FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES?

Title: FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES?
madeleinemccanncontroversy > HiDeHo 48 QUESTIONS > HiDeHo 48 Questions	Go to subcategory：

Author	Content

HiDeHo
Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM	Date Posted：03/03/2015 1:26 AMCopy HTML FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES? Would YOU trust this 'man' or his AGENDA? Is it about Madeleine or is it about discrediting those of us that believe in the Police Investigation? YOU DECIDE! Why do we not allow you into HDH? Maybe this page will explain! MYTHS to you...are FACTS in the files....but it appears you believe the lies you are told. ' KEELA THE BLOOD DOG ALERTED TO THE BACK OF THE CAR! WHY DO YOU DISREGARD THAT! Lets not forget that any of the questions asked can be obtained from a PRO website that took the time and trouble to list all the details and 'facts' to discredit the Police Files... With a computer and search facility ANYONE can get the 'pro' answers It's curious why that site wouldn't be 'quoted' and 'linked' to more often! It would save 'Richard' the trouble The 'AWESOME' Richard David.....AKA Robert Guest (aka many, many more) Lets just go back a year and a half..... Prateek Varshney...James Stanton.....Robyn Whyte......Robert Guest..etc etc..AND who could forget JOSH BRADLEY! I'm up for a joke as much as anyone....but this was in a 'secret' group and the lies were being spread ready for a 'BOMBSHELL'...Yeah right! Keep in mind they were in the debate group that was NOT admined, except for disruptors, as everyone was expected to SELF MODERATE! After seeing this chat I needed to remove and ban them to prevent the disruption.... ANYONE can understand why, so LIES about my flippant banning of members has ALWAYS been a lie Disrupt and you will be banned and we SAVE THE PROOF! I watched, like everyone else to see what he would 'produce' for this bombshell lol HERE IS THE BOMBSHELL SEX CHAT! He is a LIAR and a FAKE! He went on to be 'Prateek Varshney' BEGGING for a debate which I NEARLY arranged..... His CREDIBILITY took an ENORMOUS tumble and I no longer wanted to be connected with someone who's interests in the case were NOT about Madeleine but about WINNING..... And playing GAMES..... I am not concerned with peoples opinion and certainly have never judged anyone on it.....but when you come across those who are FIXATED on delusions of GRANDEUR because they think they can 'WIN' any debate....well, I have ZERO interest because it goes without saying that all they will do is use their newly learned 'facts' and use them to discredit any justified argument, in other words EVERYTING IS DISCREDITED AT WHATEVER THE 'COST' as long as it makes them APPEAR to 'win' LIES and misinformation do not 'WIN'. The TRUTH will ALWAYS stand up to the scrutiny. The TRUTH doesn't need to 'WIN'. Like MOST people believe.... Once a lie has been proven how can they EVER be believed again? I have PROVEN the LIES.... If anyone chooses to believe a LIAR thats their prerogative.... Just remember KNOWLEDGE is always POWER!
HiDeHo	Share to: #1
Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM	Re：FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES? Date Posted：06/03/2015 12:54 AMCopy HTML Lizzy Hideho Taylor 2 hrs · Edited PLEASE NOTE: As a 'PRO', if attempting to discredit HDH, one should ensure that your credibility can sustain the accusations wink emoticon I have an issue having HDH being claimed as a HATE group! Suggestions that we are under scrutiny for 'vile' comments are totally unfounded and its time to put things straight. I have no idea about other groups but I DO know that HDH adheres to the strictest guidelines and thousands of SAVED deleted post prove that. I have been in contact with Operation Grange (who have seen the 'dossier') and there is NOTHING to suggest that we are in violation of anything. Madeleine's parents were made suspects in September 2007 and there was a REASON for that. To suggest they are proven 'innocent' is totally unfounded and untrue. We are all free to have an opinion about the parents POSSIBLE guilt in the 'disappearance' of their daughter and no amount of intimidation about being (wrongly) labeled 'trolls' is going to stop us allowing the police INVESTIGATION files to be known. These files show the possibility of the parent's involvement in their daughter's disappearance. We are free to question the claims of the parents and their friends on that holiday back in 2007. I am personally disgusted with the manipulation and lack of credibility of any group that discredits a full scale POLICE INVESTIGATION because 'they' claim to have all the answers. One may want to look at the credibilty of those that claim the know more than most....Their personal agenda is far greater than anything that puts Madeleine first. I don't have an issue with those that believe in the parent's innocence. Different opinions are to be respected, but an effort to discredit others' opinions to achieve grandiosity; using manipulation as a weapon, particularly when combined with a history of game playing and lies (that didn't achieve the result intended) is no longer something I will tolerate. Brenda's inquest is upcoming, so with respect to her and her family, I will refrain from making any further comments, but in the meantime I urge everyone to base their opinions of what they know to be true and not on false efforts to discredit the Police investigation to serve their own selfish agenda. Your own opinion is important...and you are free to believe whatever you feel is true to you. Please base it on FACTS and CREDIBILITY and not MANIPULATION and LIES! http://forum4.aimoo.com/…/FACTS-and-CREDIBILITY-or-MANIPULA… FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES? - Madeleine McCann CONTROVERSY FACTS and CREDIBILITY or MANIPULATION and LIES?YOU DECIDE!Why do we not allow you into HDH? Maybe this page will explain!MYTHS to you...are FACTS in the files....but it appear you bel. FORUM4.AIMOO.COM Like · <input class="uiLinkButtonInput" data-ft="{"type":24,"tn":"S"}" type="button" value="Comment" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, 'lucida grande', tahoma, verdana, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; border: none; color: rgb(109, 132, 180); cursor: pointer; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; vertical-align: baseline; background-image: none; background-attachment: initial; background-size: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-position: initial; background-repeat: initial;"> · Share Maureen Kirkwood, Denise Dundas, Kevin Fluffy Sarsfield and 22 others like this. Helen Kirsty Antcliff 1 hr · Like · 5 Lorraine Holden Love it x 52 mins · Like Lizzy Hideho Taylor Just have to ask one question...Would you trust information from this 'person'? 39 mins · Like Lorraine Holden Do you need to ask...definitely not 32 mins · Like · 1 Angela McLeish Bradley As much as I would trust Pinocchio. So that would be an emphatic No. 32 mins · Like · 1

Lizzy Hideho Taylor