4:28am · Edited · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Can I just point out for the benefit of Debates Fan Club readers, that the only people who called Mr Roberts as a result of me giving them his phone number were the London metropolitan police. February 8 at 4:30am · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Is that so Cass? February 8 at 4:31am · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham He keeps saying I gave his number out to folk, and I did not. That's all I will say on the matter. February 8 at 4:32am · Like Kelly Louise Cozens Well done Cass Sidebotham someone has to stop his inappropriate comments February 8 at 5:11am · Like · 1 Kelly Louise Cozens Well the 48 questions Lizzy Hideho Taylor refuses to answer that means your guilty doesn't it lizzy why would you refuse to answer them February 8 at 5:12am · Like · 5 Cass Sidebotham I could understand it if a lawyer had advised against it. But that's not the situation we have here. February 8 at 5:13am · Like · 4 Pamela Gurney Lol, ironic! February 8 at 5:14am · Like · 2 Lorna O'Regan Chris is going to answer these apparently when he gets time. February 8 at 5:14am · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney It's not for Chris to answer!! February 8 at 5:15am · Like · 3 Kelly Louise Cozens Come on Lizzy Hideho Taylor I mean a refusal to answer in your eyes makes one guilty so why are u refusing to answer February 8 at 5:16am · Like · 2 Cass Sidebotham How can Chris answer for Lizzy? Lol He does like to be involved, doesn't he? February 8 at 5:17am · Like · 3 Kelly Louise Cozens Is this the same Chris that's making innapropriate comments towards children February 8 at 5:18am · Like · 2 Cass Sidebotham Yes, Kelly. One could suggest his comments about Madeleine are indicative of a paedophilic mindset February 8 at 5:20am · Like · 1 Richard David I can assure everyone that we will never give a mouthpiece to paedophiles on this group February 8 at 5:22am · Like · 3 Kelly Louise Cozens I'd be interested in tearing a strip off him February 8 at 5:50am · Like Lorna O'Regan Still waiting February 8 at 7:30am · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Hope you are feeling better Pam...and I was not offended that everyone had gone to bed except Graham who made me tea I laugh every time I see the title of the OP....I havent refused t answer...Well I did up there ^^^^ but that was a moment in time comment. 48 questions take a while....You cannot deny me the time, surely February 8 at 8:12am · Like · 3 Cass Sidebotham They're all questions you've been asked before and not answered Lizzy. February 8 at 8:14am · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan Take it one at a time then? February 8 at 8:14am · Like Lorna O'Regan Seems Chris is answering for you anyway on McCann and other mysteries February 8 at 8:21am · Like · 1 Richard David Should. keep you from making videos and graphics for a while, which have been proven to potentially cause harm to the McCann twins if you answer these questions Lizzy Troll February 8 at 8:27am · Like Cass Sidebotham The old codger is trying to make out the comment to Brian is what I am referring to when I say he makes inappropriate comments about children. If only that were the only one. It's the copious comments about Madeleine to which I refer. February 8 at 8:35am · Like · 2 Karen Miller No one is interested in what Chwis has to say....when will it sink in February 8 at 8:36am · Like · 5 Richard David I have all people blocked who display characteristics of paedos. How is the first question answered? February 8 at 8:37am · Like Richard David Lizzy's still trying to decide how to spin an answer to question 1 February 8 at 8:52am · Like Cass Sidebotham First question is fact, Chris says lol February 8 at 8:56am · Like Richard David Lol that shows how little he knows pointless reading on after he's said that, utter dim wit February 8 at 9:18am · Like · 3 Kelly Louise Cozens I wonder where they get all there information from February 8 at 9:57am · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Could it be Lizzy's videos, perhaps? February 8 at 9:58am · Like Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor has been a very naughty old girl over the past 7 years. God knows what set her off or why she decided on the dreadful route but one day hopefully there will be a full explanation other than she wishes only to bring the PJ Files to everyone in UK...very odd reason if I might say so. February 8 at 1:09pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham As if the UK public are arsed lol February 8 at 1:10pm · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney Why would the UK public even be slightly interested? I think they are happy enough that OG are investigating or don't care at all. February 8 at 1:11pm · Like Richard David Still nothing? Think i'll go and bath my chickens February 8 at 1:50pm · Edited · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Come back Lizzy, I've made