HiDeHo
|
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Date Posted：03/02/2018 3:53 PMCopy HTML
Thanks to Anna Esse for the translation from (Police Association?) Enfants Kidnappes http://www.kidnapping.be/maddie/maddie.htmlhttp://frommybigdesk.blogspot.ca/2008/11/mccann-case-anomalies-in-case-file.htmlThe McCann case: anomalies in the case file.
Enfants Kidnappés
22/11/08
Since a small part of the case file - the DVD version was made accessible to the public, a great deal of ink has flowed. We note that it is necessary to be cautious as to its contents. In fact, it is only 17% of the complete case file and certain details are only of interest in relation to the complete file and not taken out of their context.
You probably know that our team, at the association, is comprised mainly of professionals from the field of police work. As such, we have analysed the case file and from the first pages, we have identified a few anomalies. Thus, the registers from the Kids Club appeared to be incomplete. Certain gaps have not been explained.
Thus we note that on May 1st 2007, Madeleine McCann's name is on the Kids Club regsiter. She arrived at 9.30am, dropped off by Gerry. According to the register, Gerry spent the morning playing tennis. He went back to fetch Madeleine at 12.20pm. Where things seem stranger to us is in the entries for the afternoon. Gerry drops Madeleine off at the Kids Club at 2.30pm and he spends his afternoon, again according to the register, playing tennis and at the swimming pool. Oddly, no one went back to fetch Madeleine in the evening! No signature for the evening of May 1st 2007. Why? Why did no one sign the register that evening?
Various explanations are possible.
It could be imagined that the parents arrived late to pick up Madeleine and that they didn't take the time to sign the register. In that case, why isn't that made clear in the case file? Why is there no mention of this possible lateness? And above all, why were they late? Right in the middle of an investigation into the mysterious disappearance of a little four year-old girl, these details are important. But the anomalies continue the following day.
According to the register for May 2nd 2007, the day before Madeleine's disappearance, Kate dropped Maddie off at the Kids Club at 9.20am. Madeleine was picked up at 12.30pm but it's not Kate or Gerry's signature on the register. Someone else has signed the register in the space for parents. The signature of Cat nanny, in other words, CATRIONA BAKER is found there.
Here too, you could imagine various explanations. The parents arrived late (once again?) and in a hurry (why?), they didn't sign the register. You could think that they forgot, for the second time, to sign the register. You could imagine that Catriona had finished her shift and as the parents had not yet come to fetch Maddie, Catriona signed the register then took Madeleine to her parents. You could imagine lots of things. But no explanation is provided in the case file. Catriona didn't mention it in her interview, the parents neither. But this kind of detail raises questions that need to be resolved. Too many unanswered questions, too many whys, too many gaps, not enough explanation.
These explanations could go in both directions. Thus, the investigators must wonder if Maddie didn't disappear sooner than May 3rd? If she was indeed present present at the Kids Club on the afternoon of May 1st? Why didn't anyone sign the register? Was she actually present at the Kids Club on the morning of May 2nd? Why did Catriona sign in the space for parents? Why does Kate's signature on the register for May 2nd seem different from Kate's other signatures? Where were the parents if someone else signed for them?
Certainly, these anomalies may only be trivial details, but these details could equally be significant, even fundamental to the investigation. Don't forget we are talking about the disappearance of a little four year-old girl. We cannot allow ourselves to leave these questions unanswered.
These anomalies, which are the first of a long series, were communicate to whom they may concern. And it is in referring to the article on SOS Madeleine of November 19th, we discover that a hand-writing report would be necessary. This confirms our suspicions and implicitly confirms certain rumours mentioning forged pieces of writing, forged signatures....manipulated documents...signatures added several days after the date indicated...etc.
If this report, that SOS Madeleine speaks of, confirms our our suspicions (and the rumours) these details which we have officially revealed, are then clearly less "trivial" !!!!
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#1
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 3:55 PMCopy HTML
|  Guilty or innocent? |  November 17, 2008
Are Kate and Gerry McCann guilty or innocent?
This is the question that must be asked at this point. To answer it one must ask another essential question, Maddie she was removed or not? If the professionals of the judicial world who have followed this affair very closely from the beginning, it is very quickly noticed, at the same time as the Portuguese PJ, that the theory of the abduction became, over time, less and less plausible; the revelations made by SOS Madeleine last november 11 dealt a fatal blow to the theory of kidnapping. It's even one of the detectives of the Spanish agency Metodo3, hired by McCann parents to find Madeleine, that we learn that they were not hired to find Maddie but to look away from the public opinion (and perhaps the PJ) to Spain or Morocco. The goal is to manipulate the media and the public by inventing false leads in these two countries also causing the slowdown in the investigation (The PJ must check, each time, these many false leads). Journalists were invited to interview witnesses paid by the agency to claim to have seen Madeleine. If these revelations are correct, and there is no reason to doubt them, one can in any case question the whole of the statements of many witnesses who claimed to have seen Madeleine. Especially with regard to witnesses who, by chance, one day had a connection with the McCann family, including via the Netherlands (sic). these many false tracks). Journalists were invited to interview witnesses paid by the agency to claim to have seen Madeleine. If these revelations are correct, and there is no reason to doubt them, one can in any case question the whole of the statements of many witnesses who claimed to have seen Madeleine. Especially with regard to witnesses who, by chance, one day had a connection with the McCann family, including via the Netherlands (sic). these many false tracks). Journalists were invited to interview witnesses paid by the agency to claim to have seen Madeleine. If these revelations are correct, and there is no reason to doubt them, one can in any case question the whole of the statements of many witnesses who claimed to have seen Madeleine. Especially with regard to witnesses who, by chance, one day had a connection with the McCann family, including via the Netherlands (sic).
Kidnapped or dead?
Another question comes to mind: Why detectives have not been hired to find Madeleine contrary to what was proclaimed high and loud by parents shot dead by the abduction of their beloved girl? Why would parents hire detectives to do a gigantic media show and slow down the ongoing investigation instead of finding their girlfriend? The only plausible answer to this question is that the parents knew that Madeleine was not abducted. But then, what became of Madeleine? Always based on the veracity of the statements of SOS Madeleine, also, the only answer that comes to mind is: the death of the small. This assumption is the one that has the most consistency and is the track chosen by the investigators within the Portuguese PJ in agreement with their British counterparts.
So, guilty or innocent?
If Madeleine died, which seems to be blatantly the truth, she was by accident. The little girl's parents are not murderers. There are two hypotheses that are retained. The first is death due to too much Calpool. The sedative dosage of which is higher in Portugal than in the UK. Maddie would be awake in a half coma, stumbled, it would be violently hit and died of her injuries. Another hypothesis evoked and which largely takes precedence over the previous one, is the theory that Kate would have quarreled with Madeleine. During this dispute, Kate would have made an unfortunate gesture, Madeleine would have bumped to an edge or a piece of furniture, she would bleed profusely and died quickly (whiplash bumping for example). Short, a terrible drama for his parents. In both cases, parents are liable to a few years in prison. Or for manslaughter, in the first case. Either for accidental wounding resulting in death without intention of the data in the second case. With a difference in size regarding Portugal: In the eyes of the law, if there has been child neglect, the other children of the couple will be immediately placed in Portuguese social services WITHOUT possibility of return to their British family !!! It was clear that in addition to the misfortune and the pain of losing Madeleine, it was urgent to put the twins to a halt. Also, a close member of Gerry being the main funder of the political party of the British Prime Minister, the latter was contacted the evening of the disappearance of Madeleine by Kate (of his own admission). Then, the media, via Sky News, helped launch an unprecedented media machine when the director of the PJ received, in the middle of his dinner in Lisbon, a phone call on his cell phone of the British diplomacy informing him the the disappearance of a British girl while the local police was not yet there! In the place of parents, in the same situation, with the relationships they have, would we not have done the same thing to protect our other two children? A phone call on his British diplomacy phone signaling the disappearance of a British girl while the local police was not yet on site! In the place of parents, in the same situation, with the relationships they have, would we not have done the same thing to protect our other two children? A phone call on his British diplomacy phone signaling the disappearance of a British girl while the local police was not yet on site! In the place of parents, in the same situation, with the relationships they have, would we not have done the same thing to protect our other two children?
Was there a scam?
Still referring to the revelations of the detectives of the Spanish agency engaged by the parents, in the eyes of the law, yes there is swindle! A scam for the creation of a fund to find Madeleine, whose money has mainly been used to pay detectives who admit they have never been hired to find Madeleine. 50,000 euros a month to divert the attention of the investigation. Fraud to feelings and it is, surely, the most serious. All these people who felt solidarity, affected by the disappearance of Maddie, having poured money on a background that was to be used to find it. We all fell in the trap. We ourselves, here, at the association, we cried, like you, imagining this poor child, abducted, alone without her blanket to reassure her, crying all the tears of her body, far from her parents, panicked .... And much more horrible things that we will not talk about here but that justified the creation of our association. At first, the chord played until we realized that the abduction theory was difficult to defend. Not to mention that parents have not hesitated to attack various media and to reap significant sums in damages following the remarks made by them. But these famous words could well be the strict truth! Not to mention that parents have not hesitated to attack various media and to reap significant sums in damages following the remarks made by them. But these famous words could well be the strict truth! Not to mention that parents have not hesitated to attack various media and to reap significant sums in damages following the remarks made by them. But these famous words could well be the strict truth!
A mole at the PJ.
SOS Madeleine reveals the presence of a mole within the PJ considerate, in advance, the parents McCann of the various duties of inquiry that the team in charge of the file would realize. We understand better why parents suddenly had to wash Maddie's pink blanket and other clothes in the washing machine just before the arrival of the inspectors to seize this blanket and these clothes for a DNA analysis !!! We could add a long list of disturbing facts in the attitude of the parents but that fits perfectly if we know that a member of the PJ was telling them what would happen! Is this the attitude of people who have nothing to reproach themselves with?
Anomalies in the folder on DVD.
For some time, a tiny part of the complete file (ie 5,000 pages on 30,000 !!!), is accessible to the public. We have published some of it here. Note that we must be careful in the dissemination of its content. Indeed, this DVD is not complete and represents only about 17% of the total. Our association, as well as probably all the other professionals in the police world, has detected anomalies in the file. Indeed, some documents seemed doubtful to us to be suspicious. Some signatures, annotations, attracted our attention. We have done so by whomsoever in order to trace the information back to Portugal. Following this, and although we had known for a few weeks, the journalist Duarte Levy, in statement on Portuguese television yesterday, revealed that there were documents tampered with and manipulated within the file. It is there, neither more nor less than fake in writing ... No comment. Also be careful about what you read on various forums.
Death threats!
The director of the Portuguese TV channel, at the beginning of the program, which was attended by the journalist of whom we spoke earlier, Duarte Levy, informed the viewers that Mr Levy was coming to receive death threats from his cell phone. last revelations. These threats are taken seriously. According to our information, the journalist received two different calls. One from Portugal and the other from the UK, both threatening him with death! If the revelations made by SOS Madeleine are false, and therefore the parents have nothing to reproach themselves, why threaten people with death? Why does the McCann clan brand, at the slightest opportunity, a threatening finger to anyone who does not speak like them? Why try to silence the press?
In conclusion
If SOS Madeleine's revelations about the Metodo3 and mole detectives in the PJ are accurate, it can be concluded that the parents are not innocent. That Madeleine has not been kidnapped. That there is scam.And especially that the deception is taking lead in the island - proof of the various death threats - and that the truth will eventually see the light !!!
React to this article on the forum
|
| Russel OBrien |  October 21, 2008
Russell Hearing dated May 11, 2007.
Being of British nationality and not mastering the Portuguese language neither in its verbal form, nor written, it will be accompanied in his hearing by a translator: Alice DA
It completely confirms its previous statements which correspond to the truth and which will be reproduced for the acts legal.
Asked how he met the rest of the group's members who accompanied him on his vacation, the applicant says he has known David Payne since 1989, when they were medical students at the same university. Then they worked for a while in the same hospital but in different specialties. He knew Fiona Payne via David Payne, they were married about 4 years ago and the declarant was their witness.
He knew Matthew Oldfield in 1994, both being a doctor, they became friends. The declarant witnessed the marriage of Matthew Oldfield and Rachael Mampilly in 1999.
He met Gerald (Gerry) McCann more recently, around 2002 or 2003. He is also a doctor. The contacts between them were mainly through the Payne couple. The four couples met when the opportunity arose but, living quite far apart, they take advantage of holiday periods to meet and share moments together. Each couple has children of similar age, which is a factor of rapprochement.
Asked if they had problems related to their profession, the men of the group being all doctor as well as Kate Healy and Fiona Payne, the declarant affirms that, for its part, he does not remember to have known a situation which is worth quoting. However, he recalls that Matthew Oldfield had a difficult experience where one person's parents accused the medical team led by Matthew, who was on duty that day, of a late diagnosis that would have resulted in the death of a patient. The reporter is not aware of any direct threat to Matthew Oldfield or any other member of the medical team, but only one complaint has been lodged with the Hospital against the team involved. He is not aware of a similar situation towards Gerry McCann or Kate Healy.
When questioned whether there were problems between or in the hands of couples, whether professional or sentimental, or even vicious, the declarant asserts that he has nothing particular to say which would be interesting to record in the present act. He says he does not know enough about the intimacy of each couple he does not care about. This is the type of agreement they have between them. They see each other when they have the opportunity to talk and do sports activities in a friendly atmosphere. He adds that the couple with whom he has a little connivance is precisely the McCann couple but that it is for all that he is aware of strange or complicated situations. He is not aware of any vices, drugs or gambling on the part of the people in the group.
Asked the declarant specifies that this is the second time that the four couples are together (the first time had been at the wedding of David and Fiona in Italy). Although he has already spent his holidays with two or three couples but not with the group currently in Portugal. He recalls that in September 2005, three couples, excluding the declarant and his wife, spent their holidays in Mallorca. The declarant and his wife did not accompany them because Jane Tanner was in late pregnancy.
These holidays have been prepared by everyone, although it is David and Fiona who have settled the details.The reporter and his wife, Jane Tanner, traveled with the couple Matthew Oldfield and Rachael Mampilly and their respective children on the same flight. Following the various travel times, the four couples met directly at Ocean Club Resort where they dined around 18:00 at the Millennium restaurant. When booking it was requested that all four couples be placed in the same block so that they could more easily monitor the children. The Millennium restaurant is located away from block 5 where couples were staying. As the Millennium meals are served after 7:30 pm, except on Saturday for the reception of new guests who arrive there, they found this late hour for the kids. They opted for meals at Tapas which is near the pool, back to the block of apartments where couples were staying. The declarant adds that the children of David and Fiona are very agitated so they preferred to be as close as possible to the apartment. All couples have agreed without objections.
When asked, the declarer said that during their holidays in Greece in the same tourist chain Mark Warner group they were aware that there was a service called Baby Listenning which is to let children sleep in the apartment during dinner while controlling children by a monitor through the windows to hear if the children were crying and immediately informed the parents. The declarant states that this service exists in Greece but not in Portugal. That's what they learned while making the reservation. At the Ocean Club there is a babysitting service for the period when the parents dine. This service is free. The children do not stay in the apartment but in the facilities of the nursery. The home care service is paid (about 15 / hour) and works even at 1:00 am. For here, they opted for a type of surveillance to children similar to that used in Greece. Thus a rotation was organized between each element of the couples to make a control. They thought that with the number of adults present, it would be easy to proceed in this way. Sporadically, someone was standing up and intending to listen, near the windows of the room, if the children were crying.
When questioned, the declarant states that the couple David and Fiona Payne did not get up to check the children because they had a table intercom, considered reliable enough not to need to check on the spot. He says he does not know how many times each member of the group got up to check their respective children.Being worried about his child, the reporter was checking in with his wife Jane Tanner which was more convenient. The declarant informs that he has moved only once to the McCann couple's apartment but does not recall whether it was deliberate or if someone had asked him. He states that he did not know that the glass door from behind that gives access to the apartment would be closed but not locked. Probably Gerry told him tonight, to get into the apartment and check the children. The declarant explains what he and his wife are concerned about, and that kind of checking was safe and effective. So each of the group members would check their children regularly, normally every 15 to 30 minutes. For its part, it ensures that all doors and windows are closed and locked, while specifying that the windows and glass doors of the living room can be closed - and opened - through the interior of the apartment. He only saw Gerald McCann and Kate McCann using the back glass door. The latter being the easiest access, via a staircase, and the McCann apartment was the closest to the promenade. During the check, they did it only by auditory approach by attaching windows.
Asked about the habits during the holidays, he confirms all his previous statements so his version absolutely coincide with that of his wife Jane Tanner and in full compliance with his statements. He was not aware of anything unknown / suspicious happened Thursday, May 3, 2007 in the group or friends with children.Everything seemed normal to him from the cleaning staff, the gardeners and the rest of the resort staff. Even at the beach, he never saw strange or suspicious people.
When questioned, he said that no one in the group had used a vehicle, either private or rented, since people in the group had not moved away from Praia Da Luz.
The registrant presented a version of c that occurred on 03 May. From this version, it is clear that all the facts presented, their activities and / or other elements of the coexisting group, coincide with the version already presented by his wife Jane Tanner.
Only for the period of the night, he says that on May 3, around 19:15 / 19:30 he was at the apartment. He told stories staying with Emie OBrien who felt slightly better but who refused to fall asleep. Nevertheless, his companion went to dinner at Tapas restaurant around 20:30 / 20:40. As the menu was always the same and the group knew its contents, the declarer told his wife what he wanted to eat and she placed the order while he was trying to sleep Emie OBrien. When he arrived at the restaurant, the group was almost full, with no children, however. Only David, Fiona and Dianne Webster were missing 10 minutes later.
Around 9:00 pm they ordered all the dinner. As usual, every 15 to 30 minutes, one person from each apartment went to the apartments / rooms to check if the children were fine. That night, as Emie was not well, the intervals were reduced. He remembers that Matthew Oldfield left the restaurant around 9:00 pm to check that there was no problem with the children. He is no longer sure who came out first but, at his idea, about 5 minutes later, Gerry McCann was seeing his children. About 5 or 10 minutes after Gerry McCann, the declarant's wife left, in turn, to check the children. Like the other couples, the control was only audible.Jane Tanner, as usual, went to personally check the condition of their children. He does not remember who,
Around 9:25 pm, enjoying a break between the dishes, the reporter left the restaurant with Matthew Oldfield to see the children. He arrived at his apartment and immediately heard Emie crying. He stayed in the room with her. He thinks that Matthew Oldfield was checking his apartment but does not know if he was responsible for checking also that of the McCann couple. Matthew Oldfield, after going to the apartment of the declarant to see if he needed help, went back to the restaurant and told Jane Tanner that the declarant had stayed in the apartment with Emie crying. In fact the declarant completely changed Emie's clothes because she had vomited. His companion came to replace him about 15 minutes later so that he could finish his dinner.
Around 9:55 pm he returned to the restaurant where his plate was served for 5 to 10 minutes. All the other guests at the table had finished the meal.
Around 22:00 Kate went to see the children in her apartment where she came back desperate, shouting when entering the restaurant to the table of our table that Madeleine had disappeared. We all ran out, with the exception of Diane Webster. With several people it was decided to go around the blocks of apartments and our own apartments to see if Madeleine was there. In the searches that were done after Madeleine's disappearance, the reporter did not notice any suspicious item / person / object.
To our question, he answers that he can not describe how the children's room was after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, because he never entered. As soon as they were alerted, they immediately left the table and the declarer started the search in the area surrounding the blocks of apartments and then in the village and in the beach area.
When questioned he does not know if the shutter of the McCann children's room window was open or closed.He can not answer the question because he did not notice anything. He adds that when he went to see the children with Matthew Oldfield, they were talking and they did not look at the windows.
Asked if he knows, if Matthew Oldfield at, or did not, check McCann's kids, he reports that he does not know because he had stayed with his daughter Emie in his apartment. But he later heard that Matthew had gone to check on the McCann children and that he would have seen the twins but not Madeleine's bed because he was in an angle where he had no eye contact.
When questioned, he claims to have no suspects to present and that he does not recall any details or circumstances that can be reconciled with the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
At our request, he claims to remember no incident or discussion between any of the elements of the group.The declarant remembers only a fact that does not matter much to him but that he gives us in the circumstances. So between tennis and the beach, he met a British named Nigel, married and having a daughter about 3/4 years. He had trivial conversations with this person. On the day of Madeleine's disappearance in the middle of the morning, as he was going with the children to a tennis class, Nigel approached. He was filming his daughter with a video camera. In front of the various facts of facts on pedophile films, they ended up starting a conversation that the declarant considers perfectly normal and harmless in which Nigel to comment that one would be almost afraid to film his own daughter. The declarant agreed and both spoke of the ridiculousness of the situation and the state of our world. The declarant states that he has no reason to suspect Nigel, who appeared to him to be a normal citizen with a normal family. He had no more thought of this conversation but he reports it after all the situations he has experienced this week.
He says that this is the truth as he knows it. At this moment we make him a request for oral sampling made by the specialist Irene T. It is with spontaneity that he acceded to this request by signing the present act.
React to this article on the forum
|
| GNR |  October 14, 2008
The GNR patrol
Laudition of the two policemen of the patrol arrived first on the spot reveals nothing of particular. However, it seems useful to us to publish the study in order to be complete with regard to this part. It should be noted, however, that the patrol rendered a detailed and much more comprehensive intervention report than what is contained in the hearing.
Nelson is heard as a witness. He was part of the GNR patrol that went to the Ocean Club on May 3, 2007, after receiving a radio call for the disappearance of a British girl on vacation at the said complex with her parents.Upon receipt of the call, the patrol immediately went to the reception of the complex where waiting for the father of the missing minor. Then, the patrol went to the apartment temporarily occupied by the family of the missing child to establish the circumstances of the disappearance. This is how the two policemen visited all the rooms and outbuildings of the residence. They also searched all the furniture to ensure that the girl was not hidden (Editor's note: Hidden by force or by force.
At the request of the PJ, the two policemen do not remember whether the wooden entrance door on the north side was open or closed when they arrived at the scene. On the spot was the mother of the girl and the twins.
Importantly, the police state that a British citizen, part of the group of tourists accompanying the family of the missing, named Jane Tanner reports that she saw a person carrying a young child in the holiday complex.
A series inspired by the Maddie affair.
Back to lactualité. Francisco Moita Flores is in the process of writing a series that tells the story of missing children and is scheduled to begin on May 3, 2009, the second anniversary of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. This is a six-part series centered on a Missing Children's Search Crime Squad. Among the episodes, there is one which evokes the disappearance of a girl from a beach and which is inspired by the distinctly Maddie affair but without being exactly the same story. And for good reason, since as he confirms himself, he did not have access to the file. The first recordings are planned for the beginning of 2009.
React to this article on the forum
|
| The PJ has doubts |  October 13, 2008
Several days of hearing.
It is May 08, 2007, the fifth day of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. At this point, the PJ took the testimony of several dozen people. Hundreds of pages of PV. Everyone has been heard. Ocean Club staff, Kids Club nannies or babysitters, Cooks and Tapas and Millenium cook helpers, housekeepers, gardeners, maintenance staff, Club Service Managers, Directors and managers of the complex, the tourists, the owners of the apartments, the neighborhood, the people present at the tapas on May 3, 2007, the tennis teachers ... in short, no one has been forgotten. Everyone has been heard. We save you all these auditions, which for the most part is nothing to investigate or at least no new leads.
1) No one has noticed an abnormal attitude in Madeleine.
2) No one noticed any stranger in the complex
3) No one noticed anything suspicious or could be related to Madeleine's disappearance.
4) No one noticed a suspicious vehicle or a suspicious unknown.
It should be noted that even the first NRG officers on the spot were heard by their pejist colleagues despite the intervention report sent.
During the last few days, within the PJ hearings, there has been a change in the perception of the file. Thus, the questions posed by the PC to the various witnesses suggest that the PC has doubts as to the statements of the parents or friends of the group. Note, however, that the slightest information concerning the slightest suspicious thing has been verified professionally and immediately. The numerous pages of the file attest to this. To date, May 08, 2007, each track, or beginning of track, was checked and it was, each time, false tracks. As for example, a suspicious car noticed near the reception of the Ocean Club by various witnesses. In the end, it was the service vehicle of a Club employee who came to repair, urgently, a lock of an apartment.
Why these doubts of the PJ?
Reading the various testimonies, given the many tracks checked, it seems difficult for anyone could enter the complex, enter the apartment McCann, take Maddie, leave the apartment, leave the Ocean Club, escape through a means of transport and that people, absolutely nobody, saw nothing. Not a stranger, not a suspicious or unusual vehicle, not the slightest shadow of a person carrying a child at times and places where there were other people. . From a police point of view, if these testimonies do not completely exclude the possibility of abduction, they make the thesis less credible. Therefore, the solution may be elsewhere.Especially within the group of friends (parents included).
Note, for the record that all the caretakers who have been in contact with Madeleine say that Madeleine came to them under the diminutive Maddie. This is nothing special on the record except that it contradicts some of Kate's statements. On the other hand, we can note that the Kids Club operated in three free services, including one in the evening until 23:30 so that parents can eat in peace in the restaurant. And finally, we know that a device alert disappearance exists within the Club. That it is a structured and thoughtful device.And that this device has been set in motion since the announcement of the disappearance of Maddie.Employees who were recalled from home to participate in the research.
Audition of an employee of the pool bar.
In her interview, this employee states that access is reserved for customers and that a check is made via the customer card at the entrance. She adds that she has met unauthorized person on the site. She explains that the day of the disappearance of Madeleine, around 20:30 his friend was called because of a lock problem in an apartment near the Millennium restaurant. She accompanied her friend on the spot. Around 9:00 pm, they returned to the Club reception. They passed near the Tapas and along the McCann family apartment. They claim to have seen nothing suspicious. They saw no one and no vehicle. Her friend left at around 9:10 pm with her service car and left at 9:15 pm in her own car.
Testimonies like this one, the file contains many of them. So, together, these testimonies contradict the statements of the tapas group9. A reconstitution would have made it clear immediately and underline the contradictions of the declarants.
React to this article on the forum
|
|
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#2
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 3:56 PMCopy HTML
Charlotte Pennington |  October 08, 2008
Hearing Charlotte Pennington.
It is the 7th of May 2007. The hearings of the different employees are continuing. Whether it's the Kids Club, the Tapas Bar or the Millenium employees. That day, Charlotte Pennington was heard. The interpreter who translated his words is none other than Robert Murat.
In this regard, it says:
The declarant is heard as a witness. The declarant, of English nationality, who does not speak the Portuguese language either in written or verbal form, laudition takes place in the presence of a translator: Robert Murat.
She arrived in Portugal on April 28, when she started working for the OCEAN CLUB as a babysitter.
The declarant states that in the period between 29 April and 04 May 2007, she assumed her duties with a children's group, on holiday in the aforementioned company, whose age range is from four months to one year. This group is called BabyClub. The BabyClub group is subdivided into three other groups of two babies and each subgroup is under the responsibility of a different facilitator.
As part of the current investigation, the declarant advises that, during her time with the OCEAN CLUB, she has been on various occasions with a child named MADELEINE MCCANN. Although not belonging to the group for which she is responsible, it is normal, since both groups are in an adjoining room. Thus, Madeleine McCann belonged to the group called MiniClub whose children are between 3 and 4 years old, and she explains that the group MiniClub and BabyClub are in the same building, near the reception of the OCEAN CLUB. This is why the declarant was in personal contact with the missing minor.
The declarant states that it was usual that during the nap period between approximately 09:00 and 10:30 and between 14:30 and 15:00, the declarant participated in the reception of the children for her group but also for her colleagues since the children she had the guard slept. She even moved near the children of the MiniClub and participated in some activities with them.
The declarant states that two separate days, namely Sunday, April 29, 2007 and Thursday, May 3, 2007, the declarant was personally in contact with Madeleine McCann by telling her stories and talking with her.
So that the declarant describes Madeleine McCann as an intelligent child, shy at first contact, but once she knows people with her, she normally speaks for her age while remaining calm.
The declarant adds that it was customary for Madeleine to be called Maddie since it was under her name that Madeleine was introduced to the declarant, which corresponds to the diminutive of her first name.
May 03, 2007, at approximately 10:15 pm, while the declarant was on duty for the MiniClub group for the slice of service called Dinner Period, together with her colleagues Jackie and Amy, a lady who does not know, but who must have been a tourist , went to their facilities and asked if they knew about the disappearance of a child whose name was Maggie or Maddie?
When asked about the dinner period, the declarant states that the company's daycare center offers parents the opportunity to leave their children free of charge during the dinner period between 19:15 and 23:00.
Before the confirmation that a female child had disappeared and, on the basis of the name that the lady communicated to them, they estimated that it should be Madeleine. This is why Amy contacted her superior, Lyndsay, by phone and informed her of Madeleine's disappearance. The lost child search procedure was initiated. This is research organized in different sectors of the company concerned.
