Chris RobertsOK, here we go, let's rock and roll For the avoidance of doubt I'd be delighted to appear for Lizzy as a witness to her exemplary character any time.
#1 . "Why do you say 4 markers were degraded in DNA sample 15/37 " Because it happens to be true ?
Chris Roberts#2 " 2. Why do you quote de Almeida’s interim report as if it is the conclusion of the files? "
It is quoted in context and is a conclusion of an honourable police officer and man, just at that of Snr Amaral is. It should be noted that in effect, 3 High Court of Appeal judges ratified such a conclusion as being equally likely as the risible "conclusion" of the Attorney General and that after good old' Gordon Brown had heavily involved himself.
Chris Roberts#3 " Why do you allow posters proved to have paedophilic thoughts to infiltrate and influence your group? "
No-one can know what thoughts someone may actually have and even then this is not 1984. In any event, deeds speak much louder than thoughts orwords and personally I think that "befriending" someone convicted of defrauding the state in these times of austerity with the effect it has on children below the poverty line is far worse than edited "reporting" on a conversation between myself and the rabid Brian Robertson. I know you'll appreciate my copious response Gash although I think "fuck off you sicko druggy bitch" would have been equally appropriate.
Chris Roberts#4 "Why did you make up your mind before the PJ Files were released?"
Many of us can spot liars a mile off Gash ...... it's why you're about as popular as a fart in a wet suit and limited to your pathetic pondslime group.
Chris Roberts#5 " Why do you and your admins bully and boot off posters who challenge your view of the case? "
Nobody is booted from anywhere if they show respect and put forward a cogent argument. Unfortunately it's not something you and your ilk are ever able to do and coupled with the fact that you have the manners of a sewer rat and are soporifically BORING, I cannot criticise any admin for sticking you where you belong, in the garbage.
Besides, HDH admin are the most dignified and fair minded of any on the groups. For myself, I just wipe the shit off my boots
Chris Roberts#6 " . "Why don't you let Amaral's mistakes, incompetence and criminal convictions be discussed but instead portray him as a saint and victim? "
Any and all mistakes made by the PJ were as a result of the PJ being handed as poison chalice of lies and cynical deceit by the McCanns and their cronies. Amaral's criminal conviction was for falsifying a report in a case where the Cipriano's claimed "police brutality" having sliced a young child's body into pieces and disposed of it, never to be found. Amaral was simply protecting those wrongly accused by scum...... just as us "antis" do in rebutting your accusations of a great and honourable man. Incidentally, there are only two victims here. Goncalo and a dead child.
Chris Roberts#8 " "Why did you say you would debate with Robin and Robert and then back out of it? "
Given the abuse heaped on Lizzy by scum and that when offered the opportunity they just ran for the hills anyway, yet another vapid question.
Chris Roberts#9 " 9. Why do you claim Amaral’s book is a distillation of the police files? " In the main it certainly is ( ratified as such by the High Court ) but of course much more water has flowed under the bridge since the archiving.
Chris Roberts#10 "Why do you present your own material instead of referring people to the actual files?"
Most people wouldn't understand the files as written just as you clearly don't so an erudite interpretation of them is essential.
Chris Roberts#11 " "Why do you create graphics about things that are not in the files? "
Much more water under the bridge and expressing an erudite opinion in pictures is an opinion you might just be able to grasp.
Chris Roberts#12 " . Why do you continue to support a book which has been proven to have harmed the McCanns? "
Because it's a very fair summation of the evidence and has been ratified as such by the High Court of Appeal, just as the lack of damage caused by it has.
Chris Roberts#12 " . Why do you not accept that they are NOT suspects for any investigation? " QED ... no "fix" lasts forever. e.g Lee Harvey Oswald is now accepted as not having acted alone with all of the main players now dead.
Chris Roberts( Might have gone out of of order here but no matter. Maintaining concentration wading through this total crap isn't easy )
Chris RobertsSo.... #14 . . "Why are we not allowed in your group to help correct myths and misinfo? " 1. Because you have nothing to correct, 2. Because you're too stupid. 3. Please refer to #5.
Chris Roberts#15 " Why do you misinform in your videos that the chances of it not being Madeleine’s DNA in the car, is millions to 1? "
I haven;'t checked Ladbrokes prices recently but our own in house DNA expert, the eminently qualified Janine Bresnick does seem to agree. On the other hand those who disagree include someone who's shined a chair with her arse in a call centre for the last 15 years.
Chris Roberts#16 " Why do you allow your members to viciously attack ‘pros’ on your group, and then always end up removing the ‘pro’ to stop the trouble being caused by your ‘anti’ members? "
LOLOLOLOLOL !!!!!!!!!!!
Chris Roberts#17 " . Why do you allow Janine Bresnick’s nonsense to go unchecked? "
Please refer to #15............. idiot.
Chris Roberts#18 " . Will you admit to being a propagandist? "
disseminating information is much better definition.
Chris Roberts#19 " Why do you support wicked men over Madeleine? "
I haven't seen ANY support for Gerry McCann or David Payne from anyone with an IQ greater than their shoe size.
Chris Roberts#20 " Why do you claim 15/19 markers were found, when this is blatant misinformation? "
Please refer to our own in house DNA expert, the eminently qualified Janine Bresnick... but request the explanation in words of no more than two syllables.
Chris Roberts#21 " Why do you try to explain (sometimes using cheese) something that the forensics expert said was too complex for analysis? "
Please refer to our own in house DNA expert, the eminently qualified Janine Bresnick... but request the explanation in words of no more than ONE syllable
Chris Roberts#22 " . Why do you suggest that the DNA found in the car was definitely blood related? "
Please refer to our own in house DNA expert, the eminently qualified Janine Bresnick... but request the explanation in pictures drawn in crayon.