some more tea, no sugar February 8 at 1:50pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Lizzy says she is busy right now but will answer when she has the time! February 8 at 1:51pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Thanks for the tea Graham...Sorry I had to slurp and run but love the Royal Albert February 8 at 2:04pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Answer the questions Lizzy February 8 at 2:05pm · Like Pamela Gurney What are you and Joy Savage doing this afternoon Lizzy Hideho Taylor? Both up to no good, I'll be bound! MARSHA! February 8 at 2:06pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Yes...Pam is right....I cannot dedicate my full day to answering the questions. I'm workig on them and will keep you updated next time i stop by for a cuppa. February 8 at 2:06pm · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan Izzy wizzy wizzy, let's get busy February 8 at 2:07pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold You're welcome Lizzy, anytime. x February 8 at 2:07pm · Like Helen Phillips Lmao February 8 at 2:08pm · Like Graham Arnold There is only one way we are ever going engage in a proper debate between the two camps. Diplomacy! It may stick in the throats of both sides, but isn't about time be looked at what we ALL agree on as good starter? February 8 at 2:14pm · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney The 2 camps will never meet on a level playing field. There is far too much misinformation and myth making on the anti side and so many are taken in by them. For instance, I have just been reading another anti who is convinced in her own mind that Ka...See More February 8 at 2:23pm · Like Joy Savage Pamela Gurney may I ask? Why? is my name on this thread? When you clearly see I afford you the respect of removing any comment with your name included from any group I admin. February 8 at 2:45pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Graham Arnold. Many members from all opinions took over a group that was not intended fo debate but I allowed it continue asking everyone to monitor themselves. It was quite successful for a few months until another group opened and there were exposed contrived efforts to disrupt. At that point I removed about 5 people involved , allowing most of them back if the efforts to disrupt did not continue.... The new group continued and the rest is history, but most of them really enjoyed interacting with the others. Very unique but spoiled by a few...sadly February 8 at 2:45pm · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney You came onto the thread Joy to like Lizzy...sorry! February 8 at 2:45pm · Like Graham Arnold Pam, I was refering to a starting point, not a free debate. It would be very easy to set up a diplomatic forum involving just a handful of key people running groups, a balanced committee. The debate or minutes can be a private matter for that very small group without the glare or scrutiny of the general public. This needs to be done in the light of the boss of twitter declaring that he is going to clean up his act. Our groups need to follow suit immediately or risk deletion as Facebook will undoubtedly make a similar announcement soon. The clean up has already begun, we All need to get our houses in order, stop bitching and trolling, pool our knowledge and start behaving with far more accountability. We can't afford to wait for the shit to hit the fan! It needs doing NOW! February 8 at 2:46pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Carter Ruck have also told us they'll be after more facebook and twitter defamers of the McCanns from hereonin so yes, these hate groups need to remember twitter bosses words, and facebooks pledge and CRs promise and SHUT UP! February 8 at 2:48pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney A load of knowledge has already been sent to OG...we can do no more really except support the McCanns through these dreadfully hard times. February 8 at 2:50pm · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan I did open a fencesitters group but no one joined lol February 8 at 2:57pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Is that true? Lol February 8 at 2:59pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold They won't be after individuals. There will stricter guidelines for groups and the task of admins will be all the more difficult to police. Those groups who claim to be a free debate group will no longer be able to express an opinion in the group info! Measures like these are coming, media companies are beginning to protect themselves from the litigation of complicity! February 8 at 2:59pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Not before time either! February 8 at 3:04pm · Like Lorna O'Regan Lol yeah. All these folks going on about both sides being too extreme so I set up a middle ground place and no bugger joins! Hahaha February 8 at 3:06pm · Like · 2 Annie Burnett Grint I would Lorna O'Regan February 8 at 3:10pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Feel