For example, the reporter participated in this team research with her colleague Amy and covered various areas of the business that were assigned to them. By covering the area with the homes of Madeleine, the twins and the parents, she was able to see, in the meantime, various people inside the apartment without being able to say whether they were friends or employees. She participated in the research until 1:30 am (May 04, 2007) and she returned to her home.
In the research carried out jointly with his colleagues, other people also participated (tourists, employees of the company). Later, without being able to tell the time, she found that the police were on the scene and what measures were in place for this type of situation. The declarant informs that the search by the members of the OCEAN CLUB ended around 4:00 am on May 04, 2007, without result.
At our request the declarant states that having had little contact with Madeleine and only as a babysitter present in the next room, she does not know the habits of the child or his parents and what has not noticed a situation that finds strange about the missing child during the period of time she worked in Portugal.
The declarant adds that Madeleine was usually stationed around 9:15 am at the daycare and that the parents would drop the twins afterwards.
To our question, the declarant reports that she is not aware of the slightest situation that she suspects may be related, directly or indirectly, to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
She has nothing to add. After reading with the translator who explains, persists and signs.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Lori Campbell | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  07 October 2007
Leicestershire Constabulary
On 06 May 2007 the Portuguese Judicial Police receives a document from their British counterparts in which it is stated that:
Lori Campbell, a reporter at the Sunday Mirror has contacted the police in Leicestershire to report the following facts:
Lori spoke with an interpreter who is assisting the Portuguese authorities in the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. He introduced himself under the nickname ROB and gave no background information about himself. Lorie found ROB suspect because he gave contradictory versions to various people.He was quite worried when he noticed that the Mirror's photographer took a picture of him. ROB told Lori that he was having a difficult divorce in the UK right now and that he had a 3-year-old daughter, like Madeleine, from whom he is separated for the time being. He made a show in front of the reporters when he was with his daughter on the phone, and Lori found it a little bit pushing to do such a show when he was talking to his daughter on the phone. The things ROB said aroused Lori's suspicions.
The Portuguese authorities can contact Lori, who is still in Portugal, to get more details and to identify the person named ROB. She is contactable at n ° ....... ....
What can be deduced
The first question to ask about this document is why this journalist in Portugal, in contact with the country's PJ, refers to the police of a foreign country (in the UK) facts about an investigation whose RU is not in charge?Would the Mirror journalist know so little about the procedures?
The fact of going through the police in the UK to talk about his suspicions is administratively burdensome and time consuming.
In fact:
1- You have to talk about it - or send a fax which you have to type first - to the police in the UK (instead of the Portuguese police present on the spot).
2 - The administrative machine in the UK has to start up.
3 - It was returned to Portugal (where the journalist is) a document to join the PV.
4 - It is necessary to have this document translated by a professional so that it is recognized in the file.
Fortunately Robert Murat did not hold Madeleine captive because Lorie offered him all the time necessary to disappear!
In hindsight, some would say that we can see an attempt to manipulate the investigation. An attempt to remove the eyes. An attempt to slow down the investigation. Admittedly, these theories defend themselves as much as we are not at a manipulation of more or less in this file. Especially if we add the fact that it is precisely on the advice of the British consulate that Robert Murat was chosen as an interpreter by the Portuguese police! Would he have been a victim of a trap?
Others will say that Lori was afraid to arouse the suspicions of Robert Murat too present with the Portuguese PJ and what will be preferred to go directly through the UK. This theory is difficult to defend. If Lorie had contacted the Portuguese PJ directly, she would have been heard without Robert Murat's presence and the PJ could have directly auditioned Murat or put him under discreet surveillance. Instead, Robert Murat continued his translations in numerous auditions.
React to this article on the forum
|
| KIDS CLUB: Hearing of Catriona B. | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  02 October 2008
Hearing of Catriona Treasa Sisile B.
Laudition begins May 06, 2007 at 18h36. This is the fifth time that Robert Murat has been actively involved as an interpreter in the ongoing process. We will come back later on the first four times.
The declarant is heard as a witness. Being of British nationality, she does not master the Portuguese language in her verbal or written form, by virtue of which, and being present, offered to translate the hearing named: ROBERT MURAT resident Casa Liliana, Ramalhete street to Praia da Luz, 8600 Lagos and contactable via the phone no: 913 ......
To our questions, she answers that she has been in Portugal since March 21st of this year and that this is her first visit to Luso territory. She then replied that she came to Portugal to work as an animator who obtained a work contract with Mark Warner. She states that her contract started on March 21, 2007 and ends on November 7, 2007, when she will return to her country. . It specifies that the company in question has, in turn, a contract with the tourist village OCEAN CLUB for the purpose of assuming childcare service whose parents are customers of this village. She adds that in the Village Touristique, this type of daycare takes place in four different places according to the ages of the children. Thus for children from four months to one year is the Baby Club which is near the main reception of the OCEAN CLUB. For children from one year to two years old is the Toddler which is next to Tapas restaurant. For children from three years to five years, it is the Mini Club which is also near the main reception of the Ocean Club. And, finally, the kids from age six to nine and from ten to thirteen, it's the Junior Club that sits next to the Millennium restaurant.
With regard to the hours of operation, they are cut into four services.
- First service: 09:00 to 12:30
- Second service: from 2.30 pm to 5.30 pm
- Third service: From 19:30 to 23:30.
This is a service during the lunch hour called Dining out Service. It is next to the Ocean Club reception.
- Fourth service: 19:30 to 01:00
There is a Babysitting service between 19:30 and 01:00 in the morning, which is available in the apartments of the parents who request it.
The declarant states that the profession of facilitator is the same in all the spaces specified above and that each colleague has a similar training. He is planning to do rotations, that is to say they would change space from week to week changing the child group they should be dealing with.
It specifies quinhérent to the function, it is obliged to elaborate a weekly plan of the activities to develop with the children who are entrusted to them, in particular with the outside, as for example the swimming, tennis, beach ...
To our question, she specifies who is responsible for a band of children similar to that of the missing minor and that each monitor has about seven children and that he stays with the same monitor during the week.
Still answering our question, she says she's been acquainted with the McCann family since last Sunday, April 29th, when McCann's parents placed their daughter at the Mini Club. She adds that until Thursday, May 3, the girl came every day.
Questioned, she replies that since the girl's care, it seemed to her that her parents were paying attention to their daughter because they asked what Madeleine had done at the daycare and that even, they accompanied Madeleine a few times in certain outdoor activities. As for the girl, she says that it is an active and sociable child. Only the first day, she was more distant with the group.
The declarant reports that during the period when Madeleine was entrusted to her care, at certain times, the girl seemed to her sad or dissatisfied without, however, making any particular comments regarding the fact that she was angry, sad or dissatisfied with anything. is. She also reports that she was an obedient child who never left the group and never spoke to strangers.
Questioned, the declarant replied that it was always the parents who brought and came to find Madeleine at the Mini Club.
When questioned, she replied that in the performance of her duties, both inside the facilities and outside (as described above), she had never noticed anyone in particular or a suspect who was observing the children she was caring for. She did not notice anyone making pictures of the children, especially Madeleine. She said she never heard her colleagues report such a fact either.
The declarant reports that in the context of the disappearance of the minor Madeleine, she saw nothing and knows no plausible reason that could explain the disappearance. Finally, the declarant informs that in recent years she has been practicing this profession for the same company, through various countries, which she has never heard of.
The declarant informs that since then, in addition to the British and her colleagues, she has established knowledge with people outside the tourist enterprise. Some of Portuguese nationality but mostly British who goes out at night for entertainment. And during her evenings, people did not question her about her profession, or about the kids, or about the McCann family in particular.
After reading with the interpreter who explains, persists and signs.
React to this article on the forum |
| KIDS CLUB: Audition by Lindsay Jayne J. |  October 01, 2008
Audition by Lindsay Jayne J.
We are back to our file. Laudition de Lindsay J. takes place on May 06, 2007. This audition is interesting in more than one way. Lindsay J. is responsible for the KIDS CLUB.
In this respect it is stated that:
The declarant is heard as a witness. By virtue of the fact that the declarant is of British nationality and does not speak Portuguese, this statement is taken in the presence of Filipa Maria CS, translator.
The declarant has been in Portugal since 15 March, when she started working for the tourist company The Ocean Club located in Praia Da Luz where she is responsible for the animators of the KIDS CLUB. His contract of employment having been previously signed in London (England).
As part of the duties she carries out within the company mentioned, she has been in touch with a child named Madeleine McCann on a number of occasions. The declarant states that the child belonged to the group MiniClub in which are grouped children from 3 (three) to 5 (five) years.
When asked in greater depth, the reporter informs us that the group of children in the MiniClub category is supervised by her colleague Amy T. who, in turn, coordinates a group of facilitators composed of Catriona B. and Emma W. Both were the week of April 29th to May
4th , 2007. The declarant informs that the MiniClub is subdivided into two classes of children and that Madeleine is entrusted to Catriona B.
The MiniClub is open from 09:00 in the morning. A break is scheduled for lunch between 12:30 and 14:30 and begins the afternoon period until 17:30.
Then, from 19:30, the Kids Club provides a complementary dinner service until 23:30. At an additional cost, parents can get a babysitting service with no set schedule to be determined between the parents and the babysitter.
The children stay in the nursery itself and devote themselves to various activities that can be done within the facilities of the company, for this purpose, or also outside including the beach but always accompanied by a staff of the Kids Club.
The declarant tells us that at a date which can not be specified but which took place last week, Madeleine McCann took part in a boat trip organized by the crèche of the company. Several children participated in this trip at sea, accompanied by the above mentioned employees and a specialist in aquatic activities whose name she does not know.
At our request, the declarant states that Madeleine McCann was accompanied by her parents, Kate and Gerald McCann, who rented the G5A apartment in the OCEAN CLUB.
She indicates that on May 3, 2007, around 10:20 pm, she was informed by her colleague Amy T. that Madeleine McCann had disappeared. On this she immediately launched the missing child procedure. This procedure consists of dividing several parts of the business that are entrusted to different employees of the company so as to search for the missing child. For this purpose, the declarant explains that, around 22h25, on the date indicated, began the said procedure by having divided the whole enterprise into three distinct sectors. Namely, the northern zone, the central zone (including the sector of the company) and all the roads that surround the company and that go to the beach. Five employees of the company were mobilized to coordinate the research assisted by various people (other employees, tourists and residents).
Later, not knowing the exact time, the Local Police went to the company and, taking into account the procedure we had set up, started the respective measures for this type of situation.
Questioned by us, the declarant indicates that the search for the members of the OCEAN CLUB ended around 4:00 am on the morning of May 4, with no result.
At our request, the declarant states that at the time she was informed of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, she was alone in her residence and immediately left and started the procedure described above. To our questions, the declarant replied that since she was not in direct contact with the minor in question, Madeleine McCann, being only the person in charge of the animators of the company's nursery, that consequently she does not know the habits of the minor or her parents and that no suspicious or special situation concerning the child was reported to her during the period she worked in Portugal.
The Applicant did not notice other types of suspicious or unusual situations that could be directly or indirectly related to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
After reading, in the company of the interpreter who explains to him, nothing else to add, persists and signs.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Eddy and Keela: what the file says. | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  24 September 2008
Inspection of the apartments.
Date: July 31, 2007 - 8:00 pm Report:
Speakers:
PJ: Tavares A. Ricardo P.
UK Inspectors : Mark Harrison, Martin Grime (UK Forensic Canine P SM Expert), Eddy Keela (English Springers)
and: Silvia B. Manager of the OCEAN CLUB Complex.
At that time, inspections were conducted in the apartments occupied by members of the McCann family and the group that accompanied them at the time of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. It is only on this date that the apartment, identified by the parents, is empty thus allowing the additional investigation that has been authorized by the respective occupants. Thus, at the indicated time began the canine research session covering the following apartments:
5A:
From 8:30 pm to 9:20 pm dogs passing by.
8:20 pm: The cadaver scent detector dog marks the area of the couple's memory in the chamber.
8:22 pm: The cadaver scent detector dog marks an area of the living room at the back of the sofa near the street window.
From 8:47 pm to 9:20 pm the dog's blood detector.
8:10 pm: The dog marks an area of the living room at the back of the sofa, on the floor, near the window of the street.
5B:
9:24 pm to 9:27 pm: The cadaver detector dog did not report anything.
5D:
9:29 pm to 9:34 pm: The cadaver detector dog did not report anything.
5H:
21h35 to 21h38: The cadaver detector dog has not reported anything.
4G:
9:42 pm to 9:45 pm: The cadaver detector dog did not report anything.
Garden belonging to the apartment 5A (with access from the balcony and the stairs):
21h49 to 22h00: The cadaver scent detector dog marks an area of the garden vertically of the glass.
Inspection of the surroundings.
Date: August 01, 2007 - 06:00
After an evaluation of the area surrounding the tourist village OCEAN CLUB located in Praia Da Luz, taking into account the characteristic topography of the ground and the distance separating the apartment from which the minor Madeleine McCann disappeared, were carried out an inspection, with the help of dogs specialized in the detection of corpse odor, in various places as described:
1 - 6:40 a perimeter located between Piteira street and Oliveira street was inspected. At 07:15 the inspection ended without anything being detected by the dogs.
2 - 07:25 a perimeter contiguous to the property BEIJAFLOR located street Figueira and bounded by Ramalhete street. The inspection was made in any extension of the ground and nothing unnormal has been reported. The inspection ends at 07:45.
3 - 07:55 a perimeter between the residence Casa Azul street Figueira and the residence Casa Pandora as well as a dirt road on the left of Figueira street was inspected by the dogs without anything nanormal is reported.The inspection ends at 08:05.
4 - 08h20 a perimeter between the residences Casa Pandora street Figueira, Quinta Mimosa and Casa Ladeira was inspected without any unnatural evidence being reported. The inspection ends at 08:40.
In the present, we enclose a photographic report of the places inspected.
First conclusion
To the Coordinator of Criminal Investigation.
Faced with the new elements, revealed by the dog research and attached to the report, and based on the report of Mark Harrison, there is every reason to believe that the minor Madeleine McCann died in the apartment 5A where she spent her holidays with her parents to lOCEAN CLUB from Praia Da Luz. Following the marking of the cadaver detector dogs and traces of human blood inside the apartment where the child disappeared, we carried out further research revealing that there has never been a death or a corpse reported in the same apartment before. In this report, several places have been marked signaling the presence of cadaver odor and human blood. In addition, we can see that a smell of corpse was detected in the garden adjoining the apartment 5A. Nothing has been detected in other homes.
It follows from the present investigation that there are indications, in practice and in fact, of the crime of homicide as defined in ART. QI310 of the Penal Code.
In order to deepen this trail, some of whose results could reveal new evidence, we are seeking the authorization to carry out new inspections, within the legal framework, in two distinct locations:
1 - Rue des Fleurs n ° .. Current residence of the McCann family at Portugal.
2 - Renault Scénic rental vehicle registered .. - DA - 27.
We suggest that this home inspection be assigned to the PJ and ask the MP for a 20-day term. Thus, we consider that there are indications that support the strong suspicions that, within the vehicle used by the McCanns, there is evidence of the crime that is the subject of this motion and, moreover, may reveal elements of fundamental importance. for the investigation.
Villa Street Flowers.
Report:
August 02, 2007 - 18:14 - Das Floras Street, 27 - Praia Da Luz - Lagos
Speakers:
PJ: Ricardo P J. Carlos P., both inspectors.
UK: Mark Harrison, Martin Grime Eddy.
On that date, as part of a home search conducted at the McCann couple's current residence, a dog inspection was conducted. So at the time indicated at the beginning of the report, all parts of the dwelling were inspected and resulted in the following results:
6:36 pm - The dog Eddy, which detects the smell of corpse, marked the area of a wardrobe in the living room.After checking, the dog indicated a pink plush doll belonging to Madeleine McCann.
Clothes.
Date: August 02, 2007 - 23:20.
On that date, following a domiciliary visit taking effect at the current residence of the McCanns, rue des Fleurs, various clothing was collected in a suitable place for that purpose in order to carry out a dog-eye inspection.
The pieces of clothing collected were arranged individually with the agreement and under the instructions provided by the British technicians, the dogs having previously covered the space where the clothes would be deposited.
1 - 23h20: Prior recognition of the premises by the two canine units to ensure that the space was free of all odors sought. The recognition ended at 23:30 without anything being reported by the dogs.
2 - 23h30: A first inspection, by the dog detector of human blood, began with the clothes packed in the box marked: Living room. At 11:40 pm the inspection ended without the dog showing anything abnormal.
11:41 pm: Canine unit corpse detector began inspection and marked various clothing. The inspection ended at 23:52. The clothes were put back in their box for later use.
From 00:02 to 01:30 am (03/08/07) all the other boxes containing the clothes of the twin room, the room of the friends, the room of the couple labeled 1 2, as well as the empty luggage were inspected by the two dogs without conclusive result.
Apartment 5A - OCEAN CLUB
For joining to lacte. It is brought to knowledge and according to superior order that today at 20:00, the specialists of the LPC (Criminal Police Lab), Fernando V. and Lino R., after having seen the recorded images related to the police inspection made on 31/07/07 in the apartment 5A, duly mandated, proceeded to complete mosaic tile collection where the dogs used in the inspection indicated the possible existence of remnants of human blood as well as the presence of a dead body in the apartment. The mosaics were removed in order to preserve any existing remains for analysis by the relevant laboratory. This action was fully filmed in order to illustrate how the sampling was carried out and with which tools so that the experts have a better perception of the work.
Robert Mura / Casa Liliana
Report:
04 05 August 2007.
Residence of the suspect Robert Murat located at Ramalhete street, Casa Liliana - Praia Da Luz - Lagos
Speakers:
PJ: Tavares A. Chief Inspector, J. Carlos P., Ricardo P,
UK inspectors : Mark Harrison, Martin grime and Eddy.
At this date, as part of the home visits, which were carried out at the current home of the suspect ROBERT MURAT, a police dog inspection was carried out in the outdoor gardens and inside the residence of the accused.
04 August 2007 - 19h28: Start of inspection of the gardens of the residence. Eddy, a corpse detector dog, covered the entire outer perimeter of the house and did not report anything.
August 05 2007 - 15h22: The same dog inspected all the rooms of the residence and did not signal anything particular.
RUSSEL OBRIEN
To the coordinator of the Criminal Investigation.
As part of the investigation, we collected information about a vehicle used by RUSSEL OBRIEN friend and member of the group who spent his holidays with the McCann family in the Algarve. When soliciting vehicles considered important for the following acts, we were not aware of the identification elements of this vehicle.In the meantime, our investigation has allowed us to establish that it could be an Opel Corsa-type vehicle registered. - AG - 62. At present, we do not have a search and seizure warrant for the vehicle to reach the vehicle. planned inspections. Therefore, we are asking for such a legal mandate in order to carry out the planned inspections.
Samples sent to the Lab.
Between 15:00 on 04 August 2007 and 06:30 on 05 August 2007, the following samples were collected in the living room of Apartment 5A of the OCEAN CLUB where a homicide probably took place.
Samples 1A to 3B: recovered on the floor.
Samples 4A to 13B: recovered on the wall
Samples 14A to 15B: recovered at the back of the sofa.
Sample 16A: Recovered from the Blue Curtain
Sample 16B: Recovered from the white curtain behind the blue curtain.
All of these items were delivered to the Birmingham Legal Science Laboratory (FSS)
Samples recovered in the car.
Between 06 August 2007 21:30 and 07 August 2007 at 06:00 am, were recovered the following samples in the car Renault Scénic gray:
On the driver's side:
1A: Hair.
1B: Fiber and hair.
1C: Fibers and bristles
1D: Nail
On the front passenger side:
2A: Hair
2B: Hair
2C: Fibers and hair
2D: Fibers and hair
2E: Nail
Between the seats:
3A: Hair
Back seat:
4A: Hair
4B: Fibers and bristles
4C : Fiber and hair
Central upholstery:
5A: hair
5B: Fibers and bristles
5C: Fibers and bristles
Bench right side:
6A: Hair
6B: Fibers and bristles
6C: Fibers and hairs
Luggage compartment (trunk):
7A: Hair
7B: Fibers and bristles
7C: Fibers
8A: Hair
8B: Fibers and bristles
8C: Fibers and bristles
9, 10 and 11: Hair
12: Car key
13 : Sample seat fabric samples
All delivered to the Birmingham FSS for analysis.
React to this article on the forum
|
| a suspect (continuation and end ...) | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  22 September 2008
Field investigation
It is May 05, 2007. Two days after the disappearance of Madeleine McCann:
At this date we carry out investigation complements in order to gather information in the context of the act.To this end, was covered all the tourist company called THE OCEAN CLUB located in Praia Da Luz. The business consists of several apartment blocks, as well as small dwellings spread over four buildings, separated only by streets or shrubs, called Waterside Garden, Waterside Village, Club Cottage and Ocean Club Gardens.Another building, contiguous to the OCEAN CLUB but not belonging to the same company, called CRISTALUZ was visited. In this way, 443 dwellings were visited and all the respective inhabitants were identified and questioned about the information they could have about the disappearance of the minor Madeleine McCann,while checking for any suspicious situations or attitudes as well as their criminal record. Also inspected were unoccupied homes, which we had access to thanks to the staff of the tourism business. This complement was carried out by 6 teams of JP inspectors assisted by various staff members of the OCEAN CLUB.
Hearing of Lance R.
The interested party introduces himself to us as a witness. Being a foreign citizen, he does not master the Portuguese language so the Inspector JD, present at this hearing, will assist the declarant as interpreter, who declares:
He has been a permanent resident for two years and lives in Praia Da Luz where he owns a condominium apartment with his parents. And that professionally, he manages various properties of others. He is aware of the facts that concern us and for which he presents himself to us via the media and especially through the channel Sky News. During the door-to-door interview conducted by the PJ investigators yesterday, giving him a descriptive description of a potential suspect and a description of the clothes worn by the same suspect, the informant recalled having seen someone resembling this description there. has two weeks. The said person was seen by the declarant on several occasions in Praia Da Luz. This is a person about 30/40 years old, skinny, about 1.70m, usually dressed in dark, wearing jeans, swarthy and dark hair. The declarant does not recall any other details concerning the individual but he could recognize it if this person was presented to him personally or in photo. The declarant states that he saw the individual on the access road to Praia Da Luz and near the pharmacy on Helena do Nascimento Baptista Street, still in Praia Da Luz. The declarant had only visual contact with the suspect, having seen him on foot and alone. The declarant informs the PJ only because the person he is talking about corresponds to the profile described by the PJ investigators and the individual does not fit with the usual tourists in Praia Da Luz. The declarant will be interviewed by our portraitists to establish a drawing / technical illustration of the person to whom it refers, bearing the n ° 19/2007. The declarant wishes to add that the individual appeared to him to suffer from slight psychological disturbances. The declarant has nothing more to add. After reading with the interpreter accompanying the present act which explains him, persists and signs.
Suspicious vehicle
Ask our Vehicle Registration Register to highlight all Renault Clio vehicles whose last four digits are: AV-67. It appears that the vehicle in question is registered. . - AV - 67 and whose owner is a rental agency without driver.
Rental vehicle
At the head office of the self-driving car rental company Luzcar rent a car, we request that they provide us with all information relating to the vehicle bearing the registration mark ..- AV-67 during the period from 28/04/07 to the date of this further investigation. It was possible to determine that the vehicle was rented on April 28, 2007 at Faro Airport by a Polish citizen named WK and who lives in Solimar in Burgau where he booked the accommodation via internet. In this we attach to this copy of the reservation email. The Polish citizen paid the reservation via the credit card No. 5 185 .... .... .... ... valid until May 2008. The contract was finalized by an employee of the agency, Nelson M., of which we add the hearing. We enclose a photocopy of the rental agreement. The vehicle was brought back to the lessor on 05 May 2007 at the Faro airport and has already been re-rented according to the information provided by Luis F., an employee of the Agency.Currently the vehicle is rented by Clere E. sis park da Floresta No. .. in Budens, Vila do Bispo.
We did some research to find out where WK was staying. He lived in apartment No. Ed. Solimar, Ficticia Street, Budens. This apartment is managed by the ATB company on Principale Street, Marretas Building, Burgau, Vila do Bispo whose director is the Nuno F. we contacted.
This apartment is owned by Peter and Margaret O. resident at Windsor Grove, Cardiff, Wales. We enclose herewith a photocopy of documents allowing complete identification of Peter and Margaret O. as well as the copy of the rental documents. It should be noted that since the departure of WK, the apartment has not had other tenants. A key to the apartment is given to us to carry out any further investigation deemed necessary.
Interpol
In the context of the investigation into the disappearance of the British minor Madeleine McCann, in Praia da Luz, on the night of May 3, 2007, it is of vital interest for the investigation that the competent authorities investigate the citizens of Polish nationalities, whose elements known are WK, holder of Polish driving license No. 6307 ... and Anetta K., partner of WK, to tell us if they have a criminal record. They arrived at Faro Airport on 28 April 2007 on Air Berlin flight AI32744 and departed faro today via Air Berlin flight AB2745. We also request information on the end destination of these two passengers.
Following investigation ...
In order to determine the whereabouts of the couple of Polish nationality who spent a holiday in Burgau, we make representations to several commercial establishments and based on the description we had of the couple, the owner of the Beach Bar we notice that it could two of his clients. He seems to remember that the couple had lunch and dinner two or three times without remembering the exact days but it was early in the week. He knows they are Polish because they talked football on the Liverpool / Chelsea match day, stating that Liverpool's goalkeeper was Polish. The match in question took place on May 1, 2007. They also discussed classical music, Portuguese and Brazilian. The couple knows several interpreters from these countries. They asked the bar owner where they could find this kind of music. The owner informed them about the FNAC store at Algarve Shopping or at the Chiado shopping center. They said they would go to Lisbon probably the same day. The couple appeared, at the restaurant, quite atypical usual holidaymakers of this place. They paid in cash. The owner did not detect abnormal behavior of the couple.
The investigation determines that the couple did go to the FNAC at the Chiado Center in Lisbon on May 2, 2007, where they bought two CDs of musicals paid via the credit card No. ... ... ... .... ., the same used to pay the company LUZCAR rent a car for the rental of the vehicle registered ..- AV-67. We captured the video surveillance system and we attach photographs from the FNAC surveillance system where we can see the Polish couple in question.
Nelson M. Hearing
The declarant is heard as a witness. He is employed by the car rental company called Luzcar where he has been working for two years as a receptionist. According to the register it was he who was on duty when renting the vehicle ..- AV-67 Renault Clio 2006, gray color. He delivered the vehicle which, meanwhile, was returned today at 06:45 as stipulated in the register. He does not remember the customer who rented this car because he delivers 30 vehicles a day. But it specifies that the register contains all the useful information:
- The place of delivery
- Date and hour
- Client name
- Exact address of the domicile
- Provisional address in Portugal
- Nationality
- Driver's license
- credit card number
- Private phone number.
He does not remember anything else. After reading, persists and signs.
End of this track and our conclusion:
The suspect couple was clearly identified and was quickly put out of action. The witnesses recognized them in photos. I will pass the explanations of the couple and their alibi which are not of interest since they are innocent. So why this series of articles on a suspect? Simply to show that one or more tracks have been followed with rigor and professionalism. To demonstrate, too, that the robot portrait broadcast in mass by the British press, about a month ago, is not an unknown suspect or an abandoned track. But someone clearly identified in the file that was accessed by journalists, Clarence Mitchell and parents McCann. Finally, I have published these articles because they are contained in the file and we wish to play the transparency in this matter.
In the news
Note that the suspects (Arguidos) had until September 20 to ask the PJ to continue their search for Madeleine McCann. It seems that is not the case. The parents, Gerry and Kate McCann, would not have asked the police to continue their search for Madeleine's disappearance.
react to this article on the forum
|
| |
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#3
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 4:02 PMCopy HTML
September 19, 2008
Hearing of Derek F. (Witness who saw suspicious behavior)
The declarant comes to us as a witness by virtue of the fact that he noticed a suspicious presence in the late morning or early afternoon of 02 and 03 May, which, by his behavior, could be related to the facts currently being investigated. . The declarant does not speak the Portuguese language in a spoken or written way, he will be assisted in his statement by an interpreter by the name of Gaynor Louise CJ
The declarant owns a holiday home on rue do R ... Lot 1 - Apartment 7 - Praia da Luz, where he spends long periods of vacation with his wife, Christine Margaret D. (with whom he has been married for 36 years) years).They both arrived in Portugal on April 28 early in the morning. They settled in the apartment mentioned above. To come back to the fact, the declarant does not remember with precision if it was late morning or early afternoon, still is that the 02 and 03 May, the declarant was walking along the arteries near his place holiday in Praia da Luz with his partner Christine. Passing near the residential block of the OCEAN CLUB, the declarant noticed the presence of a vehicle which he describes as being of commercial type of mark OPEL CORSA (without certainty), white color. He thinks it is an old model.
|
| Eddie and Keela: The videos | Eddie and Keela tracked dogs
A small parenthesis in our publications. We are broadcasting the video of the visit of the apartment 5A in Praia da Luz by the British dogs. Nothing has been changed, removed or added to the original version. Only the name of the journalist publishing his exclusive videos has been added to the film. The video is very heavy, you will need, perhaps, arm yourself patient during the download according to your connection speed and the number of internauts on our server. Thank you for your understanding. The other videos will be published soon but they are already widely available on SOS Madeleine .
