|
|
| Title: 9. Why do you claim Amaral’s book is a distillation of the police files? | |
| madeleinemccanncontroversy > HiDeHo 48 QUESTIONS > HiDeHo 48 Questions | Go to subcategory： |
| Author | Content |
HiDeHo
|
|
|
Date Posted：15/02/2015 10:17 AMCopy HTML 9. Why do you claim Amaral’s book is a distillation of the police files? A Judge claims the book reflects the facts of the investigation during the time Goncalo Amaral coordinated it. It says in the book, in the appeals court ruling and in the judge's decision about proven and unproven facts! http://themaddiecasefiles.com/post321131.html#p321131 27. Are the facts that are reported by defendant Gonçalo Amaral in the book and in the aforementioned interviews, like he himself writes and said, facts that were established during the inquiry? 28. Does the documentary only contain facts that are also in the inquiry files? (Both articles) It is proved that the facts in the book and in the documentary, concerning the investigation, are mostly facts that took place in the investigation and are documented as such. http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/court_docs.htm The book that was written by the first defendant, Dr. Goncalo Amaral, presents a thesis that was at one time defended by several participants in the police investigation: that little Madeleine died accidentally and that her parents, here the first applicants, were suspected of concealing the cadaver. This defendant was the Coordinating Inspector of the investigation into the case of the disappearance, thus being the most qualified police officer who intervened in the investigation until the time when, through a decision from the Judiciary Police's (PJ) directory, he was removed from that function. In that role, the defendant was deeply involved in the entire investigation and had the opportunity to formulate all of the possible conclusions about the case, while it was under investigation. (...) In the book that is at stake here - "Maddie - the Truth of the Lie" - the author presents a vast multiplicity of facts and then offers his interpretation of said facts. Those facts are all part of the investigation and are exhaustively considered and weighed in the archiving dispatch of the process that is on the DVD which has been appended to this court case (page 441). In that description, there are main facts and others that are secondary, but which the author attributes value to, based on his experience as a police investigator, an activity that he has performed for 26 years. The author describes, in detail, several facts and circumstances that were not coherent in between each other, from the outset of the investigation, thus prompting contradictory conclusions. |
|
HiDeHo
|
Share to:
#1
|
|
Re：9. Why do you claim Amaral’s book is a distillation of the police files? Date Posted：16/02/2015 12:32 PMCopy HTML bump
|