free to advertise it here Lorna x February 8 at 3:12pm · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan Um wrong link February 8 at 3:13pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Get it off...lol! February 8 at 3:13pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Ugly forum Lorna O'Regan...are you a member??? February 8 at 3:15pm · Like · 1 Karen Miller Far too many groups.....it's ridiculous February 8 at 3:16pm · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan Lordy no Pam, it's a horrid group February 8 at 3:18pm · Like · 1 Lorna O'Regan Can't get it to link February 8 at 3:19pm · Like Lorna O'Regan Got rid of the nasty link now! February 8 at 3:20pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold I will join your group Lorna if you ban personal jibes about ANY individual. If it is fact only, and supported with a link, I will join gladly. February 8 at 3:21pm · Like · 3 Cass Sidebotham Can't find it Lorna when I search February 8 at 3:22pm · Like Lorna O'Regan I've never seen any fencesitter groups before. Just pro or anti run with there being heaps of the latter! February 8 at 3:22pm · Like · 2 Lorna O'Regan I think that's how come I ended up with a nasty group link coming up instead Cass I'll try and figure it out when next on my PC. February 8 at 3:23pm · Edited · Like Lorna O'Regan Thanks Graham February 8 at 3:24pm · Like Karen Miller I'm not really sure there is a fence.....you either believe sy or you believe the smear February 8 at 3:26pm · Like · 3 Pamela Gurney That is what I feel too Karen Miller. February 8 at 3:31pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Cass Sidebotham, Lizzy Hideho Taylor. This post is a fantastic opportunity for the two camps to iron out some differences. There must be some stuff that is agreed. For the sake of Madeleine, I am not asking for the two groups to suddenly throw their arms around each other in a moment of sixties loving hysteria! But seriously we need to start co operating in the following criteria: 1. To agree on guidelines concerning personal comments and attacks, whoever they are. 2. Agree to tighten up on admin supervision and sign up to a new group charter that is well within acceptable operating rules! 3. Form a well balanced closed committee of group admin to ensure that these lines are not crossed and that NO GROUP finds themselves libelous. The purpose of admin will undoubtedly have to adapt and initially the workload will increase, as the members gradually catch up with tighter rules. These rules are coming, we may as well start adapting now, why wait? This is a brilliant post Cass Sidebotham and I am pleased that Lizzy Hideho Taylor has engaged on this thread. I will be so disappionted if this thread turns into an assassination of Lizzy Hideho Taylor. The thread is huge, give her time to respond. Let's not have any snide remarks or rudeness. Cass took a lot of time and effort to post this and Lizzy has alot work to do to respond. She has already engaged on this thread. Please be polite, be patient. If you want a response, don't be rude! Xxx February 8 at 8:11pm · Like · 2 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Thanks Graham Arnold. Hoping you have the kettle on? February 8 at 8:31pm · Like Graham Arnold No sugars? Lol February 8 at 8:37pm · Like Graham Arnold Lizzy Hideho Taylor, there has to be a point at which common ground needs to be established for the sake of Madeleine. None of this is about any of US. It's about that little girl. Can we at least pool some of our rescources for that common good? February 8 at 8:41pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor I'm not sure if you saw my post above regarding the accidental group I have. For months many got along well. I have always had a good rapport with many members and admin here via PM... Cass (Kate) Pamela Gurney , Gwen James, Diane Winch as well as Prateek/Robert gues/Richard D sort of...lol You may need to read the previous post to understand what happened and it was very sad. For months everyone 'got along' and although the group was self moderating it went fairly well and I know that many loved it. I have been chatting with Pam for more than a year now and though we totally disagree and she loves calling me all the names under the sun (without swearing) we can still chat as people. It's very strange but when I am in PM with someone its the person I chat with not the 'pro' (though I hate that word. I'm open to everyone having an opinion, no problems with that. My concern comes with being told that only one opinion exists, which is of course not something that someone with an open mind should consider.... I am of course taking Cass up on her challenge but unfortunately i cannot dedicate my day to responding to the pond so I will need some time to put the 48 answers together... Golly, it took Kate 8 years to answer ONE! lol Thanks in advance for the cuppa...Dont forgt the Royal Albert as thats the only way to have a good cup of tea