In our next publications we will continue to publish the Maddie case by continuing the article on the suspect, started a few days ago.
React to this article on the forum
| |
|
IN THE REST OF WEALTH:
Open Letter from Gonçalo Amaral's Wife
Gonçalo Amaral's wife sends an open letter to Kate McCann.
Dear Madam,
excuse my daring, but after hearing about your comment in your interview with the newspaper Expresso about Gonçalo Amaral, my husband and the father of my daughters, I can not help but direct these words of thanks. I've been trying for years to make myself heard in this feeling that unites us both ... and his behavior is a shame as a professional and as a person ...
Otherwise see:
a) professionally!
As the criminal investigation coordinator of the Judicial Police, my husband has always refused to sit comfortably behind his desk, from 9 am to 5 pm, which is inherent to this category.
Instead, he spent the day (and often the night) with the field investigators, coordinating in loco research, surveillance, capture and other diligences. A shame ! But if it was just being weathered, it would not matter, because as Kate knows, the climate here is not bad. The problem is his devotion to the cause that has cost him a promotion in his career. I will explain myself, because this case is contemporary in search of your daughter. My husband competed in the category of Senior Coordinator, and between seizures of drugs, rapes and homicides, he managed to produce a thesis on drug trafficking via sea, which he defended in Lisbon, in front of a Juri who To congratulate.
Filled with hope, Gonçalo Amaral returns to the Algarve and awaits the result. It is with dizziness that he learns that he has been excluded by other colleagues (coordinators as it should, to tell the truth), because he had not managed to punctuate the parameters of vocational training. Yes, Mrs. Kate, my husband spent his life working, surrounded by complex investigations, it was the man in Portugal who seized the most drugs, but as he did not have time to strut in the corridors of the PJ institution, he was not promoted. A shame, ma'am, a shame!
As you must know, because you seem to me very well informed, the salary of my husband does not arrive at 1.5 times the minimum wage of your country. However, as wife, mother and Portuguese I can not complain, since the salary of Gonçalo Amaral is equivalent to 4.5 times the minimum wage in Portugal. Pay attention to this, which serves as an example of what I am going to expose: at a certain moment, an individual kills an element of the PJ and flee to our neighbor Spain. Between the comings and goings of a PJ team of which my husband was a part, they stayed there more than 15 days. The international cost aid was at that time 100. As Kate can imagine, it's not possible with this amount of eating and sleeping in Spain, let alone when it's Christmas Eve, and this amount would be available (with a little luck) only at Easter. Even so, Gonçalo Amaral has never refused, even for one day, to look for escaped homicide thus increasing our family budget. And this is just one example among many. At a certain point, I suggested to him to create a fund, or something else to deal with his extraordinary expenses, but he never listened to me. While we also had our mortgages paid ... A shame, Ms. Kate, a shame! but he never listened to me. While we also had our mortgages paid ... A shame, Ms. Kate, a shame! but he never listened to me. While we also had our mortgages paid ... A shame, Ms. Kate, a shame!
b) As an individual, his behavior is also a shame, because it has never been possible to distinguish or have privacy with this way of doing the work he has chosen. However, and if my dear friend Mrs Kate allows me, I can give examples:
Five years ago, a child named Joana disappeared. The mother, just like Mrs. Kate, tried to project the case to the social communication, but the farthest she managed was in Sic ... After 8 days, the confessions and the clues occur: In the course of a incestuous act of the mother and the uncle, the child was beaten, later cut in piece and the body arranged we do not know where. The mother and the cloak were imprisoned, with the trial coordinated by Gonçalo Amaral and which cost them almost 20 years of prison each one. But going back a little bit. The child died on September 12th. On Christmas Eve, our family was gathered to begin the prayers, when my husband asked me to prepare a bag with food and warm clothes, because he had not yet practiced his act of contrition and penance. Trying to imagine, Mrs Kate where Gonçalo Amaral headed on that Christmas night when it was raining with torrents and where the thunder was roaring? At the prison of Olhão, where João Cipriano was imprisoned, Joana's cloak, a confessed murderer and a psychopathic psychiatrist. For my husband, giving alms to a beggar represented no sacrifice for him. On the other hand, to join and share his Christmas meal with João Cipriano was the sacrifice he offered to God in memory of Joana. And that's not a shame? Know again, Mrs. Kate, that every year, September 12, my husband asks for a mass for Joana Isabel Cipriano Guerreiro. He says that no one will remember the poor child. But we remember to accuse him unjustly of acts and crimes that he never committed. It's not a shame,
I will tell a last episode, which still costs me to speak. In this year, in May, we started a process of moving our family to Portimão. Supposedly my husband was starting his vacation one day after your daughter's disappearance. For obvious reasons, it did not happen. I started a new job, I looked for houses, I made the move and I tried to integrate our girls in new schools with new routines. All that alone, without any support from my husband, who, for obvious reasons, was looking for your daughter, Mrs. Kate. In October, the day of his birthday, a week after our girls have started the new school year, Gonçalo Amaral is fired and returns to Faro. It was supposed to be a time of family reunion, but in fact it was a separation of more. This is not a shame? Our girls never understood, and we never managed to explain to them that they were the obvious reasons that rewarded a father who left his daughters to look for a child he did not know and whose parents were careless . Too bad that my dear friend Kate was not there anymore, maybe you could have helped us explain the obvious reasons for their father's return to our children!
Finally, about the intimate aspect of Gonçalo Amaral, I can just tell you that it is exactly what the Latinos have as a reputation: a shameless, and my modesty do not allow me to say more.
I ask my dear friend to forgive these thoughts of wife and mother, but I am sure you will understand. I finish this missive by asking you to convey to your mother my most sincere compliments. She seemed very sincere when, in an interview, she said she wanted to slap those who had left her grandsons alone. She spoke so openly that she looked like a true Portuguese grandmother ...
Dear friend Mrs. Kate, I do not want to bother her anymore I would like you to give me one last favor: now that your mouth is leaning towards the truth, do not stop, go on, and tell the truth that the world is waiting to hear .
With best regards,
Sofia Leal
(wife and mother of Gonçalo Amaral's children)
|
| A suspect | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  15 September 2008
A suspect
We are on the second day of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. While the investigation follows are ongoing, a person brings items considered interesting by the investigators. This is how we find in the file the following pages:
I come, in this form, to inform you that:
Today, at 16:40, appeared before us, signatory of the present, the tourist complex OCEAN CLUB, Praia Da Luz, in the block 6, apartment 6 (near the place where the minor, MADELEINE BETH MCCANN has disappeared), a person who has identified himself as DEREK F., contactable via the n ° 912 .... (in Portugal) and via the n ° 0044973 .... (in the UK). This person is a British citizen who is on vacation in Praia Da Luz, near the aforementioned tourist complex, since last week and up to and including May 12, 2007.
Following the disappearance of Madeleine, he comes to inform us of the presence of a suspicious person whom he has seen several times, including 4 times on May 2nd and 5 times on May 3rd during the day (the declarer does not remember but believes that he it is possible until late at night), while he was accompanied by his wife and going to the supermarket Baptiste, to have noticed an individual (about 1.70m, swarthy apparently of Portuguese nationality, one day beard, short black hair, necklace and dressed in a yellow t-shirt) who was walking on the way to look in the direction of the apartment where, later, Madeleine disappeared.The declarant adds that the individual was also looking in the direction of a Van-type white vehicle parked on the other side of the street.
There was, initially, no importance but following the events that occurred later (editor's note: the disappearance of Madeleine), he found it important to inform the authorities judging the attitude of the suspect individual. At the request of the signatory, the witness draws up a sketch identifying by the number 1 the parked vehicle and its meaning and by the number 2 the suspect.
The witness agrees to cooperate fully with the authorities if necessary.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Photographic report.
As part of the continuation of this track, under the guise of this investigation, at 15:00 hours, we had several contacts with various people living in the vicinity of the places where this track starts to check if the witness is wrong or if elements consolidate his claims in the context of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.
The purpose of this additional assignment is to collect any new elements that could contribute to the clarification of the clues collected on the basis of the testimony of a British citizen living in a resort about 300 meters from the place where the minor disappeared.
As a result, a photographic report is made in the Francisco Gentil Martins Avenue located in Praia Da Luz along the OCEAN CLUB apartments.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Madeleine seen in various gas stations: the truth | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  13 September 2008
GALP service area.
While waiting to publish videos of British dogs, Eddie and Keela, pushed back because of a technical problem, we continue our consultation of the file. Before arriving at the chunk of the auditions of September 10, 2007 which marked a turning point in the investigation, we deliver you a document which, if nothing precise to the investigation, will put the pendulums on the hour compared to certain declarations.
The first supplementary investigation was recorded on May 4, 2007, by JC Franco and Carlos L. inspectors, concerning the GALP service in Lagos on the A22.
At this date, around 11:30, at the GALP service station in Lagos, on the A22, we showed all the employees present a photograph of the missing girl. For all employees present, the result was negative. The manager of the service station, Mr. Jorge N., let us view the images recorded by the monitoring system installed. Have been reviewed the images recorded since 03/05/07 at 21:00 until today 12:00. In these images, at around 11:10 on May 4, 2007, it was possible to see a couple, accompanied by a female child with similar characteristics to the missing minor. Photographic prints were printed for analysis. We also asked that the film be kept for future analysis. In the service lane located in the other direction on the A22, photographs of the missing minor were shown to employees with the same negative result. The surveillance circuit images were viewed to verify if there were any useful elements for the current investigation. The result was negative. This additional assignment was completed at around 17:00 and it was not possible to gather any better or other necessary items. Which act. Signature of the two inspectors. Which act. Signature of the two inspectors.Which act. Signature of the two inspectors.
indictment
In the interest of the ongoing police investigation, an indictment is given in order to provide us with the images, of the CCTV circuit installed in the service lane, between 11:05 and 11:35 on May 04, 2007. Images that show a female child with the characteristics physical resembling the minor disappeared in the night from 03 to 04 May in Praia Da Luz. These images must be captured for future analysis.
Signed: Coordinator of Criminal Investigation, Gonçalo Amaral.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Alcufeira petrol station
The facts are May 04, 2007 and were recorded in writing on May 05, 2007.
Following a police communication stating that in the morning, a blue Renault vehicle with license plate AQ -...- .. came to fill up at the Posto Repsol station at Vale Paraiso - Albufeira. The driver was Caucasian, average height, about 50/60 years old, and was accompanied by a female child, fair-skinned, blond hair, about 3 or 4 years old. Ladulte, after refueling, went inside the shop to pay cash, went out to get back to his car. The vehicle left the premises to go to Albufeira. One of the station's employees, named Rute, contacted the police via his mobile phone number 96-796 .... and communicated this information after being informed of the disappearance of minor Madeleine. On the spot, in the station referred to above, it was possible to obtain a cd-rom containing the recorded images of the situation described and which were immediately viewed. Several searches were also carried out to clarify the situation and to identify the stakeholders. It appears that the vehicle Renault, model 9, of blue color, four doors, with registration AQ -..- .. is not to look for. Is in good standing and in good standing of compulsory technical control 17AG ..... dAlbufeira. The vehicle is registered in the name of José dos RQ domiciled Rue ... N ° .. Almada and identity card holder n ° ..... (Editor's note: here we skip some technical lines internal to the police which consists of check the criminal record and consult certain files). it was possible to obtain a cd-rom containing the recorded images of the situation described and which were immediately viewed. Several searches were also carried out to clarify the situation and to identify the stakeholders. It appears that the vehicle Renault, model 9, of blue color, four doors, with registration AQ -..- .. is not to look for. Is in good standing and in good standing of compulsory technical control 17AG ..... dAlbufeira. The vehicle is registered in the name of José dos RQ domiciled Rue ... N ° .. Almada and identity card holder n ° ..... (Editor's note: here we skip some technical lines internal to the police which consists of check the criminal record and consult certain files). it was possible to obtain a cd-rom containing the recorded images of the situation described and which were immediately viewed. Several searches were also carried out to clarify the situation and to identify the stakeholders. It appears that the vehicle Renault, model 9, of blue color, four doors, with registration AQ -..- .. is not to look for. Is in good standing and in good standing of compulsory technical control 17AG ..... dAlbufeira. The vehicle is registered in the name of José dos RQ domiciled Rue ... N ° .. Almada and identity card holder n ° ..... (Editor's note: here we skip some technical lines internal to the police which consists of check the criminal record and consult certain files).
After editing and printing the images contained on the Posto Repsol CD-ROM and were shown to the parents of the missing minor the same day. Differences exist with the missing minor that led us to conclude that it was not the same person. The main difference lies in the fact that this minor has long hair up to half back, obviously longer than the missing minor, the latter having not had time to let her hair grow to the same length, since the speed hair growth average is of the order of 1 cm per month (scientifically proven data). We attach copies of the different printed photos.
Act of photographic recognition.
On May 4, 2007 at the Criminal Investigation Department of Portimao, Judiciary Police, in front of us, Inspector Carlos L and Inspector J. Franco, appeared GERALD PATRICK MCCANN and KATE MARIE HEALY, better identified in the authentic act.
In order to proceed with the photographic recognition of the images collected in the investigation complements. On the basis of the elements provided, we showed them pictures of children of the same sex and similar age as the missing minor, harvested (note: in petrol stations). They were asked if they recognized the child on one of the pictures. They told us that they did not recognize the children in the photos. To join in, duly signed by all stakeholders, marking their agreement.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Statements by TAPAS employees | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  September 11, 2008
We are still in the aftermath of Madeleine's disappearance on May 4, 2007. The rest of the file contains the statements of the members of the restaurant TAPAS and the spontaneous statements of. ..
JEREMY MICHAEL WILKINS.
Following the various informal conversations within the research area, we were contacted by a British citizen named Jeremy Michael Wilkins, holder of the passport No. 205 ......., carrying the mobile phone no +44788 ......, resident at ... London .... He spends his vacation at WATERSIDE GARDEN, block 4G about 50 meters from the apartment where the minor was. He tells us that yesterday, between 8:30 pm and 9:00 pm, while he was in the TAPAS restaurant, he found that a person of about 1.70m, long blonde hair and long, apparently Rasta type and dressed in military green clothes, entered the restaurant. That this person stayed there for a short time, what a strange behavior and what seemed to be a little nervous. He was alone, he did not speak with anyone and left shortly after. The depositor claims to have never seen this person in the village.
Note: The TAPAS bar is annexed to the restaurant where the parents of Madeleine were dining during her alleged disappearance.
TAPAS
Today, we go to the TAPAS restaurant, owned by the OCEAN CLUB in Praia Da Luz, where we collect the statements of several employees. The subject of the statements focused on the disappearance of the little Madeleine McCann as well as on the behavior of the group members who dined in the same restaurant and from the same country as the missing person and on a suspect person with blond rastas.
JERONIMO TOMAS RODRIGUES S.
Bar employee:
He saw the missing minor, Madeleine McCann, for the last time yesterday at 4:45 pm at the restaurant. He did not notice if, in the group of British citizens - 8 or 9 - who dined yesterday at the restaurant (which includes the parents of the missing minor), if someone was absent during dinner.
He saw a walkie talkie on the group table that they used to monitor their children from a distance. He did not see anyone with blond rastas during the night he worked.
SVETLANA SV
Russian Citizen - Kitchen Assistant:
She reports that yesterday, a person who believes he is the father of the missing, left the table where he had dinner with a group of friends (8 or 9) for about 30 minutes. After returning, a woman, who believes to be the wife of the latter, left, in turn, the table and after a while, all the guests left the table except for an older lady who told colleagues declarant, that the child had disappeared. During the time she worked, between 2:30 pm and 11:00 pm, she did not see anyone with blond rastas.
MIGUEL SC
Cook:
He does not know the missing minor or his parents. He only knows they are part of a group of British citizens who usually dined at TAPAS. As he works in the kitchen, he rarely goes to the dining room. He did not see anything particular. He did not see anyone with blond rastas while he worked (14:30 - 23:00).
JOAQUIM JOSE MB
Waiter:
From the group of 8/9 British citizens who yesterday dined at the restaurant, as they usually do, which includes the parents of the missing minor, he noticed that only two people, male, have left the table.
The first to sabsenter was about 40 to 45 years old (tall, lean, white skin, graying hair) and left the table for a period of about 15 minutes. He remembers because it was necessary to warm up his dish which had cooled.
The second (about 40 to 45 years of age, with the same characteristics of the first but with less hair less bulky) was absent about 30 minutes. Shortly after he returned, the whole group left the table, except for one elderly person who told him that a child had disappeared. That was a daughter of a member of the group and that is why he thought that the second to be absent could be the father of the child. Sometimes when the group came to dine at the restaurant, someone from the group was sabotaging to check the apartments for the condition of the children who were sleeping. He did not see anyone with blond rastas during his service (4:00 - 12:00).
JOELSON FABIO SSL
Was contacted at another restaurant of the group located in the same locality.
- As he works in the office, he never has a view of the room where the tables are, which is why he did not see anything.
- He does not know the missing minor or his parents.
- He did not see anyone with blond rastas during his service (15:30 - 23:30).
RICARDO ALEXANDRE DLO
Being on leave, today, he was contacted by phone.
Room Clerk:
From the group of 8/9 British citizens who dined yesterday at the restaurant, as they do regularly, which include the parents of the missing minor, he noticed that a man was absent for about 15 minutes (Grand, normal stature, white skin, light brown hair). The declarant states that it is customary for someone in the group to go to check the apartments where the children slept. On the table he noticed the presence of an intercom. He did not see anyone with blond rastas during his service (16h00 - 00h30).
MARIA MANUELA AJ
Kitchen staff:
Since she was not on duty at the dinner yesterday and the time the child was missing, we did not collect her statement.
SUSPECT WITH RASTAS
At the reception of the OCEAN CLUB complex, open 24h / 24h, the signatory of the present act, was able to observe a person with long hair, curly, blond rastas, with a green Sweatshirt corresponding to the description of the man with rastas. The receptionist stated that this person and his wife are guests of the hotel unit and that he has been tireless since yesterday in the search for the missing child. The signatory encloses, in annex of the present deed, a photocopy of their passport as well as the registration register of the complex.
Which act.
Editor's note: the suspect with rastas and his wife are of British nationality. They are respectively 37 and 40 years old.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Hearing the Kids Club Staff | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  08 September 2008
End of the first auditions of the group.
At this stage of the file, the first hearings of the group are momentarily closed. Parallel to these hearings, the Portuguese police have not remained inactive. The file includes, the day after the disappearance of Madeleine many documents:
- Copies of airline tickets
- Copies of ID cards
- Passport copies
- A complete photographic report (with measurement) of the apartment and the immediate exteriors.
- A plan of the apartment
- Fax copies concerning Madeleine's disappearance report.
- Notification of reporting at the Schengen area.
- A photo attached to the report
- A map of the tourist complex
- A photo report of the surrounding streets
- The list of calls received and sent by Kate Healy between April 27 and May 4 with her cellphone.
- The list of calls received and issued by Gerry McCann on May 4th with his cell phone (previous calls having been cleared).
- Copies of all the identity cards of the Kids Club employees (of which we publish the auditions below)
- Photocopies of the passports of these same employees.
- Copies of the Kids Club registers from April 29th to May 4th included. (We will talk about it again).
The list of documents on file as of May 4th is not complete. It continues after the documents concerning the hearings of the members of the staff of the Kids Club and the documents of seizures of the book of Madeleine, of which we will speak now.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Madeleine's book.
Madeleine McCann's parents tore up the two blankets, front and back, with a book belonging to Madeleine to indicate on the back the timing of each. Russell OBrien participated in the development of this timing. The book was seized by the GNR the very night of the disappearance. It should be noted that the writing of the timing on the back cover of this book was made before the arrival of the police on the spot. These covers of the book will be added to the file, as part of the investigation on September 7, 2007 although seized during the night of May 3 to 4. Here is how the entry document was established:
Entry term:
On that date, it is considered of interest for the investigation to attach to this Act, two blankets of a child's book, on the back of which is written by hand, by one of the members of the group of McCann couple friends and intervening in the name of Russell OBrien , a control schedule.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Description and result.
Today we speak with Mrs. Silvia Maria CRB, manager of handling and services company GREENTROUST, who runs the company OCEAN CLUB, by phone via the mobile phone No. 964 ........
Through it, we contacted Donna Louise RH (contacted by mobile phone n ° 964 .....) responsible for the employees of the crèche, belonging to the company MARK WARNER, responsible for Madeleine and the twins for a few days since the arrival of the McCann family in Portugal.
The latter informs us that all these employees are trustworthy. They are British and have been working in Portugal since March / April until November. Donna Louise RH gives us the names and phones of the thirteen people who work in the nursery.
- Pauline Francis M.
- Emma Louise W.
- Sarah Elizabeth W.
- Susan Bernadette O.
- Leanne Danielle W.
- Shinead Maria V.
- Jacqueline Mary W.
- Kirsty Louise M.
- Lynne RF
- Catriona Treasa Sisile B.
- Stacey P.
- Lindsay Jayne J.
- Amy Ellen T.
We note that all these girls do not live near the complex but close and that Catriona B. was responsible for Madeleine for the day yesterday. Stacey P. was the manager for the McCann twins. It appears that it is always the same girl who takes care of the same child. The last arrivals in Portugal are Sarah W. and Charlotte Pennington who arrived last Saturday, April 28, 2007. The coordinating declarant distributed the children among several girls, taking care that each child is a foreigner. every young girl. The declarant has not noticed anything unusual so far and no one is absent from work except those who are on leave. |
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
CATRIONA B.
In our informal conversation with Catriona Trease Sisile B., also known as CAT, she reports:
1 - What happened on March 21, 2007 and what plans her return to the UK for November 07, 2007.
2 - What did she do Madeleine since Sunday, April 29, 2007, daily until yesterday and what has always been the same schedule.
3 - Quhier, Madeleine arrived at 09h10. It's his dad, Gerry, who drives her.
4 - That it is his mom Kate who resumed at 12:25.
5 - Qua her mom Kate left Madeleine at 14:50 and the recovery at 17:30.
6 - That in the same room as Madeleine, there were 6 other children in the morning and 4 in the afternoon (including Madeleine).
7 - Which did not see anyone unknown in the complex during this period.
8 - That Madeleine, at the first day, was shy. The next days she was calmer and uninhibited. Yesterday, she was happy. (Editor's note: textually as in the file).
9 - What never left Madeleine, always keeping her under visual control for the entire time she was under her responsibility.
10 - What did not notice any change in behavior of the parents of the minor over the days.
11 - What does not report any abnormal behavior with regard to this family.
12 - That Madeleine did not report to her having had contacts with people these last days, nor conversations that would be possibly suspicious.
STACEY P.
In our informal interview with Stacey P., she reports:
1 - That she and her colleague, Shinead, are used to dealing with twins.
2 - Quhier, it is the declarante Satcey who took care of the twins, her colleague being on leave.
3 - That the children were left by their parents at 09:30 and that the mother recovered them at 12:30.
4 - That dad, Gerald, who deposited them at 14:30 and that it is the mother, Kate, who came to get them at 17:30.
5 - Which did not see anyone unknown in the vicinity.
6 - That the parents' behavior has always been perfectly normal.
7 - What happened in Portugal on March 18th and what is back in the UK on November 7th.
It is understood that it has not been possible to hear the rest of the girls, and especially the name of Shinead, by virtue of the fact that most of them are absent and we will set other priority duties for this purpose. |
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Our conclusion:
From a purely police point of view, at this stage of the investigation, disregarding all that we already know, keeping in mind only the elements of the record, dated May 4, which we have published, we can already draw conclusions or at least ask a few questions.
In addition to some inconsistencies in the group's auditions, there are serious anomalies in Matthew Oldfield's. Thus, referring to the plan attached to the file and published opposite, it is noticeable that the door of the children's room opens to the inside right. Thus, if the door was open, it is impossible to see the twins WITHOUT seeing Madeleine in her bed! The question that must come to the mind of any good investigator: is it a mistake or a lie? Matthew Oldfield would be an accomplice to the kidnapping? Or just disturbed? In all good logic, the survey manager must request that new hearings be taken from the group to clarify these areas. What the PJ did 6 days later. These new hearings were more complete and more thorough.
Another question concerning the children's book. Why did you set a timing of checks before the police arrived? While at this moment three other hypotheses are open:
1 - Madeleine is out and gone astray.
2 - Madeleine is out and injured and finds herself stuck somewhere
3 - Madeleine is hiding to make a joke to her parents.
Why fill this timing instead of looking for Madeleine?
Why is Russell taking care of Gerald's name on the back of one of the two blankets?
Why insist heavily, emphasizing by two features, that at 9:00 pm ALL shutters down? (ALL the shutters were down)
The fear of being pursued for negligence by devising a timetable instead of looking for madeleine? Hard to believe, as much as each member of the group recognizes in his hearing to have left the children alone every night since the beginning of the holidays! At this point, this timing is a troubling element but nothing more.
Later, we learn in the file, that it was the favorite book of Madeleine who liked to watch the evening before falling asleep. This reinforced the suspicions of the police by indicating that this book was an attempt to manipulate the investigation.
React to this article on the forum |
| Russell OBrien's audition | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  06 September 2008
Hearing of Russell OBrien.
Laudition begins May 04, 2007 at 21:45.
In this regard we act that:
Being a British citizen and not understanding the Portuguese language, either in its written form, or in its verbal form, the declarant is accompanied in his statements by a sworn translator: Filipa M.
The declarant fully corroborates the statements by his partner Jane Tanner and his mother-in-law Rachael Mampilly. Hearing taken by the signatory of this Act, JC Police Inspector. With respect to the trip, group formation, and routines of the adults and children in this group, of which the reporter is a member of the OCEAN CLUB, he states that:
He is on holiday together, apart from his companion, his children, three-year-old Emma OBrien and one-year-old Emmie OBrien. He practices the profession of doctor. He is a colleague of Gerald (Gerry) McCann who worked for six months directly together. Her partner became pregnant around the same time as Gerry's wife.The declarant's daughter, Emma, has more or less a month of difference with Madeleine Beth McCann. Emma and Madeleine stayed in the same room of the KIDS CLUB near the reception. The officials were some Cat and another named Emma.
Until May 3, 2007, he was not aware that anything suspicious or strange happened in the group or with the children. Everyone seemed normal to him from the cleaning staff, the gardeners and the rest of the resort staff. In Paria he never noticed anything strange or people who could have looked in a strange way so as to attract his suspicions.
Yesterday, as his daughter Emie was feeling bad, the declarer filed Emma OBrien at the KIDS CLUB only around 10:00 am after having breakfast. He corroborates completely the statements of his companion Jane Tanner on the rest of the day.
Around 19:15 / 19:30 the declarant went to his apartment. He told stories to those girls whose Emie was feeling better. Jane's companion went to dinner at the TAPAS restaurant around 8:30 pm, he went there around 8:45 pm. Upon arrival at the restaurant almost all adults were present without children except for David, Fiona and Dianne. They arrived more or less 5 minutes later.
Around 9:00 pm they all ordered the meal. While eating, it was normal that every 15 minutes one person from each apartment went to check if the children were ok. Yesterday, as Emie was not well the interval between checks was reduced. He recalls that Matthew Oldfield left the restaurant shortly after 9:00 pm to check on the children. It's no longer certain who came out first, but five minutes later, Gerry McCann and his own mate, Jane, went out to check on the kids almost simultaneously. He thinks Gerry had to go out first because Jane saw her talking to someone on vacation at the resort, a certain Jez. He thinks Jane only checked their apartment, being worried about Emie. Then Gerry came back around 9:25 pm / 9:30 pm and they started eating the appetizers.
Around 21:35 / 21:40, taking advantage of the break between two dishes, the declarant went out of the restaurant with Matthew to check the children. When he arrived, his daughter Emie cried. He stayed in his room with her. He assumes that Matthew checked his apartment. Matthew returned to the restaurant five minutes after leaving. Her partner came to replace him in Emme's room about 15 minutes after dinner was over.
Around 9:55 pm he returned to the restaurant where his plate had been lying for 5 to 10 minutes. All the other adults had finished.