Chris Roberts#23 " Why do you allow John Lowe to be libelled on a daily basis in HDH? "
Libeled ? No .... changing story questioned ? Yes.
Please refer to our own in house DNA expert, the eminently qualified Janine Bresnick... but request the explanation to be transmitted telepathically,
Chris Roberts#24 " Why do you state that Kate knew Madeleine was dead? "
Many clues to this but complaining about the speed of the police car on the way to an alleged "sighting" is a BIG red flag.
Chris Roberts#25 " Why do you disregard completely the results of the GNR sniffer dogs? " Because the results can be safely disregarded as they were given no guaranteed scent control sample.
Chris Roberts#26 " Why do you perpetuate the myth that only Kate’s fingerprints were found on the window "
Because they were and only in the position required to open it. No myth, just fact.... please refer to the dictionary definition of the word "FACT"...... and while you're in the letter 'F' look for "fuckwit".as well
Chris Roberts#27 " Why do you perpetuate the myth that the PJ searched in vain for any of Madeleine’s DNA in the apartment? "
Please refer to #26 to save me some typing.
Chris Roberts#28 " Why do you produce graphics driving controversy over the ‘last photo’? " Because the "last photo" is an obvious and proven FAKE. .... there you go, it's in the 'F' section of that dictionary too
Chris Roberts#29 " Why do you say the prosecutor could have declared the McCanns innocent? He could not have done this, as there was no indication of any crime for them to be innocent of "
A child DISAPPEARS and there was no indication of a crime ? Rarely am I rendered speechless by a BUFFOON but this is one such occasion.
Chris Roberts#30 " . Why do you state that the sea-bass, dirty nappies, leaking meat container, Madeleine crying are EXCUSES from the McCann team " Because they clearly are and most notably, a two year old developing a taste for an expensive fish in a family who at the time didn't have a receptacle to urinate in.
Chris Roberts#31 " . Why do you state that the sea-bass, dirty nappies, leaking meat container, Madeleine crying are EXCUSES from the McCann team "
You allow photos of me and other people to be posted by yourself and other pondslime Gash so what's the problem ?
Chris Roberts#32 " Why do you suggest that there is a mania for pros to deny the possibility of Madeleine’s blood being behind the sofa? "
Perhaps because you deny EVERYTHING and promote what can only be described as a fairy tale.
Chris Roberts#33 " Why do you allow your members to suggest that Madeleine’s blood had seeped under the tiles, when the blood under the tile belonged to a Portuguese police officer? "
Everyone is entitled to an opinion and the only thing that could ever validate any of your own opinions would be if I had given it to you.
Chris Roberts#34 " If all you want to accomplish is for the UK PUBLIC to have access to the files, why do you insist upon directing them to Amaral’s book and documentary? "
You omitted the really quite excellent Richard D Hall's videos but no matter. There are MANY thousands of pages in the files and erudite distillation is essential.
Chris Roberts#35 " Why do you make liars & accomplices out of witnesses in an attempt to suggest Madeleine was dead before 3rd? "
Because of their ever changing stories and glaring discrepancies mayhap?
Chris Roberts#36 " Why do you post in horror over the treatment of Brenda Leyland, whilst supporting Sonia Poulton who plans to employ the same techniques in her documentary? "
Sonia Poulton is not employed by a major "news" channel and no-one else has died yet. It should however be noted how ALL of the pondslime in one way or another actually APPLAUDED Brenda's death with such as "she had it coming".
Yet you still wonder why good people want nothing to do with pondslime other than to grind you into the shit? You really shouldn't.
Chris Roberts#38 " Why did you use the image of Brenda Leyland in your video, even though she was not a member of your group, and you have no idea whether her family want her to be represented as such; and also before the results of the inquest are disclosed? "
Posting photos and videos without permission Gash ? When you've finished in the dictionary 'F' section, mover to 'H' and look for HYPOCRITE.
Chris Roberts#39 " Why do you allow Christopher Roberts to be in your forum despite his inappropriate comments about children and disgusting behaviour in the community, including the illegal obtaining and sharing of private messages of other members, and obtaining addresses in order to threaten?
Already answered ..... have you found "hypocrite" yet ? You have? Cool .. there's a good mollusc
Chris Roberts#40 " Why do you use old press articles in your videos as if the information within them is current? "
Madeleine died in May 2007 and there is nothing really more "current" than that .. unless you're talking about PC Deadwood's laughable and myriad "suspects" plus the continuing McCann lies and BS of course.
Chris Roberts#41 " Why do you allow your members to perpetuate the fridge blog myth, even though you know it is made up? "
NO myth at all and I am one of the people who read this in GM's blog before it was hurriedly removed and I would swear to that under oath Gash, do you have anything you would authenticate in such a way?
Chris Roberts#43 " Why do you still maintain dogs give evidence in your videos, when they only provide intelligence? "
Intelligence is circumstantial evidence and is , depending on its import and other such evidence, equally valid. Men went to the gallows back in the day with much less "intelligence" incriminating them. ( I do love this piccy because of it's graphic representation of the true situation.)
Chris Roberts#46 " Why have you started a new group aimed at helping 'One Child At A Time' when everything you do is to the detriment of the McCann twins? "
Do you know the difference between the numbers ONE and TWO ?.Besides, if social services had done there job properly the twins would be well out of harms way by now.
Chris Roberts#47 " Why won't you take responsibility for the lies and misinformation of others - Frances Gallagher, Ben Thompson, etc.-that has been taken directly from your materials?. "
Who takes responsibility for your vapid venom and BS ? Ah yes of course ..... you only post as directed by Guest and Gurney, there's a good puppy dog.
|