February 8 at 8:43pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Lizzy Hideho Taylor, I did read and digest your comment fully. Just because an attempt with a particular formula fails, doesn't mean that another attempt with an improved formula will also fail! Are you willing to keep trying for the right formula for the sake of Madeleine? I already know the answer Lizzy, so lets just get on with it and stop bickering. All our hearts are with that little cherub, she is counting on us. February 8 at 8:52pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Its encouraging to hear you say things like that Graham..Anyone that knows me knows that i get along with everyone and bickering is not really my thing....not everyone gets along with me and that ok if thats what they choose...but I dont have room in my life for hate...i do however have a passion for the truth...a different truth to others apparently...lol February 8 at 9:27pm · Edited · Like Graham Arnold I do sometimes wonder though Lizzy whether the woroad is too much for you. And I don't mean that to be negative, just that we are only human and only have a certain number of hours in a day. You must find it challenging to police your sites in the way you would like, in an ideal world. I am sure you get the blame for lots of stuff that you haven't even read or seen? February 8 at 9:44pm · Like Graham Arnold Sorry Lizzy, woroad = workload lol x February 8 at 9:49pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Yes Graham...Thats my 'job'...but you have no idea what a great admin team I have and they function exceptionally well without me...but at the end of the day I am the one thats responsible and I will never allow my admin to be accused of anyting...they admin according to what they know i would choose and i am blessed to have them. They can almost read my mind... I dont allow a lot of the stuff that most groups allow....Not that they are wrong...just that I like to keep HDH as close to the files ad facts as possible with no ridicule or bickering and we do a great job considering all admin are on minimum wage....which translates to nothing..lolol Mind you...sometimes they get double wages...but very rarely February 8 at 9:51pm · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Im in Canada, hence the late night..5 hrs behind UK...You in UK? February 8 at 9:54pm · Like Graham Arnold Yes I am Lizzy, but I am pleased to have the rare opportunity to chat to you. It's 3am here. Talking of admin, all admin of groups have a difficult job to do. Maybe there is alot to be said for 'admin without influence'? Surely a true debate group should be without influence? February 8 at 10:07pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor You will find that my admin are unbiased...We encourage opinions that differ from others...that the basis of the group and no matter what an admins personal opinion, the never judge others or give their own opinion or theory...thats now what they are there for. They wouldnt be admin if they did....stuff like that is important to me. February 8 at 10:25pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Like you, I think everyone has a right to an opinion and debates should be based on each others opinion and not based on discrediting the other person. We all have our opinions based on our knowledge and I have always got along with those that dont agree with me because it makes me second guess myself and if my opinion still stands up then Im doing ok Regardless of our opinions we all care about Madeleine and seek the truth. February 8 at 10:29pm · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Anyway...I had better go. I have 43 questions to still answer...lol Thinking its past your bedtime also? February 8 at 10:35pm · Like Graham Arnold If you get stuck on any questions, pm me, lol. Goodnight Lizzy, hopefully we can chat again tomorrow! x February 8 at 10:39pm · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Thanks Graham...Is it cocoa tomorrow night? Dont worry about the questions...not much I'm going to get stuck on February 8 at 10:41pm · Like Graham Arnold Lol February 8 at 10:42pm · Like Richard David Lizzy Hideho Taylor is doing a lot of trolling but not answering any questions. Yesterday at 1:22am · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Richard, she has said that she is working her way through them, give her a bit of time, it's rather alot of work! If I can be patient, then so can others! (trust me, I am not normally a patient person but this is a huge post!) Yesterday at 1:58am · Like Cass Sidebotham Lorna's suggestion of one point at a time was a good one. Lizzy could have done at least 3 by now. Yesterday at 2:50am · Like · 2 Richard David It has been suggested that she answers them one at a time but clearly Lizzy Hideho Taylor is ignoring that advice. She has form for promising things like this Graham and creating diversion for long enough until people become tired and disinterested. I believe she has no intention of replying