Around 10:00 pm Kate Healy came out to check her children in her apartment. When she came back, she went to our table, shouting that Madeleine had disappeared. We all ran out and with the help of a few people, we decided to look around for blocks of apartment. The results of the search were unsuccessful.
After reading with the translator who explains, persists and signs.
React to this article on the forum |
| Dianne Webster | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  02 September 2008
Audition of Dianne Webster.
Laudition begins May 04, 2007 at 20h50. Given that the declarant does not speak the Portuguese language, either verbally or in spoken form, an interpreter is used: Natalia C.
In this respect, we act as follows:
The declarant is heard as a witness . She is part of the group that traveled to Portugal with the parents of the minor Madeleine. This is the mother of FIONA. She accompanied this one, her husband and her two grandchildren. She has known the parents of the missing minor, Kate and Gerald, for about four years, through her daughter. Since then, they have become friends.
She states that the McCann couple with three children, a couple of two-year-old twins and Madeleine, almost four years old. She thinks that the idea of coming to Portugal comes from her daughter. She believes that her daughter knew Portugal.
The declarant arrived in Portugal on 28 April at around 12.20 pm / 12.30 pm From Leicestershire to Faro and finally Praia Da Luz. From Faro to OCEAN CLUB they traveled with a shuttle bus from the airport. After the CHEK IN, she was housed in the G5H apartment with her family (daughter, son-in-law and two grandchildren).
With regard to routine habits, the declarant informs that only part of the afternoon was spent with her family and not always. Sometimes she read, did some shopping, or did other things. When in the mornings, she only had lunch with her family on a Wednesday, because it was raining. The other days she spent her morning playing tennis.
As for yesterday, she went to the beach with her grandchildren, son-in-law and daughter. They arrived there around 15:45 and left around 6:15 pm to go to tennis where she stayed until 19:00. The declarant then went to the apartment with her grandchildren and ten minutes later, her step son David, joined them. With the help of her son-in-law, they gave the children a bath.
They left the apartment at around 8.45 pm and accompanied by his son-in-law and his daughter, they went to join the rest of the group at TAPAS restaurant. At dinner, among the other friends, was the McCann couple. To our question, the declarant tells us that since her daughter had an intercom allowing to hear if the children screamed or if they cried, no one would ever check on the spot. However, she reports that both Kate and Gerald have gone several times, and regularly, as well as other couples, to see if the children are doing well.During one of these checks, Kate came back, frightened and nervous, even panicked, telling the restaurant that Madeleine had disappeared.
They immediately organized research groups, either in the apartment, thinking what could be hidden there, or outside. Despite the help of the employees of the OCEAN CLUB, the research was unsuccessful.
The declarant does not know Madeleine well, because she lives far away from the McCanns, and she can not give a rigorous description of Madeleine's personality. She reports, however, that Madeleine was calm but active and dynamic and well educated. She is a beautiful and attractive child.
During this vacation period, she did not notice anything abnormal or could be related to the investigation.
It has no other elements to provide. After reading with the interpreter who explains to him, persists and signs.
The rest of lactualité ...
European justice is debated in terms of judicial cooperation, notably by setting up a European alert system for missing children.
Here is the press release concerning the early warning system for missing children:
Inspired by the case of Madeleine McCann, the written declaration that will be formally adopted this week in plenary calls on the Member States to implement a European alert system in case of child disappearance. Among the measures to be taken is the immediate transfer of the identity of the missing child to the media, the border police, customs and police, and the establishment of a special telephone number (116 000).
Debated as of September 08, 2008.
Comment on this article on the forum |
| Rachael Mampilly marries Oldfield | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  01 September 2008
Hearing of Rachael Mariamma Jean Mampilly marries Oldfield.
In this regard we act that:
Being of British citizenship and not understanding the Portuguese language in its spoken or written form, the undersigned is accompanied by a sworn translator: Filipa MCS Laudition starts May 4, 2007 at 19h20.
Since last Saturday, April 28, 2007, she is on holiday in Portugal and more specifically at the OCEAN CLUB Tourist Complex in Praia Da Luz with her husband Matthew Oldfield. They traveled from London to Faro Airport with their 19-month-old daughter Gaëlle. This trip was organized for a group of nine adults and eight children. Besides her husband and daughter, belong to the group:
- The couple Russel OBrien and Jane Michelle Tanner with their daughters Emma OBrien aged three and a half and Emie OBrien 19 months.
- David and Fiona Payne with their daughters Leah aged three and Sandy aged 12 months.
- Gerald (Gerry) McCann and Kate McCann with their twins, Sean and Amelie aged 26 months each and Madeleine 4 years old.
In the group there is still Diane Webster, mother of Fiona Payne.
These holidays were organized in groups because the men in the group are all doctors apart from Fiona Payne and Kate McCann who have worked together for a long time. It is normal to organize a common holiday for the whole group even though during last holidays, last September, Gerry McCann and Kate McCann did not go to Greece with the group.
The declarant has known the couple Gerry and Kate since 2003. Her husband, Matthew, meanwhile knew them already. Arriving at the airport, they were transported to the club via a Mark Warner bus. In this bus there were other people outside the group. They settled at the OCEAN CLUB in Praia Da Luz.
All couples stayed in their individual apartments, within the same complex, with their respective children.The days, from their arrival until last night when Madeleine disappeared, took place in the same way.
After breakfast, taken between 8:00 and 9:00 at the Millennium restaurant, she drove her daughter to the Kids Club at approximately 10 minutes walk from her apartment. The other couples were doing exactly the same thing, with the exception of Gerry and Kate McCann, who were having breakfast in their apartment. The declarant's daughter was in a Kids Club room near the TAPAS restaurant. Madeleine was in another room because she is older, located near the club reception.
After leaving her daughter, the declarant was taking tennis lessons between 11:00 and 12:00. Then she went back to the kids club to pick up her daughter, Gaëlle, for lunch. She was having Gaëlle's meal and then they went to the apartment of Russell OBrien or David Payne, where they ate together. Only Gerry and Kate McCann had lunch in their apartment with the twins and Madeleine. As the declarant once said, the McCann family had lunch at the beach.
All the members of the group did their shopping in the only existing supermarket near the complex, named Baptiste
She never saw any suspicious attitude, or never had suspicions towards the one or the other person that crossed, as much in their individual activities as in the group with children.
His relationship with the couple Gerry and Kate is a good friendship and they meet occasionally at parties, weddings and birthdays.
About Madeleine, she is a happy child, well disposed and full of energy. She believes that it is not possible for a stranger to take her without crying or crying. It is a malignant child who knows how to distinguish right from wrong.
TAPAS
They used to go every evening to dinner at the TAPAS restaurant, which is about 50 meters away from the apartments, but 60-70 meters around the building to enter from behind.
Yesterday, around 20:45, they joined the rest of the group to dine at the tapas restaurant as every night. Her husband Matthew went to pick up David Payne and Fiona Payne. Around 9:00 pm, the couple arrived two or three minutes after Matthew. He had gone to check the children's rooms. His own apartment where his daughter slept but also that of the twins and Madeleine. He approached the ear of the two closed louvers and he heard no sound. It was also checked if there was noise in the apartment of Russell OBrien and Jane Tanner.He also said he had heard no noise.
After placing orders, around 9:15 pm, Gerry McCann went to check, only, his apartment. He lingered for about 10 minutes because he said he had talked to tennis. Today they had a tournament that they both had to play. During Gerry's absence, the waiters started bringing the dishes. Jane also went to check her apartment.Gerry came back a little after Jane.
Between the hors d'oeuvres and the main course, around 9:30 pm, her husband Matthew Oldfield and Russell OBrien both went to check on the children. Kate offered to go see the kids too, but they told her that it was not worth it, that they would check. Kate stayed at the restaurant. Four to five minutes later the declarant's husband returned after checking his apartment. He also checked the one where Madeleine was. He entered through the glass door (the couple Gerry and Kate McCann left during dinner this door accessible to all). The glazed door gives access to the living room of the apartment where there are two doors giving access to the respective rooms. Her husband entered the main room and he waited to hear if there was any noise coming from the room where the children were sleeping. He lit no light, he had a view of the twins who were lying.The door of the room was open. Only later did he realize that it was strange. In the meantime he gave no importance to this fact. The reporter's husband went back to the restaurant and said that everything was fine, that he had heard no noise. He also said that Russell OBrien had stayed with his daughter, Emie who was crying. The reporter's husband went back to the restaurant and said that everything was fine, that he had heard no noise. He also said that Russell OBrien had stayed with his daughter, Emie who was crying. The reporter's husband went back to the restaurant and said that everything was fine, that he had heard no noise.He also said that Russell OBrien had stayed with his daughter, Emie who was crying.
They ate the main course and Jane went to replace Russell so he could come and eat. The reporter does not know exactly when Russell arrived.
Around 10:00 pm, Kate McCann went alone to check her children. She came back to the restaurant crying and told us that Madeleine had disappeared. At that moment we all got up and went to see her. The surroundings were searched after checking that Madeleine was not hidden in the apartment. The twins continued to sleep, they were not moved.
The declarant has nothing more to add. After reading with the interpreter who explains to him, persists and signs.
The declarant recalls that Kate said that the window on the front side of the apartment was open, the shutters lifted. The couple never opened the shutters during their stay.
Note: The names of the children in the group are first names.
React to this article on the forum |
| |
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#4
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 4:04 PMCopy HTML
Statements by Fiona Elaine Payne.
Before publishing Fiona's statements, it seemed interesting to open a parenthesis. Following many questions received by e-mail, we will try to answer some of them. First of all, keep in mind that I was not there at the auditions. That nothing in the minutes specifies how certain questions were formulated, nor what were these questions. Except from time to time where it is said: Following our question the declarant said .... However, a classical hearing, like these - do not forget that in the state it is hearings in the context of a missing child - is often practiced on the same canvas. The inspectors have had to ask a variety of so-called open questions to the declarant. These questions have probably been the following ones. (This is a speculation here, but,
- Since when and how are you coming to Portugal?
- Since when do you know the parents of the minor?
- How was the stay?
- How was the day of May 3rd?
- How was the evening of May 3rd?
- What was the attitude of the parents with their children and especially with the missing?
- Have you noticed anything danormal?
- How is Madeleine (Character Traits)?
- Was she sick? Was she taking medication?
It is logical to imagine that this is the canvas of questions on which the PJ relies for these auditions. The technique of open questions is the only valid one in an audition. An example worth more than a thousand words, here is an example of a closed question: Was the suspect's car green? This is a closed question, not admitted to a hearing, because it influences the witness in his answer. On the other hand, the following open question: What color was the suspect's car? is fully accepted since the witness is not influenced.
Let's resume the hearing of Fiona, it was recorded on May 4, 2007 at 19:20 by an inspector of the 4th brigade of the DIC.
In this regard we take note that it says:
The declarant is auditioned as a witness belonging to the group who came to Portugal with the minor Madeleine. She (note: Fiona) is married to David who is also on the trip. She has known the minor's parents for about seven years. She met Kate when they worked together and she was already a friend when she met her future husband, David. The McCann couple has three children, a couple of two-year-old twins and Madeleine almost four years old. The declarant has two children aged 1 and 2 respectively. The idea of coming to Portugal came from her husband, David, who had been to Portugal eleven years ago.
They arrived in Portugal on April 28 last green at 12:00, coming from Leicestershire then to Faro and finally to Praia Da Luz. From Faro to the Ocean Club, they traveled in a minibus from the airport. After the CHEK IN, they were housed in the G5H apartment with all his family (husband, mother and two children).
The routines
As regards habits, the declarant said that in the morning, after breakfast, which they took with the family at the club bar around 08:15 / 08:30, they put their children in one of the nurseries of the complex, in different sections. In the afternoon, their children took a nap, during which time and her husband stayed at the apartment. Around 3:30 pm / 4:00 pm nap ended and they all went together to the pool or tennis where the declarant stayed with her children and her husband until 6:00 pm / 7:00 pm. Then they went back to the apartment, cleaned the children, put them to bed and went to join the rest of the group, for dinner between adults, Tapas restaurant located near the club.
Dinner
During dinner the declarant and her husband never went to their apartment to check the children were fine because they would have heard any noise, or the least crying in the room through a baby monitoring intercom. Yesterday, habits have been slightly modified. Indeed, yesterday she went to the beach with her children, her husband and her mother, Dianne. They arrived there around 15:45 and his income around 18:15 to go to the tennis where they stayed until 19:00. Then the declarant went to her apartment with her children and her mother. In the apartment, her mother, helped by her husband, bathed the children while the declarant was jogging on the beach until 8 pm. Then she returned to the apartment and did some housework and, She came out at 8.45 pm accompanied by her mother and her husband to go to the restaurant Tapas join the rest of the group. Among the group members at dinner was the McCann couple.
The declarant states that Kate and Gerry were repeatedly and regularly, as well as other couples, to the club to check whether the children were well. During one of these checks, Kate came back frightened and very nervous, even panicked, and she announced that madeleine was gone.
Immediately research groups were organized, either in the apartment thinking what could be hidden there, or outside, which was unsuccessful, even with the help of employees. Then, considering Kate's state of anxiety, the declarant decided to stay with her by giving her help.
The declarant was never in the apartment of Madeleine's family.
Well acquainted with Madeleine, the declarant describes her as very intelligent, and quite incapable of leaving with a stranger without shouting or protesting loudly unless she is very tired or asleep.
As for Jane's words, she only said that she saw someone with a child in her arms, but she did not know if it was Madeleine.
During the holidays, the declarant did not notice anything unusual. It has no other elements to provide.
After reading, together with the interpreter who explains the content, persists and sign laces.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Statements by David Payne | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  August 28, 2008
Statements by David Anthony Payne.
The statements of David Payne were collected the day after the disappearance of Madeleine, May 4, 2007 at 14:45. As with the other auditions, David Payne was accompanied by a sworn interpreter, A. Francisco M. The statement was recorded by Inspector Patricia D.
The beginning sentences of an audition are invariably the same. These are mandatory standard sentences.They form the legal basis of the document. Very often, they are of the type:
Us, Patricia D., Inspector of police, of service to the Judicial Police, Section Portimao, actons:
In the matter we act that it is said:
That it is spontaneously that the declarant makes this declaration. Quil is on vacation in Portugal since April 28, 2007, being housed at OCEAN CLUB, Praia Da Luz. Quil plans to return to England on May 5, 2007 (Saturday).
Quil knows Madeleine's parents for 5 years. He spent his holidays together with Madeleine and his parents. He came in a group. That the group consists of nine adults and eight children. The adults are: Diane, the declarer and his wife (children: Sandy and Lea), Russell and Jane (children: Emma and Emie), Matthew and Rachael (child: Gaelle), Gerry and Kate (children: Amelie, Sean and Madeleine ).
They came to Portugal via a Tour Operator. That it is the declarant who booked the trip.
With regard to the days spent in Portugal, the declarant describes them as very similar. He informs that his family, consisting of his mother-in-law Diane, his wife Fiona and the two children, have spent their day more independently than the other members of the group. They have most often been with the couple Russell and Jane.
Regarding the rest of the group members, normally they would get up and go for breakfast at the Millennium restaurant, after they dropped off their kids at the Kids Club and the adults would go to the resort or go to the beach. . The couple Gerry and Kate had breakfast in the apartment. It was customary, every night, to have dinner together. With the exception of Saturday, they all had dinner at Millenium Restaurant, and every evening the group was at around 8:45 pm at Tapas restaurant for supper. While the adults were dining, the children were sleeping in their respective apartments.
Following our question, the declarant said that during all the dinners, he never went to his apartment or to one of the apartments of the group, since he has an intercom whose range goes from the apartment to the restaurant. The rest of the group members, randomly, went every 20 minutes to their apartments to check if their respective children were sleeping.
As for the night of yesterday, he said that he, his wife and his mother-in-law arrived at the restaurant around 20:55. According to his recollection, when they arrived, all the members of the group were present except for the children who were in bed. During the evening, Gerry, Jane and Matthew went, alternately, to the children's rooms to check if they were sleeping. He thinks they have physically entered the apartments. He can not remember the order in which they went to see the children.
At around 10:00 pm, Kate went to her apartment, and less than 5 minutes later, she came back to the restaurant, collapsed, indicating that Madeleine had disappeared. Then everyone went to the apartment occupied by Madeleine's family. He remembers the comments that the window and shutters were open, so they remained closed throughout the week.
That the apartment occupied by the Madeleine family consists of two bedrooms, a kitchenette, a living room and a toilet. That the living room has a door that gives access to the outside towards the restaurant. He can not remember the details of the apartment but he remembers that the room occupied by the children has a window that gives in the main arena. He never entered the room but could see that there were two beds and two cots. The cradles were placed in the middle of the room. One of the beds was placed against the window, and the other, the one occupied by Madeleine, was against the wall opposite the one with a window.
To our question, the declarant does not know how many times Madeleine has left the tourist complex, but he knows what went, at least once, to the beach. That, during the holidays, he saw nothing danormal about the couple Gerry and Kate, nor with their children and in particular with Madeleine. As part of the group, he noticed nothing danormal. That during the whole stay, and mainly during the day and the night of yesterday, nothing unusual occurred in the tourist complex, which attracted his attention or could be correlated with the disappearance of Madeleine.
He describes Madeleine as a communicative, joyful, obedient girl who behaves very well. Madeleine's parents are very sociable people, known by many people, kind and affectionate. Madeleine is the daughter of both elements of the couple. She was very desired and is the result of In Vitro insemination. There was no difference in treatment between Madeleine and the twins. He does not know if Madeleine is suffering from any disease, or if she is taking medication. He has nothing more to say that could advance the investigation.
React to this article on the forum |
| Hearing Kate McCann | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  August 26, 2008
Hearing Kate Marie Healy
The hearing of Kate takes place the day after the disappearance of Madeleine, the 04/05/08 at 14h20.
In the matter of act, it is said:
The declarant is heard as a victim, being the mother of the minor. Being of British nationality, she does not master the Portuguese language in her verbal and written form. This is how the hearing is done in the presence of an interpreter: Natalia CF of A.
The declarant reports that she has been married to Gerald since December 1998. She has never been to Portugal before. This trip came following the suggestion of friends, who convinced them, at the end of last year to spend their holidays in Portugal. The trip was organized by David Payne, who made an online booking at OCEAN CLLUB in Praia Da Luz for the declarant, her husband and the rest of the group, for a total of 9 adults and eight children including her daughter Madeleine. She knows some members of the group since the year 2000 and others since a year. She was a colleague of David's wife.
They traveled in two separate groups. One of the groups was the declarant, her husband Gerald, their three children, David and his wife, the mother-in-law and their two children. One of the groups left from Leicestershire and the other from London.
The meeting point was the OCEAN CLUB where the group of the declarant arrived Saturday, April 28 around 15:00 from Faro Airport via a small bus services airport. The other group arrived the same day, at the end of the morning.
After CHEKIN, the declarant and her family were housed in the G5A apartment. The family consists of the declarant, her husband Gerald, her daughter Madeleine and a couple of twins, Sean and Amelie, two years old. The apartment is furnished with two beds in one room, plus two others in another where are also two beds of baby lent by the OCEAN CLUB.
The declarant and her husband sleep in one room and in the other the three children. The twins sleeping in the cribs, Madeleine in a normal bed, the other bed remaining empty.
Between the day of arrival, the 28th of April, and the time when Madeleine's disappearance was detected, the declarant said she did not notice anything unusual. She is just reporting an episode, where, Thursday, May 3 morning, Madeleine asked the reporter why she had not come to see the room while the twins were crying.The declarant claims to have heard nothing and therefore did not move to the room. She ignored her daughter's words because it was the first time she talked about it.
Habits
The day after their arrival, they went to have breakfast, around 07:30 / 08:30 at the OCEAN CLUB bar located a few meters away from the apartment. The following days, because the bar is far away, they started to buy provisions in a BAPTISTE supermarket located in the same artery as the apartment and they took the first meal of the day in the apartment.
After breakfast, around 09h00 / 09h30, the children went to the nursery of the club called KIDS CLUB where they practiced various activities like painting, collage etc. They stayed there until around 12:30 pm, always supervised by several employees of the OCEAN CLUB in a proportion of three children for one employee.Within the Kids Club, because of the age difference, the twins stayed in one group and Madeleine in another, with separate activities.
At 12:30, they (note: parents McCann) gathered their children and had lunch in their apartment since they had provisions. After lunch, around 1:30 pm, the children stayed by the club pool, watched by the parents, for about 45 minutes, where they played and put on protective cream. Once this time had elapsed, they placed the children at the Kids Club until about 5:00 pm / 5:30 pm. Time when children were dining in a bar under the watchful eyes of parents. After dinner at 17:00, they bathed them, prepared them for the night and let them play for a few moments in a playground next to the tennis courts, again and again under the supervision of the parents. Around 8 pm the children were in bed until the next morning where the same routines as described above were repeated. While the children were at the Kids Club, the declarant was playing tennis with her husband, walking around, reading or jogging.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Thursday, May 03, 2007.
Hier, après avoir effectué la routine quotidienne, Madeleine et les jumeaux sont allés au lit vers 19h30. Ils étaient dans leur lit respectif. La déclarante et son mari sont restés jusquà 20h30 dans leur appartement à se détendre. Elle a pris un bain, sest maquillée et a bu, avec son mari, un verre de vin Néo-zélandais. Passé 20h30, la déclarante et son mari, après avoir vérifié leurs enfants, ils ont rejoins les autres adultes du groupe au restaurant TAPAS à environ 50 mètres où ils ont dîné. Comme dhabitude, chaque demi-heure et vu que létablissement est tout près, la déclarante et son mari allaient vérifier si les enfants se portaient bien. Ainsi, vers 21h00 son mari sest rendu à lappartement vérifier si les jumeaux allaient bien ainsi que Madeleine puis il est revenu au restaurant. Son mari a dit que les enfants se portaient bien et quil avait croisé la personne avec qui il avait joué au tennis, personne qui a deux enfants. Au même moment, un des amis du groupe, Russell est allé voir ses enfants sans toutefois vérifier les enfants de la déclarante.
Vers 21h30 cétait lheure où la déclarante devait aller voir ses enfants, mais son ami Matt (membre du groupe) venait de faire une vérification dans son appartement puis sétait rendu à celui de la déclarante. Ce dernier est entré dans lappartement par une porte vitrée sur le côté latéral et une fois à lintérieur nest pas arrivé à se rendre dans la chambre des enfants, il a seulement regardé par la porte, il na entendu aucun bruit. Il est retourné au restaurant et a dit que tout allait bien.
Vers 22h00 la déclarante est allé vérifier ses enfants. Elle est entrée dans lappartement par la porte latérale qui était fermée. Elle a constaté que la porte de la chambre de ses enfants était complètement ouverte, la fenêtre était ouverte aussi, les persiennes levées et les tentures ouvertes. Alors quelle a la certitude davoir tout fermé comme elle le fait toujours.
Face à cette situation, elle a vérifié que les jumeaux se trouvaient bien dans leurs lits respectifs contrairement à Madeleine qui avait disparu, la couverture était tirée en arrière et les jouets au-dessus du coussin comme dhabitude. Après avoir cherché minutieusement dans tout lappartement, la déclarante sest rendue effrayée et choquée au restaurant, alerter son mari pour la disparition. Tout le groupe sest alors mi à la recherche de Madeleine dans tous le complexe, chercher dans toutes les installations, piscine, tennis etc... Ainsi que dans lappartement avec laide des employés qui ont en même temps, contacté les autorités.
Plus tard, un membre du groupe, Jane compagne de Russel, vers 21h15 lorsquelle est allé à son appartement, a vu à environ 50 mètres, dans lartère qui confine au club, une personne aux cheveux longs avec un enfant dans ses bras à la démarche très rapide. Mais elle pourra vous en parler mieux elle même.
Concernant Madeleine elle est de race caucasienne, de peau blanche, âgé de 4 ans (12/05/2003), denviron 90 cm de haut. Assez maigre, cheveux blonds foncés; lisses tombant sur les épaules. Oeil gauche bleu vert ainsi que le droit avec une marque marron dans loeil. Elle a un petit signe marron sur la peau de sa jambe gauche ainsi quun coup de soleil sur lavant-bras droit. Elle na pas de cicatrices. Lors de sa disparition, elle portait un pyjama avec un pantalon blanc à motifs floraux. La partie supérieure, de manche courte, majoritairement rose avec un dessin de couleur bleue et cendre portant linscription EEYORE. Inscription quon trouve également sur une des jambes du pantalon. Le pyjama est de marque Mark et Spencer.
Concernant la personnalité de lenfant, elle était extravertie, très active, parlante, maligne avec une grande facilité de relations avec les autres enfants. Mais elle naccompagnerait jamais un inconnu. Elle na aucun suspect à indiquer, ne trouve aucune raison à cette acte, elle na pas dennemi ni son mari. Elle déclare que sa fille ne souffre daucune maladie et ne prend aucune médication.
Suite à la demande de linspecteur, elle autorise que soit effectué une lecture des données se trouvant dans son téléphone portable. En dehors du Kids Club et de lappartement, ils ne sont allés quune fois à la plage avec Madeleine et les autres enfants et pendant une très courte période de temps. Depuis les conditions atmosphériques étaient instables. Ils nont pu aller à la plage quentre 13h30 et 15h00. Heure à laquelle ils sont retournés au club. A la plage ils ont seulement mangé une glace puis ils sont retournés à lappartement. En dehors de ça, Madeleine est allé à la plage avec le Kids Club, durant une heure. La surveillance et lorganisation était à charge du club. La déclarante et son mari nétaient pas présents. Elle na jamais observée de comportement étrange durant ces derniers jours qui pourrait expliquer la disparition. Après lui avoir montré la liste des hôtes de lOCEAN CLUB, elle dit ne connaître que les noms de ceux du groupe. Outre lenfant, rien dautre na disparu, pas de vêtements, ni de parures de lenfant. La déclarante navait pas dinterphone contrairement à David et Fiona qui pouvait entendre pleurer ou un bruit quelconque. Elle na pas dautres éléments à fournir dans la présente procédure criminelle. Elle na rien dautre à ajouter. Après avoir lu lacte, elle le confirme, le ratifie et signe avec linterprète.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Matthew Oldfield's audition | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  August 25, 2008
Statement by Matthew David Oldfield
Laudition starts on the 04/05/2008 at 11h30. It is done under the supervision of Inspector Patricia D. As with the previous declarations, since the declarant did not speak the Portuguese language, a sworn interpreter was asked. This is Angela FM and just like the previous statements, the hearing was re-read, its content explained. After declaring his agreement on his declarations, the declarant has ratified and signed the authentic act which follows jointly with the sworn interpreter. This is a normal procedure since the beginning of the hearings. The interpreter, by signing, commits himself to justice with regard to the authenticity of his translation.
In this regard, the declarant says: It is
of his own volition and spontaneous that he lends his statements in the context of this present act.
Quil has been on holiday in Portugal since April 28, 2007 and lives at the OCEAN CLUB in Praia Da Luz. Quil plans to return to England Saturday, May 5, 2007. He knows Madeleine's parents for about five years. That the little girl will be 4 years old next week. He spent his holidays together with Madeleine and his parents. They came in groups and this group consists of 9 adults and eight children. The adults are Diane, David and Fiona (children: Sandy and Lea), Russell and Jane (children: Emma and Emie), Rachael (daughter: Gaëlle), respectively the declarer's wife and daughter, Gerry and Kate (children: Amelie , Sean - twins - and Madeleine).
That the idea of spending the holidays in Portugal comes from the couple David and Fiona and that they are the ones who booked the hotel. That this reservation was made 4 to 5 months ago. That since they arrived in Portugal, until the night of yesterday, the days were spent in the same way. In the morning the group woke up between 06:30 and 08:00 and they all went on foot, until the Millennium about 10 minutes from the complex.That only Madeleine's parents, Madeleine and the twins had breakfast in their apartment because they have three children still too small.
After breakfast, children were left at the resort's Kids Club. Madeleine and Emma went to the kids' club for their age and the other kids went to another club for younger kids. At lunchtime, the habit was to join one of the apartments occupied by the group to have lunch with the children. During the afternoon, the children took a nap in their respective room under the supervision of an adult. The other adults were active in the sports complex. After the nap, the children returned to the Kids Club.
Around 16:45, the children were dining at TAPAS restaurant inside the resort. After dinner, the children would still play in a playground in the complex under the supervision of adults. At around 8:00 pm, the children went to sleep and at around 8:30 pm the adults were dining at the TAPAS restaurant. While they dined, the children slept in their respective apartments without adult supervision. The registrant adds that since the restaurant is about 1 minute away from the rooms, one of the adults randomly went to see the children in the rooms frequently.
That in the context of the Kids Club activities, Madeleine had gone to the beach with Kids Club employees, but he does not know how many times that happened. The rest of the activities being inside the tourist complex. The declarant states that the apartment of Madeleine's parents and their children is just before hers.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
The course of the evening.
