Title: 3. Why do you allow posters proved to have paedophilic thoughts to infiltrate and influence your gro

madeleinemccanncontroversy > HiDeGuida 48 QUESTIONS > New Sub-category Example

Go to subcategory： OJ SIMPSON - PARALLELS WITH MADELEINE McCANN—— OJ SimpsonHDH THREADS—— Bumped posts (Unexplained)HDH WORDPRESS BLOG—— WORDPRESS POSTSPOLICE FILES OF INTEREST—— Random Information from Portuguese Police FilesThe NEW HiDeHo CONTROVERSY Group—— WELCOME to HDH Controversy & Info—— HDH ARCHIVED Facebook posts—— OFF TOPIC Removed posts from HDH CONTROVERSY—— McCanns v Goncalo Amaral TRIAL Sept 2013—— Disruptions—— Archived Posts 2ONE-ON-ONE Debates and Discussions—— One-on-One Debates and DiscussionsPLEASE VISIT HERE IF FACEBOOK GROUP IS UNAVAILABLE—— PLEASE POST HERE IF YOU HAVE DIFFICULTIES WITH FACEBOOKVIDEOS—— HiDeHo4 VideosCONTROVERSY FACEBOOK GROUP—— Facebook Posts from the OLD CONTROVERSY group—— Facebook Group Welcome & Info About Posting—— Member's CommentsCOMMENTS—— Controversy Reference Forum Comments—— HiDeHo RESEARCH POSTSINTRODUCTION TO THE CASE—— Info for New Members About the InvestigationGENERAL—— Graphics—— InformationTOPICS—— Individual TopicsDISCREPANCIES—— Discrepancies by Topic—— Kate's Book 'madeleine'TIMELINE—— Various Timelines/TimetablesHiDeHo Controversy TEACHING GROUP—— LESSONSSTATEMENTS—— Various Witness Statements from the POLICE FILESFORENSICS—— Forensic Posts—— Forensic InformationCALENDARS—— Calendars 2007INVESTIGATION REFERENCE INFO—— New Sub-category Example—— Reference Links and Archived Threads—— Kate's Book Info—— Random Videos of InterestPEOPLE—— Family & Friends—— Tapas 9 Info—— Ocean Club Guests—— Lawyers—— Portugal—— Ocean Club Staff—— Suspects/PhotofitsFUND—— Fund InfoMEDIA—— New Sub-category ExampleBODY LANGUAGE—— Craig Baxter - All About Body LanguageLIBEL TRIALS—— GENERAL Libel Issues—— Goncalo Amaral v McCanns—— McCanns v Tony BennettLINKS—— Media & Government Contact Info—— Forums / Blogs / GroupsGONCALO AMARAL—— Goncalo Amaral Books & Videos—— Gonçalo Amaral Interviews & Comments—— Gonçalo Amaral General InfoTONY BENNETTGRAPHICS2ADMIN—— New Sub-category Example—— Buttons—— Banned—— OtherCOVER UP—— Random InfoEOD—— DocsOJ SIMPSON Paralells with Madeleine McCann Investigation—— New Sub-category ExampleHiDeHo 48 QUESTIONS—— HiDeHo 48 QuestionsHiDeGuida 48 QUESTIONS—— New Sub-category Example—— Codes and ScreenshotsWAYBACK MACHINE—— Codes and Screenshots—— Links & Websites—— Waybback Threads—— Communications with WBMSAVE MAX—— Max InfoARCHIVED WEB PAGES—— www.mccannfiles.com—— Cristobel—— Joana MoraisTFI—— New Sub-category ExampleDISCREPANCY LIST & ALL RESEARCH LINKS BY TOPIC—— TOPICS

Author

Content

HiDeHo

Rank：Diamond Member Score：2851 Posts：2851 From：USA Register：26/01/2013 4:34 PM

Date Posted：08/02/2015 5:39 AMCopy HTML 3. Why do you allow posters proved to have paedophilic thoughts to infiltrate and influence your group?... I am not aware of anyone in the group that has been proven to have those thoughts.   I have seen comments that may very well be out of context or a retalliatory comment emanating from comments that may exist prior to the 'start' of the personal and confidential 'conversation' I do however view private PMs made public as totally disrespectful and unacceptable. Infiltrate? Influence? I have seen nothing on HDH to suggest any topic about paedophilia has been discussed, never mind influenced. Admin remove threads of that nature, with the exception of file based discussions such as the Gaspar Statements  We have no evidence of anyone being a paedophile in the group.   Mentioning possible links to paedophilia based on what is known about the case should not mean someone is branded a paedophile.  After all it was the McCanns themselves who first raised the issue of Paedophilia. However I have seen the Pond make several references to paedophilia. I have been 'likened' to Jimmy Savile...lol and have been accuse of harbouring Paedophiles which is a totally disgusting comment and not worthy of response. Obsession comes to mind... I do not check into the backgrounds of my members.  Their behaviour in the group is the deciding factor as to whether they remain. I have been known to allow 'axe murderers' into HDH as long as they have friends in the group and as long as they behave themselves....Unfortunately this one only lasted a matter of minutes...Maybe I should have checked his wall, but I did not have time to check,l or I would have noticed the pic of his toilet...AFTER...lol  My admin do not allow me near the 'Welcomes' any longer... (Only using this as an example, sadly he was very disturbed) May I ask why you appear to have this obsession with accusing members of HDH as being paedophiles?   Do you have the proof?  If so, maybe the POLICE are who to contact?