but await to be astounded. Yesterday at 2:52am · Edited · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham And Graham, you are lovely, but we do not seek a truce with Lizzy Yesterday at 3:06am · Like · 2 Gwen James It makes me laugh that a level playing field is expected here and both arguments are equal...they are not. It's like well armed truth clashing with a bunch of vivid imaginations. Yesterday at 3:23am · Edited · Like · 5 Pamela Gurney Gwen, you are. as ever, wise and correct. Yesterday at 3:48am · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor please work on the answers before you are removed from facebook by the law! Yesterday at 3:49am · Like Laura Lee Her admin are unbiased and welcome opinions that are different to others!!!! What a load of tosh. We were removed from hideho controversy and HIDEHO debates because of exactly that. Talk about two faced. Yesterday at 4:03am · Like · 4 Karen Miller But hey she did us a favour....look at us now looooool Yesterday at 4:06am · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney They also don't stick to files or related items and are allowed to go off into the realms of fantasy and conspiracy like all the others. Their members just need to hate for the sake of it, just like the other hate groups. Roll on the clampdown. Yesterday at 4:06am · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Free from her grips and brainwashing. Yesterday at 4:07am · Like Laura Lee Pam is it true your in regular contact with Lizzy by Pm? May I ask what do you discuss that can't be spoken about in the group. I'm not being nosey but intrigued because of your openness about your dislike for her?! Yesterday at 4:20am · Like Pamela Gurney I tell her off constantly about the fact her group is supposed to be file related only but that most of it is speculation as any other nasty hate group is. I have just done it again this morning. Yesterday at 4:21am · Like Cass Sidebotham Graham Arnold is now being accused of being me. lol. you couldn't make it up. Yesterday at 6:24am · Like · 1 Helen Phillips Nooooo oh my life.Talk about paranoia lol Yesterday at 6:26am · Like · 2 Helen Phillips Hahahaha ...priceless 😛 Yesterday at 6:27am · Like · 2 Kelly Louise Cozens I was hounded and bullied because I disagreed was accused of being mental a fruit loop told I deserved to have my kids taken off me for supporting child abuse and I left the group Yesterday at 6:44am · Like · 4 Pamela Gurney I am being called a child neglect apologist now in pm! How very dare they? Yesterday at 6:45am · Like · 1 Kelly Louise Cozens I've even been told im Kate mccann hahaha Yesterday at 6:45am · Like · 3 Pamela Gurney Yes, so have I! Yesterday at 6:46am · Like · 1 Heather Evans It all sounds soooo familiar Kelly Yesterday at 6:50am · Like Karen Miller Think we've all been accused of being you Pam at some point lol Yesterday at 6:52am · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney And I'm Kate Hotlips Healy. Yesterday at 6:53am · Like Cass Sidebotham I've been Kate McCann too!! Yesterday at 7:22am · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Loool! They really are comedians! Yesterday at 7:25am · Like · 1 Kimberley Jones Wow, Cass do you have any more info on Q 33 please? x Yesterday at 1:41pm · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Kimberley Jones the only blood found under the tile belonged to a GNR officer who lifted the tile. Yesterday at 1:45pm · Like Cass Sidebotham Will find it later for you Kimberley. Am involved with sorting laundry. Can't do necessary search on my phone x Yesterday at 1:52pm · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Yesterday at 1:57pm · Like · 1 Kimberley Jones wow! Thanks Cass, I've never heard or seen that before. Yesterday at 2:13pm · Like Cass Sidebotham They don't like to mention it on anti sites. But make no mistake, they know about it, and yet they allow people to spread the lie that Madeleine's blood seeped under the tiles lol Yesterday at 2:15pm · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney Macabre thoughts then emerge...it is all propaganda and meant to cause people to get wound up and imagine all manner of horrors. In fact there was a simple answer! Yesterday at 2:18pm · Like · 1 Graham Arnold Bloody tiles! Yesterday at 2:34pm · Like · 2 Cass Sidebotham Lizzy, maybe you could start with number 33 in the list of questions, as Kimberley had never heard of the DNA from the tile grout as belonging to a police officer. Yesterday at 2:54pm · Like Pamela Gurney Lizzy Lizzy Hideho Taylor ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Yesterday at 2:56pm · Like Cass Sidebotham thank you Pam, I could not tag Lizzy for some reason Yesterday at 2:56pm · Like Pamela Gurney It sometimes happens to me too Cass but I tried it and it worked for Lizzy today. Yesterday at 2:57pm · Like Cass Sidebotham Lizzy Hideho Taylor, can I just clarify if Roberts speaks for you in Mysteries? shall I take his answers as yours? 