The declarer said that yesterday was the same day as the previous day and that, like all the other nights, around 8:45 pm, he and his wife let their daughter sleep in the apartment and went to the TAPAS restaurant.There was already a couple in the restaurant, Gerry and Kate, parents of Madeleine. They would have arrived at the restaurant 5 minutes before them. About 5 minutes after the declarer and his wife arrived at the restaurant, the rest of the adults. That the last arrived at the restaurant was the couple David and Fiona.That they arrived at the restaurant at about 21:00.
At about 9:05 pm, the declarant went to the apartment area. Especially the area near the windows of the rooms of all the children. That he did not hear any noise. Quil judged that all the children were sleeping.That all the windows of the children's rooms were closed, including the windows that give access to the fourth apartment, the one occupied by Madeleine. After this check, he returned to the restaurant and said that all the children were sleeping. However, Gerry, Madeleine's dad, went to the apartment area to check, too, if the children were sleeping. That Gerry would have entered his apartment and checked if Madeleine and the twins were sleeping in their room where it was dark enough. The door of the room was between open. That 5 minutes later, Gerry returned to the restaurant with the group.
Following a question from the inspector, the registrant does not know if when Gerry checked the children, if he met someone, he did not talk about it.
That during the meal, it was usual that every 15 minutes (like every night) one of the adults goes to the rooms to check if the children were sleeping. That normally this check was done inside the rooms (Visual verification). But, to be honest, sometimes this check was done only from the outside, near the windows of the rooms (auditory audit).
As usual, dinner started at 9:30 pm.
At around 9:25 pm, the declarant went to his apartment and Madeleine's apartment to check the children. He points out that the door of the fourth apartment, the one occupied by Madeleine and the twins, was between open and there was some kind of clarity in the room so he could see the twins in their cradles. He could not see the bed occupied by Madeleine, but since everything was calm, he deduced what was sleeping. That the clarity of question came from an artificial light but not from the inside of the room but rather from the outside through the window of the room. It seemed to him that the shutters of the window of the couple's room were open without knowing if the window was too.
The apartment consists of two bedrooms, a living room, a kitchenette and a toilet. The couple's room has a window that is visible from the restaurant. The windows of the children's room give access to the road outside the tourist complex. Then the declarant returned to the restaurant.
He specifies that the room has two windows. The twins occupied two cradles placed in the middle of the room and Madeleine occupied a bed leaning against the wall in front of the wall which has the two windows which give access to the outside of the complex. That the door through which he accessed the apartment was closed but not locked. He does not know if it is the custom of Madeleine's parents to leave the door closed but not locked as long as the door is visible from the restaurant.
Around 22:00, Kate, mother of Madeleine, went to his apartment to check his children. She came back completely shocked and shouting, saying that Madeleine was no longer in his room. At this moment all the adults were at the restaurant. Then the whole group went to Madeleine's room and checked that the twins were sleeping properly. There was no sign of burglary in the apartment. Only one window of the children's room was open. The window and shutters were open.
That during the holidays, and especially during the day of yesterday and during dinner, nothing appeared abnormal to the declarant. There was not a single change in the behavior of the elements of the group, especially that of Kate or Gerry and their respective children.
Question: And outside the group?
No, there was nothing danormal and he does not know kidney past special. That the tourist complex is calm and that nothing nanormal has occurred there. That during the day the children were under the supervision of the employees of the Kids Club. He does not know if Madeleine is suffering from any disease or is taking medication. That Madeleine is very energetic, obedient, communicative and extroverted. Madeleine's parents are both very sociable, communicative, happy and cautious. That the couple have an excellent relationship with their children who do not make any difference in treatment between them. That the three children were very desired by the couple, being all three the fruit of an In Vitro fertilization.
The declarant thinks it is a kidnapping with the intention to ask a ransom to the parents. Insofar as they are very financially fit people.
Note: The names of the children in the group are first names.
React to this article on the forum |
| Jane Tanner's audition | 
'); popup.document.close (); ">  August 22, 2008
Important corrigendum.
Before we start with Jane Tanner's statements, there is a small rectification we want to make. In recent days, the press has launched an information that Jane Tanner would not have missed the Tapas all night, from 19:30 to 22:00. It seems that the press was a little fast in conclusion. The reality is that nothing says that Jane Tanner has or has not left Tapas. According to various witnesses present at Tapas, some say I do not remember seeing (Jane Tanner) left the restaurant. Which does not mean that it stayed all night. The witnesses do not remember, that's all. The only thing these statements say, is uncertainty. On this basis, the press went quickly to conclusion.
Hearing of Jane Michelle Tanner.
Just like Gerry McCann's essay, a translator is needed. This time the sworn interpreter is named: Filipa Maria.It is important to realize that each time it is different translators. This guarantees the objectivity of the translation. The translator is not influenced by the translation of the previous person. Laudition begins at 11:30 am on May 4, 2007.
Since last Saturday, April 28, 2007, I am in Portugal, at the OCEAN CLUB tourist complex in Praia da Luz with my partner (Russell OBrien), my two children and three damned couples (Gerald McCann , Kate Healy, Matthew Oldfield, Rachael Manpilly, David and Fiona Payne as well as Fiona Payne's mother, Diane Webster).We are with our children, Emma OBrien, three years old and Emie OBrien, one year old.
The other damned couples also came with their children, Gaelle Oldfield, one year old (daughter of Matthew Oldfield and Rachael Manpilly), two-year-old Léa Payne and eleven-month-old Sindy Payne (children of David and Fiona Payne). Two-year-old twins Sean and two-year-old Amélie McCann and Madeleine Beth McCann celebrating her birthday during the holiday week (The Children of Gerald McCann and Kate Healy).
The declarant and her companion are on vacation, together with the other couples, after organizing the trip from England where they are friends. They traveled via Mark Warner agency. All couples have individual apartments in the same complex, with their respective children.
Since Saturday, the habit was to get up around 07:30 / 08:00. Then to have breakfast in a restaurant near the apartment, named Millenium (6), drive the children around 9:00, until Kids Club (2) (4) (5), depending on the ages of the children. Only Gerry and Kate had breakfast in their apartment because they have three children and it's hard to walk with all three at the same time. Then they also drove their children to the Kids Club.
Kids Club
Emma OBrien and Madeleine Beth McCann remained in a room at the reception (4), the leaders is an English lady named Cat Baken. Apart from that, there were three or four people taking care of the children. (She can not remember their name except dune: Emma Wilding). They did several activities like going to the indoor pool in the resort, going to the outdoor tennis court near the tapas restaurant (3), going to the beach (outside), painting and walking around the resort.
Sindy Payne was in a different locale of Ella and Madeleine. The declarant does not know the person in charge or the employees who occupy this room. She does not know the activities either, but she thinks that they stayed mostly in the room.
Gaelle Oldfield, Emie OBrien, Lea Payne, Amelie and Sean McCann stayed in a third room (2) near the TAPAS restaurant. The manager for Gaelle and Emie was an English citizen named Leanne Wagstaff. As for Leah, Amelie and Sean, the head would be, without certainty, Stacey Portz. The activities were identical to the other rooms, outside and inside the complex.
Around 12:30, they went to pick up their children in the respective rooms of the Kids Club. The latter closed for lunch. Lunch was sometimes taken together in the apartment of one of the couples.
Around 2:30 pm the rooms of the Kids Club opened and only Madeleine, Amelie, Sean and Emma returned.The others stayed with their respective parents.
Around 16:45 all the children met to have tea in an annex of the Tapas restaurant. In the meantime, parents were going about their business.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
May 03, 2007
Until yesterday, May 03, 2007, the declarant has not, to her knowledge, noticed anything suspicious or suspicious regarding the group of friends or children. Yesterday, the declarant was not at breakfast because she had a tennis scheduled at 09:00. This is his companion who after breakfast with their two children, went to pick up Emma OBrien and he led them all to the Kids Club. Emie must have been in pain because she did not go to the Kids Club that day. Kate Healy and Diane Webster arrived and waited 30 minutes for the Tennis lesson to be over at 9:30. She does not know where the McCann kids have had breakfast but they were at the Kids Club where she assumes that dad, Gerry, will have dropped them off. During the tennis lesson (8), Kate Healy behaved in the usual way. After the lesson, the declarant went with her boyfriend, OBrien and their daughter Emie to the beach (7). They stayed there until 12:20. Afterwards they went to get Emma at the Kids Club. The declarant ignores what Kate did after leaving the tennis court (8) around 10:00 am but she knows that Gerald McCann had a tennis lesson (8) between 10:10 and 11:10. The reporter did not notice if Madeleine was still at the Kids Club when they were looking for Emma. They went to lunch in their apartment with their two children and in the company of Matthew Oldfield, Rachael Manpilly and their daughter Gaelle. They had lunch from 12:45 to 13:45 then, around 14:00, the declarant again played tennis (8) but with Rachael Manpilly this time. The declarant remembers having seen, while playing tennis (8), Kate Healy and Gerald McCann with their three children in the playground next to the court. Kate waved her hand. The McCann family stayed in this plain until 2:40 pm where they took the children to the Kids Club.
After finishing playing tennis (8), around 14:45, the declarant returned to her apartment (1) where she stayed with her daughter Emie. Her husband and Matthew Oldfield went boating.
Tennis
At 3:45 pm, the reporter went with her daughter, Emie, Rachael Manpilly, Diane Webster, Fiona Payne, Lea Payne and Sindy Payne to Praia Beach (7). Her husband Russell OBrien returned from his boat trip and went to pick Emma at the Kids Club. They joined the group at the beach (7) until they returned around 6:10 pm / 6:15 pm. Going to the beach, the group of friends mentioned above, saw Gerald McCann and Kate Healy have a particular lesson of tennis. The children were not with them. Around 5:15 pm, they saw Kate Healy by the beach (7) while jogging.
Russel OBrien, Matthew Oldfield and David Payne left the beach (7) earlier to play tennis (8) for men's night tennis. When the group returned from the beach (7) around 6:20 pm, they went through the tennis and they saw that all the men including Gerald McCann, were on the court (8). They stayed with them for about 20 to 30 minutes. Gerald McCann behaved in the usual way. The declarant assumes that Kate was in the apartment (1) putting the children to bed. Around 19:00 each returned to his apartment (1) with the children. The declarant gave a bath to her daughters, read them a story to put them to sleep. As Emie was sick and had trouble falling asleep, she stayed with her father, who had meanwhile returned home.
Tapas Restaurant
When she arrived at the restaurant there were already some of the adults in the group without children.These were, in principle, sleeping.
Around 9:00 pm, her husband arrived at the restaurant. He had managed to put Emie to sleep. Due to the delay of David Payne, Fiona Payne, and Diane Webster, the meal booked for 8:30 pm only began at 9:00 pm, the arrival time of the Payne family. Normally every 15 minutes a person from each apartment went to the respective rooms (1) of the children to see if everything was going well. During dinner everything went well.Everyone was well disposed. The reporter recalls that around 9:10 pm, Gerald McCann left the restaurant (3) to go to the apartment to see the children. Five minutes later, the declarant went out, to go to her own apartment to check her children. She saw Gerald McCann speak to a British citizen named Jez. They knew each other during the holidays and played tennis together. She passed by them knowing that Gerald McCann had already been checking the children in the apartment (1).
The suspect man
However, she spotted a man (*) who passed with a child under his arms (* *) in a hurried step with a child in pajamas without cover which attracted his attention. The declarant could see the man only sideways with the child in his arms. She saw this person exactly as she passed Gerald and Jez. This person came out of the promenade which delimits the block of apartment (1) where they live. The man quickly crossed the crossing.The entrance to the building where the apartments are located is the exact place where she saw the man.After verifying her children, the declarant returned to the tapas. When he returned, Gerald McCann was no longer in the street where she had seen talking. When he arrived at the restaurant (3) Gerald McCann was with his wife Kate Healy.
15-20 minutes later, Matthew Oldfield and her husband Russell OBrien went out to see the kids. As their daughter Emie was not well and howling, Russell stayed in the room. Matthew checked the children including Gerald and Kate's. According to him, he saw the twins but he did not manage to see Madeleine. But since he did not hear any noise, he thought everything was fine and went back to the restaurant. Matthew informed the reporter that Russell had remained in the room (1). After quickly eating the main course, the declarant worried, went to replace her husband in the apartment (1) so that the latter can eat in turn.
When she was in the room, around 22:00 / 22:15, she heard Kate Healy and Fiona Payne shout that Madeleine had disappeared. She does not know if it was Kate who discovered the disappearance because she was not at the restaurant (3) at that time. Every evening was like that, it was normal. In turn, they left the table and went to check on the children. Madeleine Beth McCann was a wise, very loving, very active and fun child. She liked to play. She was intelligent and the declarant did not believe that if a stranger approached that she would not shout. During their conversation, she does not remember that Kate reported that Madeleine slept badly or caused any problem.
|
| Description of the tourist complex:
The OCEAN CLUB tourist complex consists of a large area, the plan of which is attached hereto. In this plan are marked by numbering the most important places of research, such as:
1 - The apartments where all couples are housed. This block consists of 3 or 4 floors with on each floor about 6 apartments for a total of between 20 and 30 apartments.
2 - Kids Club room attended by Gaelle, Emie, Léa, Amélie and Sean.
3 - Restaurant TAPAS
4 - Kids Club room attended by Emma and Madeleine.
5 - Kids Club room attended by Sindy.
6 - Millennium Restaurant
7 - Praia Beach
8 - Tennis Courts
Personal description of Jane Tanner:
(*) Brunette male between 35 and 40 years old, skinny, around 1.70 meters. Very dark hair, thick, well maintained but long to the neck. (Noticed when seen the person's back). He was wearing beige-and-gold fabric trousers (linen type) with a Duffy type coat (but not as thick). He wore black shoes, classic type and had a rushed gait. He was carrying a child lying on both arms in front of his chest. By his appearance, the man gave him the impression of not being a tourist.
(* *) As for the child, who seemed to be asleep, she only saw the legs. The child seemed taller than a baby. He was without shoes, dressed in light-colored cotton pajamas (maybe pink or white). She is not certain, but the declarant has the sensation of having seen a drawing on the pajamas like flowers but is not certain.
With respect to these details, the declarant claims that she did not know what Madeleine was wearing when she disappeared, she did not discuss this subject with anyone. As for the man, she just touched a word to Gerald but without going into details and with the police. The declarant has been invited to draw up a sketch which we attach to the present deed. When questioned, she says she can probably identify the person who has seen her if she sees him in profile and where she sees her.
After reading, persists and signs.
Editor's note: The first names of the children of the damis group are first names.
React to this article on the forum
| 
'); popup.document.close (); "> |
| Gerry's audition | August 20, 2008
Hearing of Gerald Patrick McCann.
Laudition takes place the day after the disappearance of Madeleine, the 04/05/2007 at 11h15. Laudition begins with the explanation that Gerry is British and therefore does not understand Portuguese spoken or written. By virtue of which a sworn interpreter named Natalia is called upon. Its role is to translate scrupulously, from the declarant's language into the official language of the country, the words, feelings, images, verbal and familiar phrases used. And this in order to avoid any misinterpretation ...
| | Read more... |
| What are we hiding? |  August 18, 2008
What are we hiding?
11,000 pages of the Maddie Affair dossier were given to the press. Since then, a certain British press has been inventing tracks that have already been followed and trying to get the Portuguese PJ, in the eyes of the public, for incompetents who have not followed all tracks. Is it just the search for the sensational or are we trying to prepare ourselves for something else? Something more pernicious? To fully understand our remarks it is necessary to know that the three arguidos have until September 20 to ask the police to continue the investigation. It is needless to say that no parent who has been the victim of a kidnapping of a child would think of asking the police to stop their investigations! I think we can say without fear of being mistaken that:
- Martin Provencher - whose daughter, Cédrika, was abducted on July 31, 2007
- Piera whose daughter Denise was abducted on September 1, 2004
- Ithaisa whose son, Yeremi, was abducted on March 10, 2007
would be completely collapsed if they were to learn that the police are no longer investigating. However, it seems that in the case of McCann parents, things are different. The parents have already stated that they thought that the Portuguese police had done everything they could. Already suggesting that they would not ask the police to continue researching what happened !! This shocking decision, if it is right - and everything leads to believe it - can not be presented to the public under pain of shocking him or on pain of the parents permanently losing all credibility. Also, we are witnessing a hype of the so-called tracks not studied by the Portuguese PJ! Clarence Mitchell alternately lamenting or indignant at each false news story mentioned by the press. By sending in the footsteps of all these false suspects their famous super detectives who waste their time on tracks which we know very well that lead nowhere. The purpose of the manipulation is to make the public believe that their investigators are more efficient and reliable than the Portuguese PJ and that is why the parents are not going to ask the PJ to continue their investigation but to their shock detectives who are, of course, super pros far more efficient than the police. It was said that the new detectives hired by the parents would have allowed the Belgian police to watch the videos of a girl like Maddie. This is absolutely wrong! The McCann bloodhounds have learned the case via the press! Nothing more! They have absolutely nothing to do with this case. All other statements are false! I will even reveal a secret that nobody knew: The day the SUN disclosed the videos on his site, the Belgian police had already been informed that the girl had been located and that it was not Madeleine! Either the detectives have lied to their employers, who must be very naive. And in this case, they must be fired. It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! The day the SUN disclosed the videos on its website, the Belgian police had already been informed that the girl had been located and that it was not Madeleine! Either the detectives have lied to their employers, who must be very naive. And in this case, they must be fired. It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! The day the SUN disclosed the videos on its website, the Belgian police had already been informed that the girl had been located and that it was not Madeleine! Either the detectives have lied to their employers, who must be very naive. And in this case, they must be fired. It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! the Belgian police had already been informed that the girl had been located and that it was not Madeleine! Either the detectives have lied to their employers, who must be very naive. And in this case, they must be fired. It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search.Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! the Belgian police had already been informed that the girl had been located and that it was not Madeleine! Either the detectives have lied to their employers, who must be very naive. And in this case, they must be fired. It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!! It is not normal that we continue to spend money on detectives who lie instead of investing in Madeleine's search. Or, then, these words have no other purpose than to throw powder in the eyes of the public to make him believe that the new detectives are better than the police, preparing, so the public opinion to what we fear: The parents do not have the intention to ask the PJ to continue the search !!!!
And what will happen after the 20th.
If we are right, the parents will not ask the police to continue the investigation. We look forward to the date of September 20th with the hope that we are mistaken. But if we have seen right ... poor Madeleine! After September 20, the file can be reopened by all people, you and me, who bring new elements to the file. Like pictures for example ...
But for the hour by following tracks already studied under the microscope, by publishing suspect robot portraits that have been widely identified and auditioned for a long time, spending as much energy manipulating the media, we are entitled to say that acting in this way we are not ready to find Madeleine! I recall that the goal is always to find Madeleine (alive or not) not to spend money and energy in tracks whose result is already clearly indicated in the file. Why waste all that time in worn-out tracks instead of looking for Madeleine? Because for some time we do not talk about finding Madeleine but to protect the McCann or to silence anyone who could say bad parents! How much energy was wasted doing trials,
I can tell you one thing is that all parents who have experienced the drama of a kidnap do not care what a blog or site says about the drama !!! Only finding the child counts and no matter what people think or what blocks write, right?
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
The truth ... nothing but the truth.
As we have announced, we will deliver all the details of the file. Police comments, hearings of witnesses and suspects, facts, locations, times, dates etc. So over the articles you will find that the so-called new tracks are not and all the answers are in the folder. To keep track of and avoid misunderstandings, keep in mind that the investigators first followed the abduction theory before the investigation took another direction.
Volume I- Cover page.
The first page of the PV reveals nothing special. This is a standard cover page for all police VPs. It contains the classification of the offense, in loccurrence: Abduction. It contains the date of the facts, the 03/05/2007 the file number and the brigade that intervened: the 4th brigade. Finally, in addition to the inspectors' names, there is a brief summary of the facts:
Disappearance of minor. The GNR patrol in Praia has been informed of the disappearance of a female child of English nationality. According to the elements of GNR the call took place at 22:40 and the girl disappeared from the ground floor apartment of the Ocean Club where a family with her children lived. The typology of the apartment consists of two bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room and a bathroom. The apartment is easy access for the public. The couple, during dinner moved several times to the children's room. On one of her trips, the mother realized that she was missing her daughter and gave the alarm to find her. In the face of these facts and by superior decision, the PJ's guard service was notified, and proceeded immediately to various research duties.
|
| 
'); popup.document.close (); ">
Volume I - Page 2.
This is the beginning of the actual PV. The PC will identify the parents and establish in a first draft the course of the evening. The first part of the document clearly identifies the parents by giving their full name, date of birth, passport number, telephone number and exact address. You understand that this information can not be published. Nobody needs to know the phone number of the parents. The continuation of the PV is thus:
The missing minor is identified as MADELEINE BETH MCCANN born on 12/05/2003. In addition to the missing minor, the couple has two other children, two-year-old twins. The two children were also in the room where the minor Madeleine was sleeping. In our conversation with Mr GERALD PATRICK MCCANN it was possible to establish that: The family is at the OCEAN CLUB since April 28, 2007 for a week. Since the 29/04/2007, they began to dine (he and his wife) at the restaurant of the Ocean Club while their children stayed, a few meters from the restaurant, in the bedroom. They used to dine in the said restaurant with three couples. On the date of the events, they got up at 7:30 in the morning and they had breakfast in the apartment.
At 9:00 am: They left the apartment and left their children at the crèche of the OCEAN CLUB where CLUB officials are busy children until 12:30.
After lunch, around 14:30, they again placed the children in the said nursery, where they stayed until about 17:00.
Around 17:30, the parents gave a bath to the children, they gave them food and around 19:30 the three children were put to bed in the same room of the apartment.
At 20:30 the couple went to the restaurant.
Around 9:05 pm / 9:15 pm, GERALD (the father) went to see the children in the room. He saw the door open. He found that strange. He had the sensation of being completely closed. Nevertheless, he came in and saw the three children. The shutters were closed.
At 9:20 pm, JANE, a friend, passed near the apartment from the side of the main facade and saw a person with a child in his arms descending the main track. However, she did not recognize this person, nor the child. She can just say that the man must have been between 30 and 40 years old and had dark hair and light trousers.
At 9:30 pm, a friend, MAT, went to the apartment at the back of the window of the living room. He did not come in and only saw the twins sleep. He did not notice anything wrong.
At 22:00, KATE, the mother, was confronted with the disappearance of MADELEINE BETH MCCANN. She noticed that the window was wide open as well as the shutters.
Then the PV identifies via the director of the OCEAN CLUB the employees in office. The PV also states that the police have a copy of the registers of entries and exits of the children to the crèche / nursery the 03/05/07. The PV states that:
It should be noted that during the arrival of the patrol, various people were already inside the apartment. People who may have contaminated this space. It should also be noted that elements of the GNR have carried out various searches in the vicinity of the apartment in order to locate the least missing person. However, this research was unsuccessful. It was made a photographic report. The parents gave a picture of the minor: MADELEINE BETH MCCANN
End of the first part. The photo of Madeleine given by the parents should be used to indicate the small one and allow to identify clearly. The photo used is shown below.
React to this article on the forum |
|
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#5
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 4:05 PMCopy HTML
| | The truth ... Nothing but the truth |  August 13, 2008
The truth ... Nothing but the truth.
The press, or rather some press, from one country or another, distorts, invent and misinform the public. For the sole purpose of increasing their circulation, some media invent more bizarre stories than others. And we are not just referring to the tabloid The Sun which no one, a time is unkind, believes any word. The press has been amusing itself with publishing images thousands of times aired last year, claiming that they were new tracks not studied by the PJ. All this is wrong. All these tracks are nothing new and they were verified by the PJ as it should be. A simple example among so many others, apart from all these wacky stories about Belgium, is the couple's story that would have been seen with Madeleine three days after her disappearance.Mirror, would have been made by an artist on the basis of the testimony of the witness: Anna Satm. However, this track has been verified. The results of the investigations are on page 191 of the file. The famous couple was identified, auditioned and finally put out of action. The press knows it is in the report! I can understand that it is the livelihood of this kind of newspaper to disclose false information, as long as this information is sensational. Jimagine that if they continue, all, to publish anything is that they have a public that delights. We do not have, here at the association, to judge their readers. But where we can ask questions is the reaction of parents and their spokesperson. We do not understand that they participate in this masquerade! The witness was invited to the UK to meet parents McCann and Clarence Mitchell. The portrait is distributed on the parents' site. A phone number is even given. Yet Clarence Mitchell, McCann's parents and their lawyers all have a copy of the file. As a result they all know that these people have been identified and interviewed! We have the impression of playing in a huge play. A bad theater.
Do not shoot red ball on the British press! It would be too easy and not very biased. The Portuguese press is not exempt from a sensational article. So we read in part of the press that Kate's diary would be a fake according to the investigators in charge of the file. A fake to influence the investigation. In reality, the truth is slightly different. I had already explained to you in a previous article that the diary of a suspect is of little value to the police. Knowing, precisely, that this newspaper can serve to influence the investigation or to divert the suspicions. That's why, fonts all over the world never take into account. Even if a diary is entered, it is only indicative. For the case where a detail could be discovered but in no case in evidence. The Portuguese press went a little fast in conclusion. This is not the first time of the rest.
What does that mean? That everyone is lying? Of course not. There are journalists, newspapers and the media doing their job conscientiously. It must be realized that the Portuguese MP to deliver 11,000 pages of the file to the press on the existing 30,000. Which means that there are still 19,000 pages that are still covered by the secrecy of justice! Clearly, this means that the press has no more information now than before.Everything in these 11,000 pages has already been released and published for over a year now. In these pages, there is nothing new! Nothing we have not already talked about. The size of the file is in the remaining 19,000 pages!
For our part, we decided to give you all the details of the file. Thus, over the next articles, we will give you the comments of police officers, hearings of witnesses and suspects, facts, places, times, dates etc. etc. The whole as it appears in the file. Without adding or removing any commas. Let the content go in one direction or the other, in all transparency. So that you are no longer manipulated by one or the other, so that you can form an opinion based on the REAL elements contained in the file. We will publish it to you and we will attach, each time, a photo of the copy that is in the file to corroborate our writing. We will add, where necessary, a commentary clarifying the police approach and the various aspects of the file. And to begin with, in every police report, there is a document that you all have. A document that police officers have already had to ask you on different occasions: Your Identity Card and / or your passport. So we will begin with the identity card of the missing victim: Madeleine Beth McCann.
React to this article on the forum
|
| | It's not Madeleine |
August 12, 2008
It's not Madeleine.
Unlike a certain press, we will give you a little reminder of the real facts! As they happened without all the modifications and inventions of the press.
Monday, August 04, 2008. Alain, security guard, employed by the company Sécuritas and seconded to secure the administrative headquarters of the KBC located Avenue du Port Molenbeek-Saint-Jean, one of the 19 municipalities of Brussels, is faction in front of the bank around 10:30 am. When his attention is attracted to a young woman and a blonde girl passing by in front of the bank. The girl is blonde and the woman who accompanies her seems to be of magrebine type. He looks at the strange couple formed by the woman and the girl. Only two days later will he warn his superiors. The latter immediately called on the police.
|
|
Alain told the police:
I was on duty at the entrance of the agency. I noticed this blonde girl accompanied by a Moroccan woman. I was immediately struck by the glaring difference between the girl and this woman. Then, I was stopped by the words of the girl who said in a complete sentence which I did not hear the beginning, nor the end: ... I GO BACK ... (note: not LET ME GO HOME as laffirme some bad press !!)
The girl was dressed in a white shirt. At the top she wore a white sweater. She had a dark gray skirt with plaid-style plaid patterns. Under her skirt, she wore white stockings and shoes. The girl had light blue eyes, very clear. As I was paying special attention to the girl, I did not see the woman who accompanied her. However I can tell you what had brown eyes. I did not see her hair but she was wearing a scarf on her head. She was dressed quite modernly. After what happened, I went back to the bank. I could not remember where I had already seen this girl. The next day I was on leave. As this girl was trotting in my head, I did research on the internet. That's how I came across photos of Madeleine McCann. I thought I recognized the girl. I was not sure of myself At first I told myself that it was not possible, that I had to be wrong. But as time progressed, my conviction grew stronger. Back at work, I warned my superiors. They contacted the police.
|
|
On the spot, the police proceeds to the hearing of Alain V. whose particular is detailed below. Then, the police watch the 5 videos taken by the surveillance cameras. One of the police officers on the spot, suggests asking the neighborhood inspector if he does not know anyone in the neighborhood who could look like the girl. The report is drawn up and all the elements are sent to the disappearing cell of the Belgian federal police. At this moment, the press is not yet aware of the guard's testimony. Not for a long time...
|
|
The undersides of the case.
Following the article by SOS Madeleine concerning the testimony of the guard, the British press who seeks at all costs to discredit Belgium in the eyes of their readers, passing the Belgians for people wallowing in prostitution and for pedophiles satiating our fantasies on children, seizes the case. From then on journalists from various tabloids meet in Brussels: News of the World, The Mail, The Daily Mail and the Mirror. Only SUN goes down to Ghent instead of Brussels. The SUN is, strangely, accompanied by a member of the federal police disappearing cell who guides them to the scene of the incident, in turn the KBC. The next day, SUN publishes online the 5 videos of the file that were initially sent to the disappearing cell of the federal police.According to our information, SUN paid 40. 000 for these videos. Then SUN resold them to SKY News for the tidy sum of 100,000. According to our information, the purchase of the videos would have been through a person whose son had done an internship in the UK within the SUN and whose father (which we will not disclose the identity) would be very close to the investigation. He would have, for money, leaked information and sold evidence in violation of the article of the Belgian Penal Code on the professional secrecy to which the police officer is bound! From then on the press jostled in Molenbeek. The Mirror even had 3 teams, one of which was to follow the SUN team and to go back and forth everywhere. At this point the newspapers misinform the public by disclosing false information. Thus SUN declares that: The Belgian police recognize that it could be Madeleine. Information absolutely false since then, the investigators already know that it is not Madeleine. The journalists of the Daily Mail have done an interesting job. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and put up posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number.These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. Information absolutely false since then, the investigators already know that it is not Madeleine. The journalists of the Daily Mail have done an interesting job. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and posted posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. Information absolutely false since then, the investigators already know that it is not Madeleine.The journalists of the Daily Mail have done an interesting job. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and posted posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. The journalists of the Daily Mail have done an interesting job. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and posted posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. The journalists of the Daily Mail have done an interesting job. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and put up posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN.He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and put up posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. They went to all the shops and cafes around KBC and put up posters with the photos of the woman and the girl with their phone number. These posters have borne fruit. The little girl's father became angry when he saw his daughter's pictures posted all over her neighborhood. He went back home. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police. The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter. He went on the internet, he saw the images leaked by the SUN. He immediately understood the importance of the thing and went to the police.The young pregnant woman who accompanied the girl is none other than her babysitter.
Note that the statement of the security guard is in good faith. He was not trying to attract attention. When we watch videos, we can not help but be disturbed by a certain resemblance in attitudes. In addition, the girl speaks English well. We saw the girl and the resemblance is really striking with Madeleine. We would have fallen into the panel ourselves.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Police dogs |  August 07, 2008
A Belgian pedophile network?
Lieve Pellens, spokeswoman for the Federal Prosecutor's Office, said that the Belgian federal prosecutor's office has not received any information from British or Portuguese investigators that the English girl Madeleine McCann was abducted at the instigation of a Belgian pedophile network. The information comes from the British media. Again, this track is not new. We have already talked about it. Toscano launched this rumor. This Spaniard has been considered a journalist specializing in child disappearances and he has already found several. He was heard several times by the Portuguese authorities but his allegations were quickly dismissed. Here we even said that Toscano was not credible and we maintain it. Toscano was especially trying to make people talk while he planned to publish a book. As for the children he found, he could never prove it. It was he who had launched the false track of: El frances. El Frances was found shortly afterwards. He is an amateur of little boys and not little girls, he was quickly dismissed potential suspects after careful checks.The British press brings out this old story as if it were a new track, and Clarence Mitchell is always astonished as if it were the first time we talked about it!
Moreover, if there are pedophile networks, they are not structured. Networks provide themselves in another way. First, there are network members who offer their own children. Then there are parents who rent their children for an hour or a whole weekend. In Belgium, as in France, networks provide themselves, in the UK and in other countries, in some orphanages in their country that also rent children. A Belgian journalist is preparing a fairly complete book on the subject. And finally, it is very very easy to buy a child. In some countries, which are less industrialized than us, there is a real parallel economy in the sale of children. They are sold with a guarantee of their good health. Satisfied or exchanged !! Authentic!! These kids are selling, sometimes only 40! So why take risks to abduct a child abroad, make it travel with the risks that this includes. Without counting on the infrastructure and the people it takes to organize, plan, logistically support and transfer a kidnapped child !! Kidnappings are mainly the result of an isolated predator or a very small group of two or three predators, often poorly organized.
Maddie frenzy having resumed, I'm willing to bet that we will soon have new testimonials from people who have seen Maddie in all corners of the world!
|
| 
Police dogs.
In this case, there is a lot of talk about blood-detecting dogs and cadaver detection dogs. They played a key role in the following events. To understand how this dog reacts, we interviewed an expert in the field. But before asking him a few questions, it must be understood that a dog trained by the police has nothing in common with a private training. The police have technical resources but especially the criminal experience of the field so that the training of their dogs have nothing in common with training clubs open to individuals.This notion is important because it makes it possible to distinguish the words of a private trainer having no police competence and that of a professional dog Master of the seasoned police techniques which the individual has no idea. It is necessary, also, to understand well that the lodorat of the dog is carried out and by his training the police dog exceeds his congeners in the use of the same organ. But to give you a better idea, a normal untrained dog is able to smell a drop of vinegar in a bathtub filled with water. This ability being developed by his training, you can easily imagine the lodor power of this type of dog.
Our expert, who is obliged to keep the anonymity is Chief Master dog search of human remains. A police officer, he and his dog are recognized and respected in canine police circles. Being still in office, and having not yet received a positive response from his hierarchy to participate in our interview, we are obliged to guarantee him anonymity. Which does not influence his skills.
- Can the blood odor be detected after cleaning with detergent?
The dog can perfectly detect traces of blood, diluted residues. These residues can get stuck in various interstices. Thus during a case our dogs found residues stuck in the joints between the slabs of the tiles of a room.
- How long after cleansing can dogs still smell blood?
We had positive situations several weeks after the fact. Depending on the frequency of cleaning, this time may be shorter. If the premises are cleaned daily or several times a day, the detection time can be reduced to a few days instead of a few weeks. On the other hand, if the cleaning is only once a week, the delay may be 4 weeks before the disappearance of the odor for the dogs.
- Does the dog detect only the smell of blood or the smell of a corpse?
Here, we must make a distinction. The dog has in him dodgers very specific. A little in the way of drug dogs that have olfactory images of narcotics. These images are listed in his head. He will never forget them. However, the smell of blood is a smell of blood! This means that the dog does not distinguish between human blood odor and animal blood odor. That's why, the lab is always with us when we use our dogs. On the other hand, at home, the cadaver detector dog and the blood detector dog are only one. Each of our dogs detect both smells. Unlike our friends from New Scotland Yard who owns a luxury version: 2 different dogs - 1 by smell. The training and techniques used are the same. There is no difference in competence between dogs. The advantage of having two different dogs lies in the fact that if the cadaver dog marks a spot and not the blood-detecting dog, it can be deduced that the victim died without blood loss. As is the case for a throttling for example.
- How long should the corpse stay in place so that the smell is detectable by the dogs?
There are many possibilities. If there was blood flow at the time of death, the odor will be detectable immediately. What is known as blood flow means that the victim has lost blood. Whether it is from blows or bumping into falling, it does not matter, as long as there is blood flow. It is here that having two dogs can make sense. Our blood will smell directly as it detects both. The British police will have to pass with the two dogs and only the blood detector dog will react. In summary, the dog will detect the smell of blood (following blood flow at the time of death) rather than the cadaver odor that will not be defined yet.
On the other hand, if there has been no blood flow, for example death by strangulation, it takes a certain time before the decomposition of the body. As long as this decomposition did not take place, the dog could only smell of a human being. Thus, if there was no blood - jinsist, the body will take several days to this decomposed. Under normal atmospheric conditions, in our climate, it will be necessary to wait several days before the odor is detectable by the dog. And this, even if the corpse is fleeing under several meters of concrete or camouflaged by other subterfuges which I can not speak here. Of course, the decomposition may be faster if the corpse is stored in a humid cellar, the decomposition will be faster and therefore the odor detectable faster.
- In the case of an accidental death of a child, can the odor be detected if the body has remained in the apartment for a maximum of two hours?
Once again you have to be careful. If there was no blood flow, then I am formal: NO! It's impossible ! The dog would have smelled human deodorant deposits. And if there has been blood flow, only the blood detector dog will react and not the corpse detector. The body could thus be moved for about 72 hours before the corpse odor is detectable. This delay can be reduced to 48 or 24 hours in tropical climates.
- Can the cadaver odor detected by dogs come from contamination? Clothes containing corpse odors that would contaminate the room where the dog works?
Yes it is theoretically possible. The contamination of a place by clothes already containing the smell of a corpse is plausible. Thus a person working in a morgue could, by negligence, contaminate another place by carrying the odor until then. But the dog did not fail at his job. In your example, the dog will mark the smell of corpse because this smell is well and truly! The way this scent has been brought to the scene is another thing that investigators will have to elucidate themselves, not dogs! On the other hand, if the smell of blood is also detected, then the theory of contamination is unlikely to be questioned. This remains very theoretical and I must admit that in 15 years of profession and practice of canine interventions in complex criminal cases, I never met this case. Because to be valid, the person who contaminates the place should be there with his work clothes (in the example of a mortuary employee). If this person has changed and washed, she knows nothing to contaminate on the spot.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Whatever! |  August 06, 2008
Everything and anything !
Since the process was made public and journalists had access to the file on DVD, the media are going crazy and they do not know what to invent to attract attention. In a frenzy for publication, wanting, at all costs, to publish before its neighbor, the British press as a whole sank into ridiculous high! The idea being to publish everything and anything but faster than its neighbor. As soon as they have a picture, he publishes it without thinking about the consequences for the families of the people photographed. He adds two or three excerpt from the report accompanying the photo and voila. But this is total disinformation !! Let's note first that the photos contained in the file are FORMALLY PROHIBITED AT PUBLICATION !!! On the other hand, this same press makes a whole story about a little girl seen in a gas station and who would look like Madeleine, claiming that the investigation was not made! It's wrong! If they took the trouble to be objective and want to inform people honestly, they would publish the entire document and pointing out that the track was followed and eliminated. They would post the fact that the PJ suggested to Kate to come with them to check if it was Maddie but what they answered, I quote the file, what else had to do! Which did not fail to target the investigators! This is also in the report gentlemen of the British press! Just read a few lines further! Today, with a clear desire to manipulate public opinion, the tabloids speak of the so-called non-exploited Dutch track. Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for parents, said: It is shocking and painful, reading this report, not to know if it was Madeleine or not. But that's stated in the report. The track was followed. The authorities have taken the necessary steps. And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? He said: It is shocking and painful, reading this report, not to know if it was Madeleine or not. But that's stated in the report. The track was followed. The authorities have taken the necessary steps. And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? He said: It is shocking and painful, reading this report, not to know if it was Madeleine or not. But that's stated in the report. The track was followed. The authorities have taken the necessary steps. And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth?One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? not to know if it was Madeleine or not. But that's stated in the report. The track was followed. The authorities have taken the necessary steps. And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? not to know if it was Madeleine or not. But that's stated in the report. The track was followed. The authorities have taken the necessary steps. And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion?How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? And Mr. Mitchell is in possession of the file, so what is he playing at? Let us add that Kate had declared that Madeleine did not like the Maddie call and that each time she said that it was not Maddie but Madeleine. One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers? One wonders why Mr. Mitchell is trying to manipulate public opinion? How vital is it to pretend not to know or to distort the truth? One can also ask questions about the intellectual integrity of some journalists deliberately and knowingly misinforming the readers?
In reality there is nothing new. Nothing the world press has not spoken about in recent months. All these so-called new unmonitored tracks are not. They have all been studied. The press is only passing a second layer on events perfectly known to all. Intellectual Integrity is to publish an article without hiding certain elements. The truth is to publish the information as it is even if it does not please. In this case, many elements have the micro bullet in the ear of the investigators. Quickly returning suspicious parents in the eyes of the PJ. All these elements end to end form a track. This track must lead investigators to one or more evidence or to a cul-de-sac. If we regularly expose the elements that led the PJ to suspect the parents, It is to explain to you why the parents were suspected. These elements are in no way evidence, just suspicions, strong presumptions. This is how a track is established. The MP stated that there was no evidence to help the parents in the disappearance of Madeleine. The MP is right! There is no evidence strong enough to support a charge. Only suspicions remain. That is why, in all logic, the status of the parents has been removed. The MP states that he is convinced that Madeleine has died but that there is no evidence of parental involvement.Only the facts of abandonment of child or negligence could have been retained but the MP decided to abandon these charges there. But let's not forget that the survey is not at all abandoned or closed, nor ranked contrary to what some press says. The investigation continues and will not be closed until Madeleine, alive or not, will be found. Also, although the parents are no longer arguidos, they are not so far innocent or laundered. The PJ's belief in the parents has not changed.
React to this article on the forum
|
| DNA results |  August 05, 2008
Parents less and less credible?
Since the file is accessible to the press, each media goes from its comment. All Portuguese newspapers reveal disturbing elements that cast doubt on the parents' claims. In fact, many elements remain difficult to explain. Many details, facts and testimony contradict the statements and statements of parents and their friends. Of course the details revealed in the press are not going to be in favor of the McCann family. And for good reason, the investigators have forged an opinion about them and this opinion appears over the pages. Be careful, however, not to be told what I did not say: I do not claim that the PJ to guide the investigation according to his convictions than the opposite! The survey was conducted as it should. These are the contradictions, the glaring inconsistencies, the lack of cooperation, the inappropriate reactions of the parents who naturally led the investigators (who are professionals, do not forget) to suspect the parents. You know all the troubling elements we are talking about:
- Kate, who comes back to her friends shouting: They kidnapped Madeleine but leaving her children in the apartment where an abduction has just been committed.
- Friends who go looking for her but do not go to their own apartment if she is not there or if their children are still there.
- The room perfectly tidy and Madeleine's bed undone. (Thanks to the kidnapper for redoing the bed or Madeleine was not in bed at the time of his disappearance)
- The fact that British diplomacy was notified and pressured into a police investigation (Kate acknowledged in a British newspaper a few days ago that she had telephoned the British Prime Minister to ask him to put pressure on the investigation for what advance
- The contradictory statements concerning the forced door (which was not), the obsolete and forced shutters (which was also not).
- Witnesses who do not see the same things as parents and their friends while being in the same places at the same time (299 witnesses were interviewed).
- Inconsistencies in the statements of friends of the group.
- The lack of cooperation of the group.
- The refusal to participate in a reconstitution (Yet essential to know what happened to Madeleine - Is not it the only goal?)
- The blood found in the room.
- The corpse smell detected.
- etc.
If these attitudes are proven, it is understandable that the investigators began to have serious suspicions.There are many others, and sometimes more striking than the few little examples that I list. The press will introduce you to others over the next few days. Most of the discussions and articles published will be around, on the one hand tracked dogs which I remind you briefly:
The action of specially trained British dogs to detect the smell of corpse and human blood was decisive for Gerry and Kate to be suspected. Faced with the coincidence of the action of the two dogs, who reported the same places as well as the same objects, the authorities were obliged to admit a possible implication of the parents in the disappearance of their daughter and to designate them arguidos in order to confront them with the elements which could lead them to an indictment. The inspectors explain that the dogs showed signs of corpse and human blood in the following places and objects:
In the apartment where Madeleine disappeared (In the couple's bedroom and in the living room)
In the kitchen garden
In the vehicle rented by parents 24 days after Maddie's disappearance.
On Kate's two clothes
On Maddie's teddy that Kate did not let go the days following the disappearance.
In the apartment of the McCann's friends, in the village of Praia and in the vehicles used by Robert Murat - the first accused to be suspected - nothing was detected by the dogs.
And on the other hand the articles will revolve around DNA analysis ...
The DNA results.
The media war has begun. British newspapers do not speak the same language as Portuguese newspapers. For example, Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for parents, said in the British press: DNA results have never been 100% compatible with Madeleine's DNA. A warning had been expressed from the beginning. The police were wrong to continue this line of inquiry. The Portuguese judicial system has found no evidence! I can confirm that the PJ told Gerry that Madeleine's DNA was found in both apartments and in the vehicle while it is clear now that this is not what the first HSS report says. You have to wonder what the police are trying to do by inventing evidence they do not have and can not have.
We will take a small note of Mr. Mitchell's statements. From a police point of view, sometimes police officers tell suspects to take evidence, which they actually do not, in order to crack a suspect; it must not be done in any way. Indeed, it is difficult to tell a suspect, for example, that his debts were found at the scene of the crime while the suspect knows well that he wore gloves throughout his misdemeanor and therefore the police say no matter what! You have to be a little serious. Advancing evidence that one does not have to remain plausible knowing that if the suspect is the culprit, the police will lose face if it invents evidence that the suspect knows to be wrong !!
On the other hand, Clarence Mitchell's interpretation of the DNA results is unreliable. To help us in our remarks, our association has called on an expert in the field. This is Mrs. S.Adamis, Judicial Expert at the Unit of Genetic Expertise of the Catholic University of Louvain (GNEX - UCL).
Kidnapped Children's Association: Do you know the LCN technique and is it commonly used?
S. Adamis: The LCN (Low Copy Number) is a technique developed by the laboratories of the English Forensic Science Service to analyze samples containing a very small number of DNA molecules. The basic principle is to increase the number of PCR cycles to increase sensitivity [Gill, 2000; Whitaker, 2001]. This technique has two major disadvantages:
1) it produces unbalanced profiles for one or the other marker, with possible disappearance of an allele due to the stochastic effect.
2) it leads to the detection of one or the other allele in negative controls of undetermined origin.
The first disadvantage leads to the incomplete, partially erroneous and non-reproducible profile. This lack of reliability goes against the spirit of quality advocated in particular by the ISO 17025 standards in force in our country.
The second requires obligatorily to work in particular conditions to avoid contamination inherent to ambient conditions and especially from human DNA present in the dust of the atmosphere or on the surfaces of objects. Given the limitations of this technique, the conclusions reached could easily be attacked and annulled in a judgment. This technique is not used routinely in genetic identification laboratories in Belgium.
AEK: If on a DNA analysis, 15 out of 19 markers belong to a person x, can we conclude that it is this person?
HER: If the profile is complete and quality, and markers analyzed are informative then without a doubt! The result is discriminating. This result is very very reliable. The error is 1 to 1 billion! It is almost impossible that it is otherwise. For a DNA profile, at least 7 basic markers are needed. In the case you present, 15 out of 19 markers leave no doubt. This result is quite reliable and usable in the courts. The error rate of one billion is so unlikely that the result is recognized by the magistrates without the lawyers being able to question them.
Here we open a parenthesis. We understand even better the attitude of the PC. Indeed in the face of the inconsistencies of which we speak above, the police have doubts. Then the dogs detect remnants of blood and corpse smell. Doubts turn into conviction. But something is missing. All these elements are not enough to face a charge in a court. It lacks a confirmation. A scientific confirmation. This confirmation comes with the first analysis report which specifies that 15 out of 19 DNA markers belong to Madeleine. It does not take more to the police. The proof is there. Obvious. The first analysis report proves the culpability of parents in the eyes of investigators. This report would be considered irrefutable proof by, I believe, all the policies. From then on the parents were placed, in all logic, under the particular status darguidos. Of course, an error rate of 1 to 1 billion is not a 100% profile, in that Clarence Mitchell to reason. When, then, a blow is heard. A second report from the FSS arrives and totally contradicts the first one. Ruining the evidence that the police thought. According to this report, the samples taken would have been contaminated eventually making them very unreliable. Several DNA would have been mixed to create the DNA of anyone! According to this report, the samples taken would have been contaminated eventually making them very unreliable. Several DNA would have been mixed to create the DNA of anyone! According to this report, the samples taken would have been contaminated eventually making them very unreliable. Several DNA would have been mixed to create the DNA of anyone!
EAK: If you collect DNA from three different people, can you recreate the DNA of anyone?
SA: If the harvested DNA is mixed with the DNA of 3 individuals in an equivalent way, then we could actually find the DNA profile of anyone. Mine just like yours. But the mixture must be perfectly equivalent. In which case the reliability rate becomes very very low, going from 1 to 1 billion to 1 per 1,000 or 1 per 100. It is therefore no longer a question of considering this result as discriminating.
So what happened? The LCN unreliable? Samples contaminated during the second analysis but not at the first?The first botched analysis by the FSS? There is a way to find out. When two areas of expertise contradict each other, a third analysis is done in an independent laboratory. But, unfortunately, following an unexplained incident, the only samples of existing DNA were, unfortunately, lost or destroyed by the laboratory. Which makes a third analysis impossible!
React to this article on the forum
|
| The investigation continues |  August 04, 2008
The investigation continues.
The PJ had announced the archiving of the file: The investigation is neither fenced nor abandoned. And fortunately the investigation is not over because Madeleine alive or not, has not been found. The PJ had stated that he was pursuing the investigation far from media agitation, in calm and serenity. Today, while the Maddie case file is made public and all the journalists have reserved access, it is clear that part of the case will remain under judicial secrecy. There would be several parties involved. It would be the British authorities who requested that certain documents not be disclosed to the public. Another party was at the request of the PJ for documents considered of extreme importance. It can be deduced that the PC continues its investigation and this would explain, as I have already pointed out, a certain agitation within the PJ. A third party remained under the secrecy of justice, would be following a private request. We will come back to this later.
Calculated strategy?
Having made the case public without drawing conclusions against the suspects while continuing the investigation is this a desirable strategy? One can, of course, think that yes. The PJ, making public all or almost all elements without blaming anyone, occupies everyone, the parents' lawyers, the parents themselves, the press, all the media etc. While everyone focuses on the report and then on the record, the time everyone is watching the DVD content (the folder is on DVD), the PC, meanwhile, can continue its investigation in serenity.
Interference in the investigation?
SOS Maddie reveals that at the hearing of OOBrian as a witness, he could have first read the statements of his companion, Jane Tanner before answering questions from the police officer in charge. It is, of course, scandalous! It is totally inadmissible for a police officer, who is not a beginner since he is 25 years old, to let a witness read the statements of one or more other witnesses. This is an awkwardness not to say a desire to guide the hearing. It's a professional mistake! The hearing of any witness is under professional secrecy even if it is the statement of the wife of the witness in question. OBrian, in a statement, acknowledges having read the hearing of his wife to: refresh his memory. As for Jane Tanner, she was interrogated but her hearing was interrupted by the unexpected release of the fire alarm. For the next 23 minutes, while the police station was evacuated by a specific procedure, Jane was able to interview one of the suspects and one of the suspects in person in the case. All within the police station. Even if it is not a prosecution witness, one may question the ethical aspect of the procedure. Note that, despite everything, Jane had and still has contacts with some suspects of the moment and they could discuss freely the case well before being auditioned. Jane was able to interview one of the suspects and one of the suspects in person in the case. All within the police station. Even if it is not a prosecution witness, one may question the ethical aspect of the procedure. Note that, despite everything, Jane had and still has contacts with some suspects of the moment and they could discuss freely the case well before being auditioned. Jane was able to interview one of the suspects and one of the suspects in person in the case. All within the police station. Even if it is not a prosecution witness, one may question the ethical aspect of the procedure. Note that, despite everything, Jane had and still has contacts with some suspects of the moment and they could discuss freely the case well before being auditioned.
Brian Kennedy, the billionaire who finances the parents' lawyer team and the salary of Clarence Mitchell, among others, visited several witnesses involved in the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine.One is entitled to ask why an individual, even a billionaire, can afford to interfere in a police investigation?The witnesses least favorable to McCann would have been particularly visited. The question that immediately comes to mind is: why? What purpose ? Certainly Brian Kennedy is not involved in the ongoing investigation in Portugal. He is not even a witness. The British authorities should have, at least for ethical reasons, but especially for the sake of objectivity, to question Brian Kennedy on his motives to interfere in an investigation concerning a 4-year-old girl? jusquici, the British authorities remain silent about this. However, the Portuguese authorities have asked their British counterparts for clarification but again without a reply from the UK.
The McCanns allegedly tampered with the evidence?
In today's edition, Correio da Manha states that the PC has no doubts as to whether Madeleine's parents have changed the layout of the furniture and other objects in Maddie's apartment. If that is true, and we have to see on what basis this is the CdM, this is a make-up of the scene of a crime scene in order to deflect suspicion and erase evidence. Note that the PC has always considered it odd that the bed of Madeleine was not defeated as if the girl had not slept. It is hard to believe that a kidnapper took care to remake the bed of Madeleine perfectly after being removed? Now let's hope that the DVD file (which our association will be able to consult) will explain these troubling details.
React to this article on the forum |
| Kate's diary |  August 01, 2008
Kate's diary.
In recent days, the Portuguese press has published elements of Kate's diary. These elements are part of the file. It is likely that the published part is part of the personal notes of a former PJ inspector and that the newspaper publishes. With the support of their editor, the newspaper does not hesitate to reveal many elements of the investigation and this in response to the dictatorial threats of Clarence Mitchell, McCann spokesman. We decided the association not to talk about the contents of this newspaper because as its name indicates, it is a newspaper INTIME. Moreover, its content is not proof. On the contrary. It would not be the first time that a culprit has tried to manipulate the police by pointing out things that are contrary to his guilt in his newspaper, knowing that sooner or later the police will read it. Attention, we do not say that is the case for Kate McCann. We just want to explain that this journal does not constitute in any way an element of guilt or innocence. As access to the file is not yet authorized, the hypothesis that it is the personal notes of a member of the investigation seems to us more than probable. If one can understand the leniency of having been withdrawn from an investigation by a hierarchy having bent over the political pressure of a foreign power, one is entitled to ask questions about the utility of disclosing such details. Okay, he only publishes the parts related to the case but still I feel a certain discomfort in this attitude. We just want to explain that this journal does not constitute in any way an element of guilt or innocence. As access to the file is not yet authorized, the hypothesis that it is the personal notes of a member of the investigation seems to us more than probable. If one can understand the leniency of having been withdrawn from an investigation by a hierarchy having bent over the political pressure of a foreign power, one is entitled to ask questions about the utility of disclosing such details. Okay, he only publishes the parts related to the case but still I feel a certain discomfort in this attitude. We just want to explain that this journal does not constitute in any way an element of guilt or innocence. As access to the file is not yet authorized, the hypothesis that it is the personal notes of a member of the investigation seems to us more than probable. If one can understand the leniency of having been withdrawn from an investigation by a hierarchy having bent over the political pressure of a foreign power, one is entitled to ask questions about the utility of disclosing such details. Okay, he only publishes the parts related to the case but still I feel a certain discomfort in this attitude. If one can understand the leniency of having been withdrawn from an investigation by a hierarchy having bent over the political pressure of a foreign power, one is entitled to ask questions about the utility of disclosing such details. Okay, he only publishes the parts dealing with the case but still I feel a certain discomfort in this attitude. If one can understand the leniency of having been withdrawn from an investigation by a hierarchy having bent over the political pressure of a foreign power, one is entitled to ask questions about the utility of disclosing such details. Okay, he only publishes the parts dealing with the case but still I feel a certain discomfort in this attitude.
Malinka
Sergey Malinka, 23 years old, lived in Praia da Luz and was a friend of Robert Murat and reminded us of the Portuguese press. He was involved in the turmoil of the case because he was the last to contact Robert Murat after Madeleine's disappearance. It is he, too, who made the webpage of the company that Robert Murat directs with Michaela Walczuch. Although he was only heard as a witness, the PJ suspected her of being involved in Maddie's disappearance. The interrogation was tough and we could hear from the outside. The members of the PJ were irritated that their questions remained unanswered. His phone was placed under surveillance but nothing came out. Russian was heard on May 16, two days after Robert Murat was suspected of kidnapping Madeleine. Malinka's past did not work in his favor. He allegedly had sex with minors, which makes him a potential predator. The Portuguese press, however, does not specify the age of minors. Were they girls or boys? The answer is certainly contained in the case file. A case that will soon be made public ...
Access to the file.
Laffaire will be made public this Monday announces the Portuguese press. But we can not imagine how much.Indeed, the file will be available to journalists who demanded access from Monday morning in the court of Portimao and this official source. The contents of the file will thus be revealed in open newspapers. I think Clarence Mitchell is going to have a lot of lawsuits to prepare. Will he have time to still look for Madeleine?
Part of the case remains under the secrecy of justice.