22 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney What is taking Lizzy so long to answer the questions? 22 hrs · Edited · Like Pamela Gurney Jeez Janine is barking mad: Janine Bresnick The fridge is a red herring, it was most likely a dig at Amaral re the Joana Cipriano case, where the parents clumsily used a freezer. The mccann case involved top level establishment help from the off and was a professional job! No fridge/freezers involved. Better look at the trip to Huelva where there's a Brit Gov owned cemetery 22 hrs · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Please understand I am doing my best but I dont have enough time in the day to do everything else that needs doing, however i am trying. I believe I have mentioned that before.. 22 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Well hurry up and at least answer that one to start with. 22 hrs · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Since when have I been oblgated? I have been working on it regardless but I'm beginning to wonder why bother! I would have presumed you had respect for others' time? 22 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Hi Joy! 21 hrs · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham one of the arguments I see on your forums all day long is that the truth needs no thought. 21 hrs · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney That is a good point Cass...I've just read it too! 21 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor can you answer this one in advance please as we are all interested: 33. Why do you allow your members to suggest that Madeleine’s blood had seeped under the tiles, when the blood under the tile belonged to a Portuguese police officer? 21 hrs · Like · 2 Cass Sidebotham just number 33 then Lizzy. 21 hrs · Like Cass Sidebotham the rest later 21 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor please???? 21 hrs · Like Lorna O'Regan But Chris managed to respond quite quickly? 21 hrs · Like · 1 Gwen James Well excuse me for thinking Lizzy is just being a big ole tease! 21 hrs · Like · 1 Pamela Gurney Why is Chris answering on behalf of Lizzyanyway? 21 hrs · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor Call me what you want, but please understand you are not here to tell me what to do, but I will honour your request in the time I have available. I presumed the questions were serious and my approach to them is very different to Chris. He uses rude words more than I do 21 hrs · Like · 5 Lorna O'Regan He certainly does lol! 21 hrs · Like · 1 Lizzy Hideho Taylor OK....Less of the accusations please... Are these questions for real or not, because if this is a game to you and an opportunityto 'accuse' me then why would I bother? 21 hrs · Like Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor we would like the answers....seriously. 21 hrs · Like · 1 Richard David bump 12 hrs · Like · 2 Fiona Ryan Bump 11 hrs · Like Pamela Gurney Lizzy Hideho Taylor you are taking an age with your answers! 9 hrs · Like Kimberley Jones I'm curious about 26 also. I was led to believe km's finger print was the only one found. One solitary fingerprint. That has always been very suspicious to me. 8 hrs · Like · 2 Pamela Gurney No Kimberley that is not the case. There was a fingerprint inside of Kate's but why wouldn't there be? The other fingerprints found were partial and unidentifiable. But if you look at Portugal's forensic team back then in 2007, how good were they? Answer, not very. 8 hrs · Edited · Like Pamela Gurney You can always refer to the PJ Files Kimberley:http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/FINGERPRINTS.htm P.J. POLICE FILES: FINGERPRINTS This information belongs to the Ministério Público in Portimão, Portugal.It was released to the public on 4... MCCANNPJFILES.CO.UK 8 hrs · Like Pamela Gurney On Kate's finerprints: Observations: The fingerprint traces collected are identified as being the middle finger of the left hand (3x) and forefinger of the left hand (2x), of the missing girl’s mother, The fingerprint inspection was only carried out on the inside of the window because it was night time, the location was sealed and preserved so that light conditions would permit the inspection of the residence to be finalised 8 hrs · Like Pamela Gurney Nothing sinister there because Kate would have touched the windowpane during the week's occupation. 8 hrs · Like Kimberley Jones Hmmm ok. Thank you. 8 hrs · Like · 1 Cass Sidebotham Kimberley, the legal summary explains further that it wasn't that Kates were the only prints on the window, just the only ones with enough intact markers to identify "the only latent fingerprints that were collected, with the number of elements that are necessary to perform a positive identification, were individualised as belonging to the missing child's mother and to a GNR officer" - pj files 20 mins · Like
HiDeHo	Share to: #2
Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM	Re：Introduction to the HiDeHo 48 questions Date Posted：16/02/2015 12:39 PMCopy HTML bump

Cass Sidebotham