The parents sent some of their British lawyers to Portugal to join the Portuguese cabinet in charge of the parents' interests. Together they will consult an important part of the file. Nearly 20,000 pages. These pages will be copied and sent to the UK. After that, the parents will send the file to the detective agency they hired. However, parents as well as journalists will not have access to the file. The PGR has decided to keep part of the file under the cover of the secret of justice. The judge responsible for the case has received and accepted a request to keep certain information secret. Very quickly many people imagined that the PJ was behind and that the latter would be on some interesting tracks. This is, obviously, possible in view of a certain effervescence that reigns for some days within the PJ and investigators. But there is another explanation that we echoed on July 20th. Remember:
A magistrate and two police officers, including Stuart Prior, a liaison officer with the PJ, went to the District Court of Portimao to ask the Public Prosecutor's Office not to release the secret of justice on the entire Maddie case. The motives behind this move would be diverse, according to the Portuguese press. There is, on the one hand, the fact that the British police want to keep secret the contents of the list of British nationals classified as pedophiles living in the Algarve. These known pedophiles have been clearly identified on a list that the UK authorities gave to the PJ and which is part of the Maddie file. The lifting of the secrecy of justice would make the contents of the list accessible to the public. Another reason, according to the Portuguese press, would be the request not to lift the secrecy of justice on the results of the DNA tests. It would seem that the English do not wish to see the preliminary report of the Birmingham lab in which it is established that 15 of the 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later. It would seem that the English do not wish to see the preliminary report of the Birmingham lab in which it is established that 15 of the 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later. It would seem that the English do not wish to see the preliminary report of the Birmingham lab in which it is established that 15 of the 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later.
DNA results
In an upcoming article we will talk about DNA results in more detail and a geneticist expert in DNA analysis will answer some questions that our readers are asking ... (to be continued ...)
Comment on this article on the forum |
|
|
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#6
|
-
-
Rank：Diamond Member
- Score：2851
- Posts：2851
-
From：USA
- Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM
|
Re：Enfants Kidnappes Police Association Maddie
Date Posted：03/02/2018 4:09 PMCopy HTML
Mood ticket |  July 30, 2008
Madeleine was kidnapped?
In many forums, there are comments about how much time the parents have to prevent the forces of Maddie's disappearance. Admittedly, the fact that the British press was quickly warned is not normal. Just as it is not normal that the Director of the PJ be disturbed in the middle of dinner in Lisbon by the British diplomacy asking if he was aware of the disappearance while the PC was not contacted yet about it !! However, the fact that the couple's friends and Gerry, with the exception of Kate who has been talking to a friend, first looked for Maddie in the area, seems to me to be logical. It is only natural that you first look for your child in the area before getting to the police. The child may have simply gone astray. Alone,
What does the police ?
The police, once warned of the disappearance of a child of the age of Maddie, goes immediately on the spot.On the spot, the police make contact with the family and try to obtain a precise description of the girl as well as a photo. The police seek, at first, to eliminate various simple assumptions. Unless one or more elements support the thesis of any crime, it is the track of the incident that is privileged. We informally question family, friends, passers-by and so on. So we try to find out if the child could have left his room. We try to find out if other children are missing, in which case we could assume that they are together somewhere. Friends are asked if the child is not in their respective room.
The police rely on the statements of all without questioning their veracity. We are talking here about a lost child, not yet a crime. There is therefore no valid reason to question the statements made. If they are told that the rooms have been checked, the police do not pass in order to control. Every minute counts. He is always a lost child. If the first searches are unsuccessful, the police request reinforcement as a man to organize a wider search. We enter the hypothesis of the accident. At this moment and as far as no elements allow to think the opposite, one seeks a child victim of an accident. Perhaps she has fallen into a ravine, a nearby river, a cellar, by a stench disgusting etc ... The raking begins. If, at the end of the first phase of the search, no trace or index of the passage of the child can be found, one enters the so-called phase of ominous disappearance. It is at this point that the police, in search of the GNR, call for a more specialized service, in the case that concerns us, the PJ. From there, all assumptions will be studied, analyzed, compared and all possible motives will be considered. This is when we can consider a security perimeter but, alas, too late in this case. In fact, the parents' apartment has already been contaminated by a continuous coming and going.By dozens of people who came in and out of the room. Not to mention the fact that the cleaning was done in the room before the arrival of the police. in the case of the GNR, calls for a more specialized service, in the case that concerns us, the PJ. From there, all assumptions will be studied, analyzed, compared and all possible motives will be considered. This is when we can consider a security perimeter but, alas, too late in this case. In fact, the parents' apartment has already been contaminated by a continuous coming and going.By dozens of people who came in and out of the room. Not to mention the fact that the cleaning was done in the room before the arrival of the police. in the case of the GNR, calls for a more specialized service, in the case that concerns us, the PJ. From there, all assumptions will be studied, analyzed, compared and all possible motives will be considered. This is when we can consider a security perimeter but, alas, too late in this case. In fact, the parents' apartment has already been contaminated by a continuous coming and going.By dozens of people who came in and out of the room. Not to mention the fact that the cleaning was done in the room before the arrival of the police. This is when we can consider a security perimeter but, alas, too late in this case. In fact, the parents' apartment has already been contaminated by a continuous coming and going. By dozens of people who came in and out of the room. Not to mention the fact that the cleaning was done in the room before the arrival of the police. This is when we can consider a security perimeter but, alas, too late in this case. In fact, the parents' apartment has already been contaminated by a continuous coming and going. By dozens of people who came in and out of the room. Not to mention the fact that the cleaning was done in the room before the arrival of the police.
At this stage of the investigation, the PJ will proceed to numerous hearings. Will continue to organize a fight.Will pick up the clues and contradictions in the testimonials. It is to proceed by elimination. We close the doors as we say within the police. This principle consists of checking each track until it leads to a dead end.So we can say that the door of this track is closed.
Detectives to the rescue.
There are a multitude of detective agencies of all kinds. Typically, these agencies operate primarily on simple surveys. Brooding of unfaithful husband / wife, search for associate's background, family search, descent search, etc. All detectives, a little unprofessional, will tell you: As soon as the investigation becomes complicated or dangerous or rub shoulders with illegal environments, in short as soon as you leave a context of simple investigation, the case is transmitted to the police who take over. Remember that our laws do not allow detectives to be armed. This might explain that. Sometimes, behind the facade of detectives, lies a criminal organization. Practicing blackmail, intimidation, illegal eavesdropping, industrial espionage etc. etc.This leads to talk about the Spanish agency, Metodo3. Some detectives in this agency are suspected of extortion and attempted homicide while working for the McCann couple. We will not mention the detective involved and arrested for drug trafficking. However, we remain puzzled by the fact that this agency pays witnesses to declare that they have seen Madeleine as revealed by SOS Maddie!
Either Madeleine has been kidnapped, and in this case the attitude of Metodo3 is criminal. To pretend that Madeleine is at this or that place, on the basis of false testimony paid by them, makes them accomplices in the abduction. If Maddie has been kidnapped, their stories only blur the tracks and it's criminal. I, in the place of the parents, I dismiss them on the spot.
Either Madeleine was not abducted and died by accident in the parents' apartment and in this case, the grotesque attitude of Metodo3 has no other purpose than to try to rally some of the public opinion to the thesis defended by the parents, trying to believe that Maddie is alive somewhere. And in this case one may wonder why want to manipulate the public opinion? What truth must be hidden?
The McCann Law
Clarence Mitchell spokesman McCann's parents said that the newspapers that published contents of the book Gonçalo Amaral, the truth of the lie, were very brave or very stupid. Leaving implied that the trials could fall and the damages that go hand in hand. Thus Clarence Mitchell wants to muzzle all those who have a different opinion than the official parents. Forums and blogs of all kinds could be their next target. May Mr. Mitchell remember that we are in a state of law and not under a dictatorship. People have the right to express an opinion and to give their point of view even if it does not fit the McCann line. As the editor of the Correio da Manha pointed out, there is freedom of expression which, without offending anyone, still allows to describe and say different things than those said by McCann and Clarence Mitchell. Recalling to Mr. Mitchell, who seems to need it, that the file is not a declaration of absolution. This archiving does not whiten parents recall Gonçalo Amaral. In fact, Mr. Mitchell, to make war on anyone who speaks other than you, who has another speech on the forums, in newspapers or on blogs is utopian. The laws are different from one country to another, Mr Mitchell will soon face the same problems as the police to fight against pedophile websites. It is almost impossible to get all these sites to be muzzled. Certainly, to guide by money, perhaps one will try to make an example in the UK. To raise a little more money still. Money going to the fund to save Madeleine, of course. Fund to be used to leave no stone returned. Except, perhaps that of the reconstitution. What was one afraid of finding under this stone? Perhaps precisely ... THE TRUTH. While parents complain that they have not gone on vacation since the disappearance of Madeleine, Clarence Mitchell wants to fight with all those who do not speak the same language as him and the parents. That energy and time spent to impose his point of view. For nothing! Should not we spend this energy to find Madeleine or have we already forgotten? While parents complain that they have not gone on vacation since the disappearance of Madeleine, Clarence Mitchell wants to fight with all those who do not speak the same language as him and the parents. That energy and time spent to impose his point of view. For nothing! Should not we spend this energy to find Madeleine or have we already forgotten? While parents complain that they have not gone on vacation since the disappearance of Madeleine, Clarence Mitchell wants to fight with all those who do not speak the same language as him and the parents. That energy and time spent to impose his point of view. For nothing! Should not we spend this energy to find Madeleine or have we already forgotten?
React to this article on the forum |
| The truth of lies |  July 24, 2008
The truth of the lie.
The PJ's lex-inspector's book, Gonçalo Amaral, is officially presented today in Lisbon. The book will revive the controversy over the Maddie affair which is about to become the McCann affair. Is the truth of lies the truth?The question is asked and the answer is hard to pin down. Certainly, the book is a reflection of a certain truth. The one seen by the eyes of a police inspector in charge of a complex and very publicized file. The book, in turn, has been the subject of a certain marketing staging and international media coverage. If the publishers wanted to play it that way, great do them. This does not mean that the content of the book is not right. Amaral reveals the main reasons that have always led him to beware of Gerry, Kate and their friends.
Defamation?
Is there any defamation in the remarks made by Gonçalo in his book? The passage on the pedophile friend makes run a lot of ink. The forums of all horizons crumble under the comments. According to the Larousse Encyclopedia, defamation is an expression of unfounded harm to reputation and the honor of a person. The notion of unfoundedness is important in law. If one analyzes serenely what is written, there is no defamatory.Gonçalo Amaral naccuse nobody! He does not say quuntel is this or that! He speaks simply of a statement made in May 2007 by British and collected by the authorities of the same country AND only joined the file several months later, in January 2008! The concern of Amalal is to emphasize that this statement, which seems to him important for the investigation, only arrived several months late. He does not lie. He does not invent the content and he is not responsible for it. Admittedly, he refers to the content of the deposition. But where is the problem ? The content of this statement will be made public at the end of the legal deadline! In addition, he puts no label on anyone! It is a certain Portuguese press and, above all, the participants in forums of all kinds who have peddled gossip that Amalal did not have! In the end, what does this statement contain? Nothing in particular. A lady said she saw a man have obscene gestures that in his education shocked him. She states that this man would have had the same gestures later about Madeleine and that made the decision not to let him approach the children during their bath. The man whose question, who is the organizer of the trip to Praia da Luz, as he was the one in Majorca 2 years earlier where the lady declares that she saw her having questionable gestures. The participants in the forums are mistaken for debate. The question is not to know if there is defamation in the head of Amalfi but to wonder how easy it is to record this kind of testimony?
Important element of the investigation?
Gonçalo Amaral writes that this statement is a crucial element or in any case indispensable to the file.Emphasizing that the fact that this testimony arrived several months later was detrimental to the investigation. Our professional opinion is that this testimony becomes important only if it is proven that the suspect was referring to Madeleine AND as far as the latter is already known to the courts or the police for pedophile facts. In this case, and only in this case, this testimony is of paramount importance.
Designate where the body of Madeleine is
In his book, Amaral reveals that he, along with several other inspectors, naively believed that Kate was willing to tell them, without committing herself, the place where Madeleine's body was and that this place was to be in the Praia area. da Luz. At one point, the book says, Maddie's mom began sending investigators information that she was receiving from people with psychic or paranormal powers about where Madeleine's body could be found. A month after Maddie's disappearance, she accepted the hypothesis of Madeleine's death, while asserting the opposite publicly.
Auditions do not coincide
The book also talks about the famous hearings of the group of friends who have caused trouble since the beginning of the investigation. The depositions made by the group about the night of the events, and during which they were having dinner together, do not match. There are differences in hours, sequences and details.The authorities even received two different lists, with different hours, written by hand by the group, about the hours when the different members of the group went to control the children. In one of the two documents there is an attempt to fill voids. Kate gave the alarm at 10:00 pm and she guarantees that the window of the children's room was open and that the shutters were up. Jane guarantees that at around 9:20 pm / 9:25 pm a man is carrying a child under his arm. Moments later, another member of the group, Matthew, goes to the apartments to check the children, it is 21:30. The windows are closed.
As a professional faced with this kind of inconsistency, only one conclusion seems obvious. Someone, or several people in the group, lie or manipulate others. This obviousness stems from other questions, including: why? What purpose ? The most flagrant way to put people in front of their lies and contradictions and put them in their context by putting their nose in their mistakes. And for that, one thing to do is a reconstruction!
Going back to the book, another element that left Gonçalo Amaral puzzled came the day after Maddie's disappearance. That day someone said he saw a girl like Maddie at a gas station and the station would have video footage. Kate, who had previously been questioned by the PJ, reported being disturbed by the speed at which the service vehicle traveling on the scene was traveling and she would not have shown the slightest glimmer of hope as they drove to pick up her daughter.
Call log deleted.
The day after Maddie's disappearance, the PC asks parents to check their mobile phones. They discover that between April 27 and May 4, Kate did not make any calls and that she did not receive a call between May 2 at 11:22 am and the night at 11:17 pm. Gerry, meanwhile, has no call received or given in his diary call.However, the inspectors know that Kate's cell phone indicates the receipt of a call by her husband, which she received at 11:17 pm on May 3rd. But in Gerry's, nothing is found. The PC concludes that the call log has been erased from her cell phone. The question that the PJ asks itself is: why?
Room perfectly tidy.
The room was perfectly tidy and it did not seem like Madeleine had slept in her bed. The kidnapper would have had, at the time of the removal, to move something of the height of the grid of the window, but nothing made it possible to indicate it. In addition, it seems impossible that the window could be opened from the outside. Even the shutters, which were raised according to the parents, could only be from the inside. There was no sign of breaking on the front door. Just the sofa had been moved from its original location to the parents' arrival at the beginning of the holidays. There is still this Irish family on holiday in Praia da Luz who claims to have seen a man carrying a girl at 9:55 pm, in an area in a direction quite contrary to Jane's testimony. The depositions of the three members of the Irish family are considered credible. They are certain that it was Madeleine and give a description of the clothes she wore but they could not identify the man who was wearing it. Subsequently, this family got in touch with the authorities because after seeing Gerry with one of the twins, they realized that he was the one they had seen that night.
From a professional point of view, this testimony is important. It allows to establish that Madeleine had not disappeared yet at 9:55 pm on the evening of May 3rd! On the other hand, that does not mean that Gerry has anything to do with the rest of the events. Do not draw hasty conclusions.
The diplomatic ballet.
On the night of Madeleine's disappearance, the director of the PJ, who was having dinner in Lisbon with friends, received a call on his private cell, from British diplomacy, asking if he knew that an English girl was missing! He contacted the PC who was not aware of it yet. She even contacted the GRN who had just received the call. The day after the disappearance, the British consul went to the Department of Criminal Investigation (DIC) of the PJ Portimao. Later, it was the turn of the Ambassador himself to enter the scene. Gonçalo Amaral has rightly asked, if it were normal this preoccupation of the English diplomacy? Are they so with all British couples? Amaral says he was sure the case would be treated as a political issue after Kate and Gerry contacted British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. The analyzed results made by the British laboratory are another mystery yet says Amaral. At first, the analyzes confirm a track and in the following document completely ignore data that has been certified in the first document sent. As for example, the markers (out of 19 possible) which coincide with the DNA profile of Madeleine. the analyzes confirm a track and in the following document completely ignore data that has been certified in the first document sent. As for example, the markers (out of 19 possible) which coincide with the DNA profile of Madeleine. the analyzes confirm a track and in the following document completely ignore data that has been certified in the first document sent. As for example, the markers (out of 19 possible) which coincide with the DNA profile of Madeleine.
Gerry strong casual.
Another episode left Amaral speechless. In a room where they were all gathered, they were waiting for a contact with an informant who said he knew where Madeleine was hidden. He would say it in exchange for money. Gerry, in the same room as the PJ's inspectors and negotiators, Scotland Yard agents and Leicestershire police officers were very casual. The tension was high in the room, the tension was rising. On the other hand, Gerry's casualness contrasted with the police's excitement and puzzled all investigators including those of Scotland Yard. Gerry quietly sipped a local appetizer and exchanged banalities about the internet and discussed rugby with someone from the English police.
React to this article on the forum |
| The end of the investigation? |  July 22, 2008
Does file larchivage mean the end of the investigation?
The PJ assured on Tuesday that it will continue to follow all the tracks concerning the disappearance of Maddie. On Monday, the PGR announced the archiving of the case file Maddie and to lift the status of darguidos of the only three suspects in this case. The Public Ministry has decided to file the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, for lack of evidence that suspected people have committed the slightest crime said a statement from the PGR. As a result, the MP decided to suspend the status of parents and Luso-British, Robert Murat. The PM also clarified that the case could be reopened if new evidence emerges and confirmed that any person who will show a legitimate interest (ie: legally or judicially valid) will have access to the investigation documents as soon as the legal period has expired. So what ? The Maddie affair will sink into oblivion until, by chance, something miraculously appears in the open? That we fall, during work on the body of the girl? Until someone confesses? Of course not ! It seems that this is not the path followed by the members of the PJ. The Criminal Investigation Department (DIC) of Portimao will be briefly strengthened to deal with the possibility of new avenues or elements that could be analyzed in the context of the Maddie case. For some time now, there has been a certain excitement within the PJ. New tracks seemed to be checked in absolute secrecy. It is not excluded that the PC is holding something.Whatever the case may be, the file remains open. Indeed, the disappearance of little Maddie is not resolved.To my knowledge we have not found the baby or her body yet. And as long as we do not find Madeleine, or her body, the file will remain open!
Échec de la police ?
The fact that 14 months after the start of the investigation, the PJ was not able to demonstrate what had happened to Madeleine is for many considered a failure. And that's right, it's a failure. The fact that the police do not arrest the perpetrator (s) of a crime or offense is a failure. But, nothing, absolutely nothing, can not be reproached to the Portuguese PJ. They did not skimp on the means and as soon as the investigation was placed in the hands of the PJ, she was pursued very professionally. The PC stayed the course in an over-hyped case. Faced with extremely strong political pressures and totally unworthy in the context of a child disappearance. Faced with a machine in communication and marketing perfectly oiled.Faced with unprecedented financial strength. Against all odds, the PJ kept his professionalism, its rigor and impartiality. Proof, if any, of the objectivity of the final report. It's easy to criticize after blows! To say: but we should have done this or that. Criticism often made by people who did not even know that this or that procedure existed! Thus, we strongly condemn the press of all kinds and their journalist junk having no idea about police procedure when it reads articles like: The PC made a very big mistake! She should have immediately made a security perimeter. Avoid that the crime site is contaminated ... Of course, a security perimeter would have been better to do. It's even the world procedure !!! In application in all the fonts of the World! Any candidate who has missed his exam to become a police inspector knows it! But, Initially, it was not a crime! He was a lost child, nothing more. He was a 4-year-old girl in a foreign country left alone and lost in the surrounding countryside trying to reach her parents. Nobody, in the forces of the order, thought of entering an abduction game. And that's normal! This is the procedure. The elements of the kidnapping were not gathered and according to the PJ still would not be!
Founded suspicion
For several months we have been talking about a fundamental principle of our democracy which is the notion of presumption of innocence. One of the last bulwarks of democracy is the police, no offense to some.Without police we can imagine the rate of robberies, rapes, murders, crimes and offenses of all kinds and so on. One of the principles of operation of a police force, is based on the concept of founded suspicion. What is founded suspicion. It is a set of troubling elements, put end to end, that allow, in any case, to think that a person is guilty or involved in something. The elements in the possession of the PC and contained in the file allow the investigators to have founded suspicions with regard to the parents. It is through this kind of suspicion that the police can pursue a track. Then gather all the elements and finally lead to one or more proofs. The line between substantiated suspicion and material evidence is sometimes thin, especially for a person. So, a drawing worth more than 1,000 words, I suggest the following parallel:
In summer, A night patrol, during its round hears a sound of glass at a few meters two, just last corner. In less than 5 seconds, the police are at the scene of the crime. A cul-de-sac street, from which no one could escape without passing the patrol. On the spot, the team finds two individuals wearing gloves, back turned to a parked vehicle whose window has just been broken. On the ground, next to the two individuals, is a car radio with stripped wires and on the other side of the two individuals, the panoply of the perfect little thief. No other way out is possible and no one could escape without being seen by the patrol who was nearby. The police leave the vehicle, question the two individuals who have just passed under suspicious status. PV will be trained for theft
For you, for me, for the police officers involved, it is clear that individuals are the culprits. The magistrate will however relax them for lack of evidence! In fact, they claim their innocence and claim that they went on the spot after hearing a noise from the window and that the objects next to them do not belong to them and as no one saw them commit the offense, not even the police, has no proof. There is well-founded suspicion in the eyes of the police. But there is no evidence in the eyes of the magistrate, there is a doubt. The suspects are no longer and are relaxed!
Here is a little caricatural explanation of what is a well founded suspicion. In the Maddie case, the first well-founded suspicion appeared to the investigators as early as the first night, when Madeleine even disappeared.This suspicion appeared obvious to the professionals when Kate, having waited 10 minutes in the apartment, returned ONLY, leaving the twins sleeping in the apartment where it had unfolded, according to her, a crime.Saying: they took it away, they kidnapped it But without protecting his two other children from a predator who might still be hiding on the spot or come back to remove the twins. A mother would have woken her cubs and brought them with her to protect them from danger. And that was the first suspicion of the police.Others, later, came to swell the rank.
The fact that the PGR is decided to archive the case and to suspend the status of the 3 suspects does not make them innocent so far and according to the presumption of innocence, does not make them guilty, either!
|
| 
Kate McCann
We welcome the news, even if there is no reason to rejoice, said Kate McCann in a brief statement read in the village of Rothley, in central England, where the couple lives. We will never give up: Madeleine's parents now hope that this ranking of the case for lack of evidence will allow them to relaunch the campaign of international mobilization, which was running out of steam.
Alipio Ribeiro
PJ director Alipio Ribeiro believes that the Maddie case has been rushed to court. He points out that the search time for a child can last for several years. A rushed archiving can hinder, perhaps definitively, a later solution. A case of missing a minor can not be closed, for lack of evidence, so soon after the tragedy, considers Alipio Ribeiro in a ticket published by the Diario Economico. The time of the investigation is not the time of the news or its media memory, even less when it comes to the disappearance of a child, said Mr. Ribeiro, who had resigned last May, saying he was tired of the media coverage of his office. He ends his interview by saying: perhaps it would have been more judicious to suspend the status of the suspects and, in a certain context,
Gonçalo Amaral.
Lex-inspector Gonçalo Amaral, who led the investigation, before being moved in October for criticizing his British colleagues, finds that the filing of the court proceedings does not mean that the girl's parents were laundered. This is not a statement of innocence. The prosecution does not say they are innocent, he reacted Tuesday. Originally charged with indicting McCann, Gonçalo Amaral, now retired, is due to present Thursday the book he has written about the case, Maddie - The Truth of the Lie. In this book, he promises facts to support his belief that Maddie died in the Praia da Luz apartment where she slept the night of her disappearance.
React to this article on the forum
|
| A pedophile friend? |  July 20, 2008
Do not lift the secrecy of the law.
A magistrate and two police officers, including Stuart Prior, a liaison officer with the PJ, went to the District Court of Portimao to ask the Public Prosecutor's Office not to release the secret of justice on the entire Maddie case. The motives behind this move would be diverse, according to the Portuguese press. There is, on the one hand, the fact that the British police want to keep secret the contents of the list of British nationals classified as pedophiles living in the Algarve. These known pedophiles have been clearly identified on a list that the UK authorities gave to the PJ and which is part of the Maddie file. The lifting of the secrecy of justice would make the contents of the list accessible to the public. Another reason, according to the Portuguese press, would be the request not to lift the secrecy of justice on the results of the DNA tests. It would seem that the English do not wish to see the preliminary report of the Birmingham lab in which it is established that 15 of the 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. This report was opposed thereafter. The remains gathered behind the sofa, according to the first report, also coincide with Madeleine McCann's DNA profile. It was this report that comforted the PJ, as well as the British liaison officer, in their suspicions that Madeleine died between 5:30 pm and 10:00 pm at the Ocean Club in Praia da Luz and that the body was transported in the car rented by the parents. , 22 days later. With the lifting of the secrecy of justice, some of these documents will be made public. This report, added to the elements gathered during the investigation led the inspectors to suspect the parents of the death of Madeleine.Another report, signed by Mark Harrisom, a British police officer appointed to assist the Portuguese authorities, stated conclusively that the girl had died. The policeman even mentioned the possibility that Madeleine's body was thrown into the sea.
Advanced technique.
The technique used by British specialists to analyze the remains collected in the apartment and in the parents' car is one of the most sophisticated in the world. This technique is used in the United States because it allows to extract precise DNA profiles from very weak vestiges by the increase of the amplification cycles.In these reports, sent to the PJ with a few months of differences, the authorities begin to explain the technique used and report how they used a sample of Madeleine McCann's DNA reference. This sample was obtained via existing saliva stains on the small cushion. DNA from other members of the family has been verified to extract the identical genetic markers so that there is no confusion in the result. The report is 22 pages long and signed by a biochemist expert and specialist in microbiology. He determines that 15 out of 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. The second report, sent after Kate and Gerry were declared suspects, raises theoretical doubts about the findings of the first report. We are talking here about 15 out of 19 markers. In the United States to condemn someone who only needs 12 conclusive DNA markers. Thus, in the United States, on the basis of this report, the parents would be accused. But in Portugal, the law requiring 19 identical markers, the parents could benefit from a place not even see a classification of the file. He determines that 15 out of 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. The second report, sent after Kate and Gerry were declared suspects, raises theoretical doubts about the findings of the first report. We are talking here about 15 out of 19 markers. In the United States to condemn someone who only needs 12 conclusive DNA markers. Thus, in the United States, on the basis of this report, the parents would be accused. But in Portugal, the law requiring 19 identical markers, the parents could benefit from a place not even see a classification of the file. He determines that 15 out of 19 genetic markers coincide perfectly with Madeleine McCann's DNA. The second report, sent after Kate and Gerry were declared suspects, raises theoretical doubts about the findings of the first report. We are talking here about 15 out of 19 markers. In the United States to condemn someone who only needs 12 conclusive DNA markers. Thus, in the United States, on the basis of this report, the parents would be accused. But in Portugal, the law requiring 19 identical markers, the parents could benefit from a place not even see a classification of the file. In the United States to convict someone it only takes 12 conclusive DNA markers.Thus, in the United States, on the basis of this report, the parents would be accused. But in Portugal, the law requiring 19 identical markers, the parents could benefit from a place not even see a classification of the file. In the United States to convict someone it only takes 12 conclusive DNA markers. Thus, in the United States, on the basis of this report, the parents would be accused. But in Portugal, the law requiring 19 identical markers, the parents could benefit from a place not even see a classification of the file.
A pedophile friend?
The Portuguese press through the Correio da Manha publishes a rather delicate article. According to the latter, one of the friends of the couple McCann who was with them on holiday in Paria da Luz on May 3 of last year was suspected of pedophile behavior. These charges were initiated by another pair of friends who spent the 2005 holidays with the McCanns. The couple, Kate's childhood friends, have been acquainted with Kate for 20 years and they met the suspect friend only once, in 2005. The CM reports a statement recorded by the authorities on May 16th but filed in the January 2008 issue. would already be part of the 13th volume on the case. We are quite surprised that police officers have recorded these depositions. Indeed, they are not based on anything. There was nothing to do! If we resume the publication of the CM, Katherina, Kate's girlfriend, would have seen, during the night, the famous friend suspicious in conversation with Gerry having obscene gestures with sexual characters while talking about Madeleine. Describing the gesture with details clearly referring to a vaginal fingering previously wet by the mouth. Her husband, Arul, remembers the gesture, which he describes as extremely bad taste, but can not be sure that the suspect friend and Gerry were talking about Madeleine! In short, nothing really concrete. In any case not enough to record a statement. The two fellows could perfectly talk about anyone or hint at anything. In addition, revealing the identity of the friend in question and calling him a suspected pedophile, puts a family at risk. A family but also a professional situation, a social life etc. etc. It seems to us very imprudent to make public this kind of accusation. We draw our readers' attention to the fact that we must not draw hasty conclusions. Do not accuse someone too quickly, do not put a label on someone who may have nothing to reproach himself with. Be subtle, it is easier to destroy a reputation than to restore the image of someone. There is nothing to prove that the suspect friend is guilty of what is charged. do not put a tag on a person who may have nothing to reproach himself with. Be subtle, it is easier to destroy a reputation than to restore the image of someone. There is nothing to prove that the suspect friend is guilty of what is charged. do not put a tag on a person who may have nothing to reproach himself with. Be subtle, it is easier to destroy a reputation than to restore the image of someone.There is nothing to prove that the suspect friend is guilty of what is charged.
React to this article on the forum
|
| The consequences to give |  July 16, 2008
Press release regarding the follow-up.
On Monday, July 21, the Attorney General of the Republic (PGR) will issue a press release regarding the Madeleine McCann case. The announcement was made today by the public prosecutor, Pinto Monteiro, who did not reveal any other details. Laffaire Maddie will have, Monday, a solution that will be communicated to the press said Pinto Monteiro to reporters. The PGR confirms that at the beginning of the month it received the PJ's full report on the Maddie case.
600,000 euros in moral damages.
The amounts vary from one newspaper to the other, from 500,000 euros, to 800,000 euros or a million euros.In any event, an average of 600,000 is the probable estimate of the amount of harm claimed by Robert Murat's lawyers. It is thanks to an agreement with 11 British newspapers that Robert Murat will cash this sum.Newspapers will still have to issue an apology. The agreement will have to be validated in court on Thursday.The newspapers in question are:
- Daily Star
- Daily Express
- Daily Mail
- London Evening Standard
- Metro
- Daily Mirror
- Sunday Mirror
- News of the World
- Sun
- Scotsman
- Sky news (TV channel)
The amount of compensation Murat will receive is similar to the one McCann's parents got last March.Remember, the Daily Express, the Daily Star, and the Sunday Express paid compensation and apologized.
React to this article on the forum
|
| Final report (more ...) |  July 09, 2008
Doubts and disturbing elements.
Appendix 886 of the final report contains the typewritten auditions of the couple's friends, made by the British police, before being formally questioned by the Portuguese PJ after the disappearance of Madeleine.For the Portuguese authorities, the very meticulous way in which the couple's friends recalled the conduct of the evening of May 3 does not involve any emotion. So, for example, in the group damis some had children asleep alone in their hotel room. Why did not they, instinctively, see if their children were fine after Kate reported Madeleine's disappearance? They ran to help look for Maddie but they did not go to see if their children had not been so kidnapped! This document is considered important by the authorities. It is fundamental for investigators to know what happened in the hours preceding his disappearance. Now a description of the routine moments of relatives and friends as well as a complete description of the last moments when Maddie was seen alive, is fundamental for research to clarify doubts and explain devious incongruities. Gerry McCann says that day, and unlike other days, he did not accompany his friends. Gerry assured that that day, they were searched for the twins at the nursery and Madeleine around 17:00 and they returned directly to their apartment. At 9:00 pm, Gerry claims to have gone to see her children. He would not have gone into Madeleine's room (where the twins were also sleeping) and only later would he put a premium on the fact that the bedroom door was more open than he had left. The alert was given at 22:00 and the GNR was notified only one hour later. The British say they informed the BBC about 02:00 in the morning.
Other assumptions
In addition to the abduction thesis, the theory of passion crime has also been studied. The PC has looked into the possibility of possible revenge against the parents. Nothing concrete came out, no clue, or beginning of index could be detected. The PJ has scrutinized the lives of parents and their English friends without any suspicion emerging. We can also tell you, and it is an exclusivity, that the assumption that the parents, with or without the group damis, organized or participated in a special evening (Editor's note: Soiree pedophile) that would have gone wrong, was considered in the same way as any other tracks ... but was soon abandoned.
Questions that remained unanswered
The final report states questions left unanswered. These answers should have found answers in the reconstitution of the evening. The first of these questions is where Jane Tanner, Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins (a witness who spoke with Gerry around 9:00 pm) were and what exactly they were doing. According to the report, it seems anomalous that in the cramped space where they were, Gerry and Jeremy did not see the potential abductor described by Jane. Second, the audit of how children were controlled was important.Being in the places reported by the witnesses makes it impossible for a kidnapper to remove Madeleine and this should have been verified via the reconstitution. Finally,
What does it conclude?
Nothing. No hasty rainfall. The final report, of which a small excerpt has been revealed by the press and reproduced here, shows only doubts and inconsistencies. He does not accuse. We are not partisans of one camp or another, but if there is to be one, then it will be that of the moderates. We are against extremists of all kinds, be it those who refuse, at all costs, to consider the possibility that parents are guilty by being ready to invent the wildest excuses of each other; or that it is those who want the parents to be potential assassins who sacrificed Madeleine. The good father will be between these two positions, he will be more moderate.But we must be honest with ourselves and recognize that the elements raised in these last three articles are very disturbing and do not go in the direction of the innocence of the parents, without however formally accusing them either. Do not fall into speculation but it seems clear that one or more people in the T9 lies!It's obvious. Just as is evident the lack of cooperation of some of them. But for what purpose? The only acceptable conclusion for the moment is that because of their lies, we still do not know where Madeleine is or her body. The body of Madeleine found would allow parents (if they are innocent) to mourn! Do not fall into speculation but it seems clear that one or more people in the T9 lies! It's obvious. Just as is evident the lack of cooperation of some of them. But for what purpose? The only acceptable conclusion for the moment is that because of their lies, we still do not know where Madeleine is or her body. The body of Madeleine found would allow parents (if they are innocent) to mourn! Do not fall into speculation but it seems clear that one or more people in the T9 lies! It's obvious. Just as is evident the lack of cooperation of some of them. But for what purpose? The only acceptable conclusion for the moment is that because of their lies, we still do not know where Madeleine is or her body. The body of Madeleine found would allow parents (if they are innocent) to mourn!
React to this article on the forum |
| An Irish witness |  July 07, 2008
An Irish witness saw Gerry carrying Maddie.
Martin Smith, an Irishman, told the Judicial Police that he saw a man carrying a child under his arm. This child seemed to be Maddie. The facts would have occurred substantially at the time of dinner on the evening of May 3. The hearing of the witness was gathered from the beginning of the search. A few days after returning to his home country, Martin Smith went to the police. He guaranteed that seeing on TV, following the media coverage of the case, for the first time the face of Gerry coming down from a plane, he had no doubt. The man who was carrying the child the day Maddie disappeared was his father! The information was sent to the Portuguese authorities at a stage where the PJ was still concentrating on the abduction thesis.And, according to the final report, the track would not have been followed because by the time Martin says he saw Gerry carrying Maddie under his arm, he was having dinner with the couple's friends at the Tapas Bar.Only later did the PJ realize that no one in the T9 could tell exactly what time each group member was in the restaurant. The PJ then requested further inquiries from this witness via letters rogatory. The additional duties concerning this witness were finally not realized and without other elements could be deepened. Only later did the PJ realize that no one in the T9 could tell exactly what time each member of the group was in the restaurant. The PJ then requested further inquiries from this witness via letters rogatory. The additional duties concerning this witness were finally not realized and without other elements could be deepened. Only later did the PJ realize that no one in the T9 could tell exactly what time each group member was in the restaurant. The PJ then requested further inquiries from this witness via letters rogatory. The additional duties concerning this witness were finally not realized and without other elements could be deepened.
British police hand over certain elements of the McCann's investigations.
Britain's police agreed on Monday to provide Madeleine McCann's parents with some evidence from her case about the girl's disappearance in southern Portugal in May 2007 to allow private investigators they recruited to examine them. In return, Kate and Gerry McCann have waived a legal procedure to force the police in Leicestershire, the county of central England where they live, to provide them with this information. Kate and Gerry McCann are satisfied with this compromise reached with the police, said their spokesman Clarence Mitchell. If we had not gone to court, we would not have obtained these 81 pieces (information). The whole file would contain nearly 11,000 documents. They are now going to our private investigators who will work on it first. It is hard to believe that these documents should be used by Metodo3 for the sole purpose of finding Madeleine. It seems difficult that this company with dubious reputation and low legal means can do better than the PJ who put on the case more than 300 men !! It remains to be seen whether the 81 documents and hearings also contain the testimony of the two crucial witnesses whose hearings have not yet been sent to the Portuguese authorities. If so, it is more like a maneuver to prepare a defense rather than looking for a missing girl! It remains to be seen whether the 81 documents and hearings also contain the testimony of the two crucial witnesses whose hearings have not yet been sent to the Portuguese authorities. If so, it is more like a maneuver to prepare a defense rather than looking for a missing girl! It remains to be seen whether the 81 documents and hearings also contain the testimony of the two crucial witnesses whose hearings have not yet been sent to the Portuguese authorities. If so, it is more like a maneuver to prepare a defense rather than looking for a missing girl!
Metodo3 implicated by the PJ.
The final report criticizes the research done by the agency of private detectives hired by the couple. It is because of this that the PC has lost a lot of time, money and energy to follow, check, compare, analyze all the false tracks launched by Metodo3 everywhere. There was the testimony of Gail Cooper, heard for the first time by the British authorities. He speaks of a beggar, whom he saw only once and who could have taken the child. Later, at the private detective agency hired by the couple, he claims to have seen the same beggar three times. And that one of those three times there, he surprised her to look in a strange way at the child group that Maddie was part of. Then it was Jane Tanner who did not succeed, initially, to describe the face of the man that guarantees to have seen carrying Maddie under his arm, to return on his declarations. She declares that the man seen by Cooper looks like the one she saw. The robot portrait went around the world and forced the PC to check hundreds of tracks that proved to be wrong. Not to mention that the PJ had to go to the most remote places on the planet. The same day and at the same time, Maddie arrived to be seen more than 4,000 kilometers away !! The report suggests that if we had wanted to slow down the investigation, to see what kind of naboutisse, we would not be caught otherwise. The robot portrait went around the world and forced the PC to check hundreds of tracks that proved to be wrong. Not to mention that the PJ had to go to the most remote places on the planet. The same day and at the same time, Maddie arrived to be seen more than 4,000 kilometers away !! The report suggests that if we had wanted to slow down the investigation, to see what kind of naboutisse, we would not be caught otherwise. The robot portrait went around the world and forced the PC to check hundreds of tracks that proved to be wrong. Not to mention that the PJ had to go to the most remote places on the planet. The same day and at the same time, Maddie arrived to be seen more than 4,000 kilometers away !! The report suggests that if we had wanted to slow down the investigation, to see what kind of naboutisse, we would not be caught otherwise.
The British modified the results of exams.
It was the strangest volte face in the investigation. The first analyzes of biological remains, made in the UK, residues collected under the spare wheel, in the trunk of the car rented by the parents, were compatible with the genetic profile of Madeleine. Later, after the parents were designated arguidos or suspected to have hidden the body of Madeleine, the laboratory announced correcting its initial analyzes. After blows, the biological remains found in the Renault Scénic rented by the parents were not conclusive in addition, the quality of the samples was suddenly questioned. This scientific reversal, not yet fully clarified, risks sending the investigation into a dead end. Indeed, the doubt always benefits the accused. Now, if one of the largest laboratories analyzes, suddenly, in doubt the samples themselves, it will be any benefit for the defense. It should be noted, however, that the use of dogs that detect corpse odors or blood residues is quite valid in the Portuguese legal system and the laboratory should have corroborated the dog markings scientifically. The decision of the PJ to send these analyzes to the UK, which could have been done in Portugal, was in the initial view, a question of credibility. The inspectors did not want the results to be questionable in the UK.that the use of dogs that detect corpse odors or blood residues is quite valid in the Portuguese legal system and the laboratory would have had to scientifically corroborate dog markings. The decision of the PJ to send these analyzes to the UK, which could have been done in Portugal, was in the initial view, a question of credibility. The inspectors did not want the results to be questionable in the UK. that the use of dogs that detect corpse odors or blood residues is quite valid in the Portuguese legal system and the laboratory would have had to scientifically corroborate dog markings. The decision of the PJ to send these analyzes to the UK, which could have been done in Portugal, was in the initial view, a question of credibility. The inspectors did not want the results to be questionable in the UK.
React to this article on the forum
|
| 5 years in prison? |  July 06, 2008
Parents risk up to 5 years in prison.
The principle of child neglect to which the McCanns, in the night of May 3, 2007, in an apartment of Praia Da Luz, is, according to Portuguese law, an unavoidable fact that appears in more than 50 pages of the final report of the PJ. The research has focused on the thesis of homicide and the Public Ministry must focus on this thesis, can not ignore, under Portuguese law, the negligence of parents McCann on this night. The PJ in this report is to make the prosecutor in charge of the file the slightest proposal to classify the case or to prosecute the parents. Similarly, the PC does not consider the negligent or recklessness of the parents, nor do they lose in the legal aspect of this situation. The objective pursued by the police was to prove a homicide and miscultation of a corpse. So the ranking without continuation of the file can not be done. The Portuguese law does not allow us to forget the parents' case: children in an apartment open windows, door closed only with a lock; a visual contact about the accommodation that the parents claimed to have and that they actually did not have; or the contradictions within the friends of the couple about visits to children! It is about child abandonment or neglect of children, punished up to 5 years in prison !! door closed only with a lock; a visual contact about the accommodation that the parents claimed to have and that they actually did not have; or the contradictions within the friends of the couple about visits to children! It is about child abandonment or neglect of children, punished up to 5 years in prison !! door closed only with a lock; a visual contact about the accommodation that the parents claimed to have and that they actually did not have; or the contradictions within the friends of the couple about visits to children! It is about child abandonment or neglect of children, punished up to 5 years in prison !!
The abduction thesis is impossible.
The PJ's report excludes the kidnapping hypothesis, thereby antagonizing the parents' version, Kate and Gerry. In fact, the window of the apartment rented by the McCann couple was too small for a child to be transported. In addition, despite the fact that specialized dogs detected traces of blood in the house as well as in the car, rented by Madeleine's parents and that Kate's clothes and some of Madeleine's clothes bore the corpse smell, the window she , contained no remnants of Madeleine's DNA but only from Kate. In addition, Portuguese law punishes anyone who opens the conditions for kidnapping. Which means that the creation of danger is punished, regardless of knowing the outcome. But in the case that concerns us, the result would be the eventual kidnapping of Madeleine as claimed by the parents and, they are themselves who create the objective conditions to kidnap! Leaving three children alone, in an apartment in a foreign country, going to dinner without having direct contact with children is, according to Portuguese law, the conditions that open the conditions for kidnapping. And we do not even talk about the many contradictions about the number of visits to children or by whom, besides it was not the first night that the children were alone. the conditions that open the conditions to an abduction. And we do not even talk about the many contradictions about the number of visits to children or by whom, besides it was not the first night that the children were alone. the conditions that open the conditions to an abduction. And we do not even talk about the many contradictions about the number of visits to children or by whom, besides it was not the first night that the children were alone.
UPDATE:
The assertions of the various McCann friends are not consistent. According to the statements of the famous Tapas9, Madeleine was abducted about an hour before the warning of her disappearance was given. It is Jane Tanner who guarantees to have surprised a stranger in a street where, for information, was the dad of Maddie, Gerry but also other witnesses. These two other witnesses affirmed having seen nothing while being in the same angle of vision as Jane Tanner. Tanner who later made a robot portrait of the alleged kidnapper stating that the man was carrying a child in a horizontal position (under the arm). We explained, above, that Madeleine could not have gone through the window in a horizontal position. The only possibility would have been to move it to a vertical position ... that is to say, by putting the head or feet first and then letting it slide along the window but also along the wall of the apartment. In this case, it would have required an accomplice who catches the child down the wall. Then the kidnapper in the apartment should have gone out, join his accomplice, recover Maddie then run away by separating since Tanner saw only one suspect. Or, the kidnapper was alone and he let Maddie slide down the wall until she fell to the floor to leave her alone to go out and get her back. Only these scenarios do not hold water given the statements of each. Indeed, referring to the timing of each other, according to statements by members of the hotel, as well as those guests present that night by adding the statements of the couple's friends as to the hours they were seeing the children and where they were minute by minute, the kidnapper would have had only a very short minutes to remove Madeleine as described upper. According to the tests of the PJ, it is unachievable without being discovered by one or the other person present, as far as the friends do not lie in their statements. The PC must be based on facts, analyzing the statements concerning the timing of the couple's friends as well as that of the couple itself, if no one is lying, the kidnapping is not credible! In addition, the kidnapper had to run away without being seen by the club's surveillance cameras. On the other hand, if the kidnapper had put Maddie through the window, traces of DNA were found on the window, along the wall or on the floor at the bottom of the window. But this is not the case, the only traces of DNA found here are that of Kate.
All means have been tried.
Despite the increasingly obvious possibility of the kidnapping thesis, the PJ made every effort to find a potential abductor. There have been dozens and dozens of investigations and verifications of suspects of sexual abuse. The PC checked and heard all the people who might have been on holiday in the Algarve during this period to check if they had any relationship with Maddie. All members of the village were interviewed and their statements verified. The PJ searched over 400 homes around the Ocean Club without finding anything. Through the window where Kate claims that Maddie was abducted, no traces of DNA or remnants of some sorts belonging to Madeleine were found. The final report shows the details of a survey that has reached new heights never seen !! The investigators were led to verify a couple who would have been suspected child abduction! They combed the places where Maddie would have been seen. They thoroughly searched a crematorium. They even compared the genetic profile from the body of a child found on the US coast. They investigated presumptions about a beggar and tracked and analyzed thousands of tracks in the most remote places in the world sending inspectors to Australia. In vain ! Nothing allows to accredit the thesis of kidnapping. We know from professional experience that the perfect crime does not exist. In view of the elements above,
What the final report contains
Thirteen months of research and the report naccuse person but it brings to light new and very strong doubts in the thesis of the abduction advanced by the parents of Madeleine. The report describes in detail the various elements and indices collected by the investigators as well as all the controls and verifications carried out. The PC tried to confirm the abduction hypothesis. They wanted to believe with all their might, but the evidence gathered showed the impossibility of this theory. One of the slowest investigations of this research was to collect and analyze all the information concerning means of escape by land, sea and air. Everything was analyzed, nothing was left to chance. The images taken by tourists during their holidays in Algarve were analyzed but nothing decisive was found. This information has all been compiled as an annex to the procedure and another annex only for sexual crime suspects. The PJ has also established a record of all those known to be violent and has verified their lives in detail. It was important to determine if there was any connection with Madeleine. The final report launches the inevitable conviction of Madeleine's death on May 3rd in Praia. It was important to determine if there was any connection with Madeleine. The final report launches the inevitable conviction of Madeleine's death on May 3rd in Praia. It was important to determine if there was any connection with Madeleine. The final report launches the inevitable conviction of Madeleine's death on May 3rd in Praia.
More than an hour to cry.
Madeleine's parents never denied that they left their three children alone in the apartment while they went to dinner at night. This fact has also been confirmed by the Ocean Club staff members. The parents always assured that they went to see the children every evening half an hour in half an hour. Remember that at 19:00 in the evening, in May, in Portugal, it is as clear as at noon. The statements of the neighbor, Pamela Fenn calls into question the version of the parents. She claims to have heard Maddie crying for an hour and 15 minutes two nights before she disappeared. The British told the inspectors that in the night of May 1 at 22:30, she heard Madeleine cry. She confirmed to the PJ that the child remained inconsolable for 1:15 until the parents returned. The neighbor heard the sound of the McCann apartment door at 11:45 pm, when parents usually returned from their evening. Yvonne Martin, a British social security worker, had warned parents of their carelessness about their children.
The dogs were decisive.
The action of specially trained British dogs to detect the smell of corpse and human blood was decisive for Gerry and Kate to be suspected. Faced with the coincidence of the action of the two dogs, who reported the same places as well as the same objects, the authorities were obliged to admit a possible implication of the parents in the disappearance of their daughter and to designate them arguidos in order to confront them with the elements which could lead them to an indictment. The inspectors explain that the dogs showed signs of cadaver odor and human blood in the following places and objects:
- In the apartment where Madeleine disappeared (In the couple's room and in the living room)
- In the vegetable garden
- In the vehicle rented by parents 24 days after Maddie's disappearance.
- On two Kate's clothes
- On Maddie's teddy that Kate did not let go the days following the disappearance.
In the apartment of the McCann's friends, in the village of Praia and in the vehicles used by Robert Murat - the first accused to be suspected - nothing was detected by the dogs. Given these indications, reinforced by other examinations carried out in Portugal and England, the PJ questioned Kate and Gerry before naming them arguidos.
Witnesses to hear
In these statements, Gonçalo Amaral, who was the coordinator of the case, who has now retired for six days, says that on 2 October, the days of his removal, we were finishing some work for a very important witness to come to Portugal. Gonçalo Amaral said that his colleagues have not been able to concretize the arrival of this witness. Let us add that SOS Maddie reveals the existence of two decisive testimonies which have not yet been communicated to the Portuguese authorities. These witnesses would directly challenge the responsibility of one of McCann's friends. These testimonies did not follow the normal circuit of international cooperation. Some police forces that collaborated in the investigation of the UK's soil would have been overtaken by the actions of their precise hierarchy SOS Maddie.
React to this article on the forum |
| Procedure classified as homicide |  July 03, 2008
The procedure will be classified as homicide !!
The procedure on the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will be included in the archives of the court of Portimao by decision of the Public Ministry, under the label: Homicide. The prosecutor holding the file, Magalhães e Menezes, issues the file (ie, qualifies the file or the accusation) as: QUALIFIED HOMICIDE AND OCCULTATION OF CADAVRE
The PJ delivered its final report on all the research done since May 2007. The press was quick to say that the final document (recall that this is a multi-volume file) did not contain sufficient evidence and that the case would be closed. Note, to be complete, that very many newspapers base all of their articles mainly on agency dispatches. So, in our previous article, we made an article based ONLY on agency news that we receive as any other media. Most observers you will have realized that this article looked like two drops of water to those published by other media and for cause since it came from the same agencies. The basic article of the press agency did not stipulate that the case was dismissed without result, but left doubt behind. Also, depending on the interpretation of each other, various newspapers concluded that the case was not only closed but also closed. But reality is more subtle than that.
It is the Public Ministry that decides!
At the moment describe these lines, the Public Ministry (MP) studies the necessity or not of asking for new duties of complementary investigation. Larchivage file Madeleine McCann, missing May 3, 2007, is absolutely not a certainty! On the contrary, it is more than likely that new investigative duties are requested from the MP by the MP. It is not excluded that the McCann's friends are invited to return to Portugal. The PJ sent a final report containing all the diligences and inquiries made during these months and the means used. This report is now in the hands of the MP and will be subject to a careful assessment and weighting as guaranteed by a source close to the Attorney General in a statement sent to all editorial offices.
Towards a new reconstitution?
The new investigative duties possible may go through a new reconstruction of the night of the disappearance of Maddie. This implies that the McCann couple's friends as well as the McCanns themselves, are invited for some and notified for others to come to Portugal. We have no illusions in this matter, we are not Utopian, we know that this reenactment will not take place but we are curious to know what the McCann's friends will give as an excuse, this time, not to participate ?! The report recalled the inconsistencies between the various statements of the couple's friends regarding the events of the night of the disappearance. The MP might want to remove all doubts. In this same communiqué sent to the editors, the PGR also guarantees that the end of the secret of justice will be for August 14th !! There is a short time before the file is available to all. The report, which has 19 volumes and thousands of documents, does not indicate whether the file should be archived (classified) or whether to launch an indictment. The reason is simple: It is up to the MP to decide whether the case should be closed or whether to launch a formal accusation. The PJ is limited to investigating, researching, carrying out fieldwork assignments and presenting the assembled elements, without further ado. The police are not judges! They present facts, as such, in the raw state and it is up to the MP to decide their uses! The report, which has 19 volumes and thousands of documents, does not indicate whether the file should be archived (classified) or whether to launch an indictment. The reason is simple: It is up to the MP to decide whether the case should be closed or whether to launch a formal accusation. The PJ is limited to investigating, researching, carrying out fieldwork assignments and presenting the assembled elements, without further ado. The police are not judges! They present facts, as such, in the raw state and it is up to the MP to decide their uses! The report, which has 19 volumes and thousands of documents, does not indicate whether the file should be archived (classified) or whether to launch an indictment. The reason is simple: It is up to the MP to decide whether the case should be closed or whether to launch a formal accusation. The PJ is limited to investigating, researching, carrying out fieldwork assignments and presenting the assembled elements, without further ado. The police are not judges! They present facts, as such, in the raw state and it is up to the MP to decide their uses! to carry out homework assignments and to present the assembled elements, without more. The police are not judges! They present facts, as such, in the raw state and it is up to the MP to decide their uses! to carry out homework assignments and to present the assembled elements, without more. The police are not judges! They present facts, as such, in the raw state and it is up to the MP to decide their uses!
Towards a charge?
The echoes that the file does not contain sufficient evidence to lead to a charge is, even Laveu same source close to the investigation that launched this rumors, that a mere intuition and does not guarantee that there will be no accusation. The most likely outcome of the proceedings is that Kate and Gerry are accused of blunder. An opinion also shared by various inspectors of the PJ: They were dined leaving their children alone, it is not a futile accusation, we know what happened next! Various uncertainties continue to hover. The hypothesis of what happened that night is the accidental homicide and the finding of a corpse, which the prosecutor also described as a Homicide and the occultation of a corpse.
React to this article on the forum |
| End of the survey |  July 01, 2008
The Portuguese police are closing their investigation.
The Portuguese police have concluded their investigation into the disappearance of the little Briton Madeleine McCann, 14 months ago in the south of Portugal, and submitted her report to the public prosecutor who must decide to continue or terminate the investigation. learned Tuesday from judicial source.
The final report prepared by the judicial police (PJ) was attached to the procedure of the so-called Maddie case, said a statement from the Office of the Attorney General of the Republic. However, the investigation into the mysterious disappearance on May 3, 2007 of little Maddie, then aged three, from a tourist complex in southern Portugal, is not over. The Judicial Police continues, at the disposal of the public prosecutor's office until he decides to close the investigation, the deputy national director of the PJ Pedro Carmo told the press.
Moreover, the secrecy of the investigation, extended last May because of the complexity of the case, is maintained until mid-August, said the public prosecutor, who must now analyze the report of the investigation of the PJ and will proceed to the analysis and the overall assessment of the entire procedure (which includes dozens of volumes) to determine whether further steps are still required or whether sufficient and necessary conditions are in place to complete the investigation. The announcement of the prosecutor's office comes after the publication on Tuesday in the press of information indicating that the Portuguese authorities were close to close the investigation and to classify the case, believing not to have collected sufficient evidence for a formal indictment.
Reaction of the spokesperson.
Three people are still indicted. In addition to the Briton, Robert Murat, the girl's parents, Kate and Gerry McCann, suspected of having removed the body of the child after an accidental death, were indicted on 7 September. The couple, who never ceased to proclaim their innocence, organized an unprecedented international campaign to find little Maddie. From Britain, McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell was quick to respond to news in the Portuguese media. He considered that the indictment of the couple should be lifted immediately if it was confirmed that the police would close the investigation and requested access to the file. The information contained in the file can not stay on shelves to take dust, he said. During a series of interviews in Britain, the spokesman also suggested that if the investigation was officially closed, the files should be transferred to private investigators recruited by the McCanns in hopes of finding "Maddie". The little girl had disappeared on May 3, 2007 a few days before her fourth birthday, so what stayed with family in a tourist complex in southern Portugal.
His parents were declared suspects after the announcement of the discovery of Madeleine's DNA in a car rented by his parents, more than three weeks after his disappearance. But the Portuguese police chief, Alipio Ribeiro, then said that the tests performed on these traces were inconclusive. The McCanns have always claimed that they had nothing to do with the disappearance of their daughter. According to Portuguese law, the satut of "arguido" (suspect) is an intermediate status that does not mean a charge, but is used when the police believe they have evidence against someone. The person considered to be "suspicious" has "total freedom of movement" provided that the judicial authorities are informed beforehand. For his part, the Portuguese lawyer of the couple Rogério Alves,
Neither abduction nor accidental death.
The investigation, which was a turning point last summer when investigators began to favor the assumption of the death of the child relying on clues taken from the apartment and the McCann vehicle, had since fallen into a deadlock. According to the press on Tuesday, the police investigation report does not support either the abduction thesis, defended by the parents, or that of the accidental death. Working under heavy pressure, particularly from the British press, Portuguese investigators have accumulated setbacks.
The head of the investigation team, Gonçalo Amaral, had been dismissed last October for openly criticizing his British colleagues for bias. Mr. Amaral retired on Monday, he said, to regain his freedom of expression and to defend himself in a book that he plans to publish.
React to this article on the forum |
| |
|
Copyright © 2000- Aimoo Free Forum All rights reserved.
AimooHelpForum
Aimoo Forum List |
Ticket |
Today |
Member |
Search |
Who's On |
Chat Room | Photos | Help |
Sign In |
|
